Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 955–964 | Cite as

Men’s Objectifying Media Consumption, Objectification of Women, and Attitudes Supportive of Violence Against Women

  • Paul J. Wright
  • Robert S. Tokunaga
Original Paper


A recent White House Council Report on Women and Girls called attention to sexual assault on college campuses and encouraged continued research on this important public health problem. Media that sexually objectify women have been identified by feminist scholars as encouraging of sexual assault, but some researchers question why portrayals that do not feature sexual assault should affect men’s attitudes supportive of violence against women. Guided by the concepts of specific and abstract sexual scripting in Wright’s (Communication Yearbook 35:343–386, 2011) sexual script acquisition, activation, application model of sexual media socialization, this study proposed that the more men are exposed to objectifying depictions, the more they will think of women as entities that exist for men’s sexual gratification (specific sexual scripting), and that this dehumanized perspective on women may then be used to inform attitudes regarding sexual violence against women (abstract sexual scripting). Data were gathered from collegiate men sexually attracted to women (N = 187). Consistent with expectations, associations between men’s exposure to objectifying media and attitudes supportive of violence against women were mediated by their notions of women as sex objects. Specifically, frequency of exposure to men’s lifestyle magazines that objectify women, reality TV programs that objectify women, and pornography predicted more objectified cognitions about women, which, in turn, predicted stronger attitudes supportive of violence against women.


Pornography Men’s magazines Reality TV Objectification Violence 3AM 


  1. Allen, M., Emmers, T., Gebhardt, M., & Giery, M. (1995). Pornography and rape myth acceptance. Journal of Communication, 45, 5–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00711.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from
  3. Anderson, C. A., & Anderson, K. B. (2008). Men who target women: Specificity of target, generality of aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 605–622. doi: 10.1002/ab.20274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography. (1986). Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3, 265–299. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogaert, A. F., Woodard, U., & Hafer, C. L. (1999). Intellectual ability and reactions to pornography. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 283–291. doi: 10.1080/00224499909551998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breazeale, K. (1994). In spite of women: Esquire magazine and the construction of the male consumer. Signs, 20, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Basile, K. C., Walters, M. L., Chen, J., & Merrick, M. T. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63, 1–18.Google Scholar
  9. Bridges, A. J., Wosnitzer, R., Scharrer, E., Sun, C., & Liberman, R. (2010). Aggression and sexual behavior in best-selling pornography videos. Violence Against Women, 16, 1065–1085. doi: 10.1177/1077801210382866.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks, G. (1995). The centerfold syndrome. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, J. D., & L’Engle, K. L. (2009). X-rated: Sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with U.S. early adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit media. Communication Research, 36, 129–151. doi: 10.1177/0093650208326465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunner, E. A. (2013). Impotence, nostalgia, and objectification: Patriarchal visual rhetoric to contain women. Visual Culture & Gender, 8, 31–45.Google Scholar
  13. Burgess, G. H. (2007). Assessment of rape-supportive attitudes and beliefs in college men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 973–993. doi: 10.1177/0886260507302993.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Media violence and the American public: Scientific facts versus media misinformation. American Psychologist, 56, 477–489. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.6-7.477.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Carr, J. L., & VanDeusen, K. M. (2004). Risk factors for male sexual aggression on college campuses. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 279–289. doi: 10.1023/B:JOFV.0000042078.55308.4d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cassidy, L. (2012). Mindful breathing: Creating counterpublic space in the religious studies classroom. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 28, 164–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Check, J., & Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Pornography and sexual aggression: A social learning theory analysis. Communication Yearbook, 9, 181–213.Google Scholar
  20. Chrisler, J. C., Bacher, J. E., Bangali, A. M., Campagna, A. J., & McKeigue, A. C. (2012). A quick and dirty tour of misogynistic bro culture. Sex Roles, 66, 810–811. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0123-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cowan, G., Lee, C., Levy, D., & Snyder, D. (1988). Dominance and inequality in X-rated videocassettes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 299–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00945.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diamond, M., Jozifkova, E., & Weiss, P. (2011). Pornography and sex crimes in the Czech Republic. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1037–1043. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9696-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dines, G. (2006). The White man’s burden: Gonzo pornography and the construction of Black masculinity. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 18, 293–297.Google Scholar
  24. Dines, G. (2010). Pornland: How porn has hijacked our sexuality. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Domoff, S. E. (2013). The short-term effects of viewing sexually objectifying media. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Toledo, OH.Google Scholar
  26. Dworkin, A. (1989). Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
  27. Esquire. (2015). Esquire media kit. Retrieved from
  28. Ferguson, C. J., & Hartley, R. D. (2009). The pleasure is momentary… the expense damnable? The influence of pornography on rape and sexual assault. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 323–329. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferris, A. L., Smith, S. W., Greenberg, B. S., & Smith, S. L. (2007). The content of reality dating shows and viewer perceptions of dating. Journal of Communication, 57, 490–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00354.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fisher, W. A., Kohut, T., Gioacchino, L. A., & Fedoroff, P. (2013). Pornography, sex crime, and paraphilia. Current Psychiatry Reports, 15, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (2005). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality (2nd ed.). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 422–440. doi: 10.1002/ab.20195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gorman, S., Monk-Turner, E., & Fish, J. N. (2010). Free adult internet web sites. Gender Issues, 27, 131–145. doi: 10.1007/s12147-010-9095-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hald, G. M., Malamuth, N. M., & Yuen, C. (2010). Pornography and attitudes supporting violence against women: Revisiting the relationship in nonexperimental studies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 14–20. doi: 10.1002/ab.20328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Howell, D. C. (2014). Treatment of missing data. Retrieved from
  37. Huesmann, L. R. (1986). Psychological processes promoting the relation between exposure to media violence and aggressive behavior by the viewer. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 125–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00246.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jensen, R. (2007). Getting off: Pornography and the end of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  39. Johnson, S., & Sivek, S. C. (2009). Framing sex, romance, and relationships in Cosmopolitan and Maxim. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 24, 1–16.Google Scholar
  40. Kingston, D. A., & Malamuth, N. M. (2011). Problems with aggregate data and the importance of individual differences in the study of pornography and sexual aggression. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1045–1048. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9743-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kingston, D. A., Malamuth, N. M., Federoff, P., & Marshall, W. L. (2009). The importance of individual differences in pornography use: Theoretical perspectives and implications for treating sexual offenders. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 216–232. doi: 10.1080/00224490902747701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kistler, M. E., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Does exposure to sexual hip-hop music videos influence the sexual attitudes of college students? Mass Communication and Society, 13, 67–86. doi: 10.1080/15205430902865336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kjellgren, C., Priebe, G., Svedin, C. G., & Langstrom, N. (2010). Sexually coercive behavior in male youth: Population survey of general and specific risk factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1161–1169. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9572-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Krassas, N. R., Blauwkamp, J. M., & Wesselink, P. (2003). “Master your Johnson”: Sexual rhetoric in Maxim and Stuff magazines. Sexuality and Culture, 7, 98–119. doi: 10.1007/s12119-003-1005-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krebs, C. P., Lindquist, C. H., Warner, T. D., Fisher, B. S., & Martin, S. L. (2009). College women’s experiences with physically forced, alcohol-or other drug-enabled, and drug-facilitated sexual assault before and since entering college. Journal of American College Health, 57, 639–649. doi: 10.3200/JACH.57.6.639-649.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Linz, D., & Malamuth, N. M. (1993). Pornography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2015). Do American states with more religious or conservative populations search more for sexual content on Google? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 137–147. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0361-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Malamuth, N. M. (1996). Sexually explicit media, gender differences, and evolutionary theory. Journal of Communication, 46, 8–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01486.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Malamuth, N. M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression. Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 26–91. doi: 10.1080/10532528.2000.10559784.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Malamuth, N. M., Hald, G. M., & Koss, M. (2012). Pornography, individual differences in risk and men’s acceptance of violence against women in a representative sample. Sex Roles, 66, 427–439. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0082-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavey, C. L., Barnes, G., & Acker, M. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353–369. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Malamuth, N. M., & Pitpitan, E. V. (2007). The effects of pornography are moderated by men’s sexual aggression risk. In D. E. Guinn (Ed.), Pornography: Driving the demand for international sex trafficking? (pp. 125–143). Los Angeles: Captive Daughters Media.Google Scholar
  53. Marechal, A. (2014). ‘Real World’ format twist draws strongest ratings in three seasons. Retrieved from
  54. Martins, N., Weaver, A. J., Yeshua-Katz, D., Lewis, N. H., Tyree, N. E., & Jensen, J. D. (2013). A content analysis of print news coverage of media violence and aggression research. Journal of Communication, 63, 1070–1087. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maxim. (2015). Maxim media kit. Retrieved from
  56. Monk-Turner, E., & Purcell, H. C. (1999). Sexual violence in pornography. Gender Issues, 17, 58–67. doi: 10.1007/s12147-999-0015-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mundorf, N., Allen, M., D’alessio, D., & Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2007). Effects of sexually explicit media. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 181–198). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Nielsen. (2014a). Shifts in viewing: The cross-platform report. Retrieved from
  59. Nielsen. (2014b). The digital consumer. Retrieved from
  60. Office of the Press Secretary. (2012). Presidential Proclamation: National sexual assault awareness and prevention month, 2012. Retrieved from
  61. Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth Acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2007). Adolescents’ exposure to a sexualized media environment and their notions of women as sex objects. Sex Roles, 56, 381–395. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9176-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2009). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit Internet material and notions of women as sex objects: Assessing causality and underlying processes. Journal of Communication, 59, 407–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01422.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reichert, T. (2007). The ageless allure: Sex, media, and marketing. Journal of Promotion Management, 13, 3–11. doi: 10.1300/J057v13n01_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rothman, E. F., Decker, M. R., Miller, E., Reed, E., Raj, A., & Silverman, J. G. (2012). Multi-person sex among a sample of adolescent female urban health clinic patients. Journal of Urban Health, 89, 129–137. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9630-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Russell, D. E. (1988). Pornography and rape: A causal model. Political Psychology, 9, 41–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Seto, M. C., Maric, A., & Barbaree, H. E. (2001). The role of pornography in the etiology of sexual aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 35–53. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(99)00007-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith, D. G. (1976). The social content of pornography. Journal of Communication, 26, 16–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01351.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith, L. (2005). There’s Laguna, and then there’s MTV’s ‘Laguna’. Retrieved from
  71. Stern, D. M. (2005). MTV, reality television and the commodification of female sexuality in the Real World. Media Report to Women, 33, 13–21.Google Scholar
  72. Taylor, L. D. (2005). All for him: Articles about sex in American lad magazines. Sex Roles, 52, 153–163. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-1291-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Taylor, L. D. (2006). College men, their magazines, and sex. Sex Roles, 55, 693–702. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9124-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vega, V., & Malamuth, N. M. (2007). Predicting sexual aggression: The role of pornography in the context of general and specific risk factors. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 104–117. doi: 10.1002/ab.20172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. (2006). Breasts are for men: Media, masculinity ideologies, and men’s beliefs about women’s bodies. Sex Roles, 55, 703–714. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9125-9.Google Scholar
  76. White House Council on Women and Girls. (2014). Rape and sexual assault: A renewed call to action. Retrieved from
  77. Wright, P. J. (2011). Mass media effects on youth sexual behavior: Assessing the claim for causality. Communication Yearbook, 35, 343–386.Google Scholar
  78. Wright, P. J. (2012). Show me the data! Empirical support for the “Centerfold Syndrome”. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 180–198. doi: 10.1037/a0023783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wright, P. J., & Bae, S. (2016). Pornography and male sexual socialization. In Y. J. Wong & S. R. Wester (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of men and masculinities (pp. 551–568). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  80. Wright, P. J., & Funk, M. (2014). Pornography consumption and opposition to affirmative action for women: A prospective study. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 208–221. doi: 10.1177/0361684313498853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wright, P. J., Malamuth, N., & Donnerstein, E. (2012). Research on sex in the media: What do we know about effects on children and adolescents? In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 273–302). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Wright, P. J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2015). Activating the centerfold syndrome: Recency of exposure, sexual explicitness, past exposure to objectifying media. Communication Research, 42, 864–897. doi: 10.1177/0093650213509668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yost, M. R., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2006). Gender differences in the enactment of sociosexuality: An examination of implicit social motives, sexual fantasies, coercive sexual attitudes, and aggressive sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 163–173. doi: 10.1080/00224490609552311.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Zurbriggen, E. L., & Morgan, E. M. (2006). Who wants to marry a millionaire? Reality dating television programs, attitudes toward sex, and sexual behaviors. Sex Roles, 54, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Media School and Kinsey InstituteIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of CommunicologyUniversity of HawaiiManoaUSA

Personalised recommendations