An Exploratory Study of a New Kink Activity: “Pup Play”

Abstract

This study presents the narratives and experiences of 30 gay and bisexual men who participate in a behavior known as “pup play.” Never empirically studied before, we use in-depth interviews and a modified form of grounded theory to describe the dynamics of pup play and develop a conceptual framework with which to understand it. We discuss the dynamics of pup play, demonstrating that it primarily consists of mimicking the behaviors and adopting the role of a dog. We show that the majority of participants use pup play for sexual satisfaction. It is also a form of relaxation, demonstrated primarily through the existence of a “headspace.” We classify pup play as a kink, and find no evidence for the framing of it as a form of zoophilia. We call for further research on pup play as a sexual kink and leisure activity from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aggrawal, A. (2011). A new classification of zoophilia. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 18, 73–78. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2011.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Attwood, F. (2006). Sexed up: Theorizing the sexualization of culture. Sexualities, 9, 77–94. doi:10.1177/1363460706053336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Attwood, F., & Smith, C. (2010). Extreme concern: Regulating ‘dangerous pictures’ in the United Kingdom. Journal of Law and Society, 37, 171–188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00500.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Attwood, F., & Smith, C. (2013). More sex! Better sex! Sex is fucking brilliant! Sex, sex, sex, SEX. In T. Blackwood (Ed.), Routledge handbook of leisure studies (pp. 325–342). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bezreh, T., Weinberg, T. S., & Edgar, T. (2012). BDSM disclosure and stigma management. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7, 37–61. doi:10.1080/15546128.2012.650984.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bieschke, M. (2015, February). Young gays are sniffing out the pup life. Vice. Retrieved from http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/young-gays-are-sniffing-out-the-pup-life-979.

  8. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bogle, K. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaline, E. (2010). The construction, maintenance, and evolution of gay SM sexualities and sexual identities. Sexualities, 13, 338–356. doi:10.1177/1363460709363323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 (c4) (UK).

  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Daniels, M. (2003). Woof! Perspectives into the erotic care & training of the human dog. Austin, TX: Nazca Plains.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edelman, B. (2009). Markets red light states: Who buys online adult entertainment? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23, 209–220. doi:10.1257/jep.23.1.209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Elkington, S., & Stebbins, R. A. (2014). The serious leisure perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Evans, A., & Riley, S. (2014). Technologies of sexiness. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fedoroff, J., Fishell, A., & Fedoroff, B. (1999). A case series of women evaluated for paraphilic sexual disorders. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 8, 127–140.

  21. Frank, K. (2013). Plays well in groups: A journey through the world of group sex. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gerbasi, K., Bernstein, P., Conway, S., Scaletta, L., Privitera, A., Paolone, N., & Higner, J. (2008). Furries from A to Z (Anthropomorphism to Zoomorphism). Society and Animals, 16, 197–222. doi:10.1163/1568533008X323376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gudelunas, D. (2012). There’s an app for that: The uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Sexuality and Culture, 16, 347–365. doi:10.1007/s12119-012-9127-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heo, J., Lee, Y., McCormick, B., & Pedersen, P. (2010). Daily experience of serious leisure, flow and subjective well-being of older adults. Leisure Studies, 29, 207–225. doi:10.1080/02614360903434092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. International Puppy Contest. (2015, August 8). Retrieved from http://internationalpuppycontest.com/default.html.

  27. Irvine, J. (2014). Is sexuality research ‘dirty work’? Institutionalized stigma in the production of sexual knowledge. Sexualities, 17, 632–656. doi:10.1177/1363460713516338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Keleher, A., & Smith, E. (2012). Growing support for gay and lesbian equality since 1990. Journal of Homosexuality, 59, 1307–1326. doi:10.1080/00918369.2012.720540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelly, J. (2012). Leisure (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Khan, U. (2014). Vicarious kinks: S/M in the socio-legal imaginary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Langdridge, D. (2006). Voices from the margins: Sadomasochism and sexual citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 10, 373–389. doi:10.1080/13621020600857940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Langdridge, D., & Barker, M. (Eds.). (2007). Safe, sane and consensual. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lyons, A., & Hosking, W. (2014). Health disparities among common subcultural identities of young gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1621–1635. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0315-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McCormack, M. (2014). Innovative sampling and participant recruitment in sexuality research. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 31, 475–481. doi:10.1177/0265407514522889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McNair, B. (2013). Porno? Chic! How pornography changed the world and made it a better place. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Moser, C., & Kleinplatz, P. (2005). DSM-IV-TR and the paraphilias: An argument for removal. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 17, 91–109. doi:10.1300/J056v17n03_05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Moser, C., & Kleinplatz, P. (2006). Introduction: The state of our knowledge. Journal of Homosexuality, 50, 1–15. doi:10.1300/J082v50n02_01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Newmahr, S. (2010). Rethinking kink: Sadomasochism as serious leisure. Qualitative Sociology, 33, 313–331. doi:10.1007/s11133-010-9158-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Newmahr, S. (2011). Playing on the edge: Sadomasochism, risk and intimacy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ortmann, D., & Sprott, R. (2013). Sexual outsiders: Understanding BDSM sexualities and communities. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Puppy play 101. (2015, April). Retrieved from http://nepups.org/drupal/node/14.

  42. Rehor, J. (2015). Sensual, erotic, and sexual behaviors of women from the “kink” community. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 825–836. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0524-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger (pp. 267–319). Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rubin, G. (1991). The catacombs: A temple of the butthole. In M. Thompson (Ed.), Leatherfold: Radical sex, people, politics and practice (pp. 119–141). Boston: Alyson.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rubin, G. (2011). Deviations: A Gayle Rubin Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sandnabba, N., Santtila, P., & Nordling, N. (1999). Sexual behavior and social adaptation among sadomasochistically-oriented males. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 273–282. doi:10.1080/00224499909551997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Soh, D., & Cantor, J. (2015). A peek inside a furry convention [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1–2. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0423-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Stebbins, R. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stebbins, R. (2007). Serious leisure. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stebbins, R. (2010). Flow in serious leisure: Nature and prevalence. Leisure Studies Association Newsletter87, 21–23. Retrieved from http://www.seriousleisure.net/uploads/8/3/3/8/8338986/reflections25.pdf.

  51. Taylor, G., & Ussher, J. (2001). Making sense of S&M: A discourse analytic account. Sexualities, 4, 293–314. doi:10.1177/136346001004003002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tinsley, H., & Eldredge, B. (1995). Psychological benefits of leisure participation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 123–132. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Treas, J., Liu, J., & Gubernskaya, Z. (2014). Cross-national evidence on the deinstitutionalization of marriage. Demographic Research, 30, 1495–1526. doi:10.4054/DemRes.30.54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Twenge, J. M., Sherman, R. A., & Wells, B. E. (2015). Changes in American adults’ sexual behavior and attitudes, 1972-2012. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 2273–2285. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-054-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Urquhart, C. (2013). Grounded theory for qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Weinberg, M. (2015). Introduction. In M. Weinberg & S. Newmahr (Eds.), Selves, symbols and sexualities (pp. xii–xxi). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Weinberg, M., Williams, C., & Moser, C. (1984). The social constituents of sadomasochism. Social Problems, 31, 379–389. doi:10.1525/sp.1984.31.4.03a00020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Weiss, M. (2011). Techniques of pleasure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. What is human pup play? (2015, April 5). Retrieved from http://www.siriuspup.net/what-is-human-pup-play/.

  60. Williams, D., Thomas, J., Prior, E., & Christensen, M. (2014). From “SSC” and “RACK” to the “4Cs”: Introducing a new framework for negotiating BDSM participation. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality17. Retrieved from http://www.ejhs.org/volume17/BDSM.html.

  61. Williams, D., & Weinberg, M. (2006). Zoophilia in men: A study of sexual interest in animals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 523–535. doi:10.1023/A:1026085410617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. World Pup Play. (2015, August). Retrieved from http://www.siriuspup.net/world-pup-play/.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liam Wignall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wignall, L., McCormack, M. An Exploratory Study of a New Kink Activity: “Pup Play”. Arch Sex Behav 46, 801–811 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0636-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • BDSM
  • Kink
  • Leisure
  • Pup play
  • Role-play