The Association Between Men’s Sexist Attitudes and Facial Hair

Abstract

Facial hair, like many masculine secondary sexual traits, plays a significant role in perceptions of an array of sociosexual traits in men. While there is consensus that beards enhance perceptions of masculinity, age, social dominance, and aggressiveness, the perceived attractiveness of facial hair varies greatly across women. Given the ease with which facial hair can be groomed and removed entirely, why should some men retain beards and others choose to remove them? We hypothesized that men with relatively sexist attitudes would be more likely to allow their facial hair to grow than men with less sexist attitudes. Men from the USA (n = 223) and India (n = 309) completed an online survey measuring demographic variables, ambivalent sexism, and facial hair status. After controlling for demographic variables, men with facial hair were significantly higher in hostile sexism than clean-shaven men; hostile sexism was a significant predictor of facial hair status over and above demographic variables; and facial hair was more frequent among ambivalent and hostile sexists than among benevolent and non-sexists. It is suggested that sexist men choose to grow facial hair because it maximizes sexual dimorphism and augments perceived masculinity and dominance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Addison, W. E. (1989). Beardedness as a factor in perceived masculinity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 921–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 249–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber, N. (2001). Mustache fashion covaries with a good marriage market for women. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25, 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapleau, K., Oswald, D., & Russell, B. (2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57, 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of Man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dixson, A. F., Dixson, B. J., & Anderson, M. J. (2005). Sexual selection and the evolution of visually conspicuous sexually dimorphic traits in male monkeys, apes, and human beings. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16, 1–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixson, B. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2013). The role of facial hair in women’s perceptions of men’s attractiveness, health, masculinity and parenting abilities. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 236–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Ormsby, D. K., & Dixson, A. F. (2014). Eye-tracking women’s preferences for men’s somatotypes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dixson, B. J., & Rantala, M. J. (2015). The role of facial and body hair distribution in women’s judgments of men’s sexual attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0588-z.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dixson, B. J., Tam, J. C., & Awasthy, M. (2013). Do women’s preferences for men’s facial hair change with reproductive status? Behavioral Ecology, 24, 708–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dixson, B. J., & Vasey, P. L. (2012). Beards augment perceptions of men’s age, social status, and aggressiveness, but not attractiveness. Behavioral Ecology, 23, 481–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dixson, B. J., Vasey, P. L., Sagata, K., Sibanda, N., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011). Men’s preferences for women’s breast morphology in New Zealand, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1271–1279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ebling, F. J. (1987). The biology of hair. Dermatologic Clinics, 5, 467–481.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Farthing, M. J. G., Mattei, A. M., Edwards, C. R. W., & Dawson, A. M. (1982). Relationship between plasma testosterone and dihydrotestosterone concentrations and male facial hair growth. British Journal of Dermatology, 107, 559–564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Feinman, S., & Gill, G. W. (1977). Females’ response to males’ beardedness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 533–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In P. Z. Mark (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115–188). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., … Lopez, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.

  21. Grueter, C. C., Isler, K., & Dixson, B. J. (2015). Are primate badges of status adaptive in large groups? Evolution and Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.03.003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hellström, Å., & Tekle, J. (1994). Person perception through facial photographs: Effects of glasses, hair, and beard on judgments of occupation and personal qualities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 693–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hill, A. K., Hunt, J., Welling, L. L., Cárdenas, R. A., Rotella, M. A., … Puts D. A. (2013). Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men’s traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 334–341.

  24. Janif, Z. J., Brooks, R. C., & Dixson, B. J. (2014). Negative frequency-dependent preferences and variation in male facial hair. Biology Letters, 10, 20130958.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones, D. (1996). Physical attractiveness and the theory of sexual selection. Ann Arbor, MI: Museum of Anthropology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kenny, C. T., & Fletcher, D. (1973). Effects of beardedness on person perceptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 413–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Knussmann, R., & Christiansen, K. (1989). Attributes of masculinity and androgen level. Homo, 39, 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mannes, A. E. (2013). Shorn scalps and perceptions of male dominance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McCreary, D. R., Saucier, D. M., & Courtenay, W. H. (2005). The drive for muscularity and masculinity: Testing the associations among gender-role traits, behaviors, attitudes, and conflict. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6, 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Muscarella, F., & Cunningham, M. R. (1996). The evolutionary significance and social perception of male pattern baldness and facial hair. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Neave, N., & Shields, K. (2008). The effects of facial hair manipulation on female perceptions of attractiveness, masculinity, and dominance in male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 373–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 11087–11092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pancer, S. M., & Meindl, J. R. (1978). Length of hair and beardedness as determinants of personality impressions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 1328–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pellegrini, R. J. (1973). Impressions of the male personality as a function of beardedness. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 10, 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Peterkin, A. (2001). One thousand beards: A cultural history of facial hair. Vancouver, BC: Arsenal Pulp Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pope, H., Phillips, K. A., & Olivardia, R. (2000). The Adonis complex: The secret crisis of male body obsession. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Randall, V. A. (2008). Androgens and hair growth. Dermatologic Therapy, 21, 314–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Reed, J. A., & Blunk, E. M. (1990). The influence of facial hair on impression formation. Social Behavior and Personality, 18, 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Reynolds, R. (1949). Beards: Their social standing, religious involvements, decorative possibilities, and value in offence and defence through the ages. New York: Doubleday & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Robinson, D. E. (1976). Fashions in shaving and trimming of the beard: The men of the Illustrated London News, 1842-1972. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 1133–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Roll, S., & Verinis, J. S. (1971). Stereotypes of scalp and facial hair as measured by the semantic differential. Psychological Reports, 28, 975–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Russell, B., & Trigg, K. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Yalçın, Z., & Glick, P. (2007). Ambivalent sexism, belief in a just world, and empathy as predictors of Turkish students’ attitudes toward rape victims. Sex Roles, 57, 889–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schmitt, D. P., & Rohde, P. A. (2013). The human polygyny index and its ecological correlates: Testing sexual selection and life history theory at the cross-national level. Social Science Quarterly, 94, 1159–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stanistreet, D., Bambra, C., & Scott-Samuel, A. (2005). Is patriarchy the source of men’s higher mortality? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 873–876.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Stanistreet, D., Swami, V., Pope, D., Bambra, C., & Scott-Samuel, A. (2007). Women’s empowerment and violent death among women and men in Europe: An ecological study. Journal of Men’s Health & Gender, 4, 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sutherland, C. A. M., Oldmeadow, J. A., Santos, I. M., Towler, J., Burt, M. D., & Young, A. W. (2013). Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model. Cognition, 127, 105–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Swami, V., Neofytou, R. V., Jablonska, J., Thirlwell, H., Taylor, D., & McCreary, D. R. (2013a). Social dominance orientation predicts drive for muscularity among British men. Body Image, 10, 653–656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Swami, V., Pietschnig, J., Stewart, N., Nader, I. W., Stieger, S., Shannon, S., & Voracek, M. (2013b). Blame it on patriarchy: More sexist attitudes are associated with stronger consideration of cosmetic surgery for oneself and one’s partner. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 1221–1229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2013). Men’s oppressive beliefs predict their breast size preferences in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1199–1207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Swami, V., & Voracek, M. (2013). Associations among men’s sexist attitudes, objectification of women, and their own drive for muscularity. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 168–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 455–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. van Honk, J., Bos, P. A., & Terburg, D. (2014). Testosterone and dominance in humans: Behavioral and brain mechanisms. New Frontiers in Social Neuroscience, 21, 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wogalter, M. S., & Hosie, J. A. (1991). Effects of cranial and facial hair on perceptions of age and person. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 589–591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wood, D. R. (1986). Self-perceived masculinity between bearded and nonbearded males. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 769–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian A. Oldmeadow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oldmeadow, J.A., Dixson, B.J. The Association Between Men’s Sexist Attitudes and Facial Hair. Arch Sex Behav 45, 891–899 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0637-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Facial hair
  • Ambivalent sexism
  • Masculinity
  • Social dominance