Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 1039–1050 | Cite as

A Latent Class Analysis of Heterosexual Young Men’s Masculinities

  • Erin A. Casey
  • N. Tatiana Masters
  • Blair Beadnell
  • Elizabeth A. Wells
  • Diane M. Morrison
  • Marilyn J. Hoppe
Original Paper

Abstract

Parallel bodies of research have described the diverse and complex ways that men understand and construct their masculine identities (often termed “masculinities”) and, separately, how adherence to traditional notions of masculinity places men at risk for negative sexual and health outcomes. The goal of this analysis was to bring together these two streams of inquiry. Using data from a national, online sample of 555 heterosexually active young men, we employed latent class analysis (LCA) to detect patterns of masculine identities based on men’s endorsement of behavioral and attitudinal indicators of “dominant” masculinity, including sexual attitudes and behaviors. LCA identified four conceptually distinct masculine identity profiles. Two groups, termed the Normative and Normative/Male Activities groups, respectively, constituted 88 % of the sample and were characterized by low levels of adherence to attitudes, sexual scripts, and behaviors consistent with “dominant” masculinity, but differed in their levels of engagement in male-oriented activities (e.g., sports teams). Only eight percent of the sample comprised a masculinity profile consistent with “traditional” ideas about masculinity; this group was labeled Misogynistic because of high levels of sexual assault and violence toward female partners. The remaining four percent constituted a Sex-Focused group, characterized by high numbers of sexual partners, but relatively low endorsement of other indicators of traditional masculinity. Follow-up analyses showed a small number of differences across groups on sexual and substance use health indicators. Findings have implications for sexual and behavioral health interventions and suggest that very few young men embody or endorse rigidly traditional forms of masculinity.

Keywords

Masculinities Sexual health Gender roles Violence against women Latent class analysis 

References

  1. Addis, M. E., & Cohane, G. H. (2005). Social scientific paradigms of masculinity and their implications for research and practice in men’s mental health. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 633–647.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (2008). Inclusive masculinity in a fraternal setting. Men and Masculinities, 10, 604–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnett, J. J. (2003). Conceptions of the transition to adulthood among emerging adults in American ethnic groups. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development, 100, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asparouhov, T. (2013). Mplus discussion board posting. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/13/17816.html?1386451142.
  5. Barker, G. T. (2005). Dying to be men: Youth, masculinity and social exclusion. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beadnell, B., Baker, S. A., Gillmore, M. R., Morrison, D. M., Huang, B., & Stielstra, S. (2008). The theory of reasoned action and the role of external factors on heterosexual men’s monogamy and condom use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 97–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beadnell, B., Morrison, D. M., Wilson, A., Wells, E. A., Murowchick, E., Hoppe, M., et al. (2005). Condom use, frequency of sex, and number of partners: Multidimensional characterization of adolescent sexual risk-taking. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 192–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowleg, L., Teti, M., Massie, J. S., Patel, A., Malebrance, D. J., & Tschann, J. M. (2011). “What does it take to be a man? What is a real man?”: Ideologies of masculinity and HIV sexual risk among black heterosexual men. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 13, 545–559.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, J., Rosenn, I., Backstrom, L., & Marlow, C. (2010). ePluribus: Ethnicity on social networks. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
  10. Chu, J. Y., Porche, M. V., & Tolman, D. L. (2005). The Adolescent Masculinity Ideology in Relationships Scale: Development and validation of a new measure for boys. Men and Masculinities, 8, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1385–1401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. DeJong, W., Schnieder, S. K., Gomberg-Towvim, L., Murphy, M. J., Doerr, E. E., Simonsen, N. R., et al. (2006). A multisite randomized trial of social norms marketing campaigns to reduce college student drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 868–879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Doull, M., Oliffe, J., Knight, R., & Shoveller, J. A. (2013). Sex and straight young men: Challenging and endorsing hegemonic masculinities and gender regimes. Men and Masculinities, 16, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dworkin, S. L., Fullilove, R. E., & Peacock, D. (2009). Are HIV/AIDS prevention interventions for heterosexually active men in the United States gender-specific? American Journal of Public Health, 99, 981–984.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Entwisle, D. R., & Astone, N. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth’s race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Development, 65, 1521–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evans, J., Frank, B., Oliffe, J. L., & Gregory, D. (2011). Health, illness, men, and masculinities (HIMM): A theoretical framework for understanding men and their health. Journal of Men’s Health, 8, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fabiano, P. M., Perkins, H. W., Berkowitz, A. D., Linkenbach, J., & Stark, C. (2003). Engaging men as social justice allies in ending violence against women: Evidence for a social norms approach. Journal of American College Health, 52, 105–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Flood, M., & Pease, B. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 10, 125–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hagman, B. T., Kuerbis, A. N., Morgenstern, J., Bux, D. A., Parsons, J. T., & Heidinger, B. E. (2009). An item response theory (IRT) analysis of the Short Inventory of Problems-Alcohol and Drugs (SIP-AD) among non-treatment seeking men who have sex with men: Evidence for a shortened 10-item SIP-AD. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 948–954.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Heasley, R. (2005). Queer masculinities of straight men: A typology. Men and Masculinities, 7, 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jewkes, R., Flood, M., & Lang, J. (2015). From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: A conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. Lancet, 385, 1580–1589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalichman, S. C., & Rompa, D. (1995). Sexual sensation seeking and sexual compulsivity scales: Validity, and predicting HIV risk behavior. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 586–601.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kerrigan, D., Andrinopoulos, K., Johnson, R., Parham, P., Thomas, T., & Ellen, J. M. (2007). Staying strong: Gender ideologies among African-American adolescents and the implications for HIV/STI prevention. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 172–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Koo, K. H., Stephens, K. A., Lindgren, K. P., & George, W. H. (2012). Misogyny, acculturation, and ethnic identity: Relation to rape-supportive attitudes in Asian American college men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1005–1014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewskil, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lanza, S. T., & Collins, L. M. (2008). A new SAS procedure for latent transition analysis: Transitions in dating and sexual risk behavior. Developmental Psychology, 44, 446–456.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, W. M., & Iwamoto, D. K. (2007). Conformity to masculine norms, Asian values, coping strategies, peer group influences, and substance use among Asian American Men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Locke, B. D., & Mahalik, J. R. (2005). Examining masculinity norms, problem drinking and athletic involvement as predictors of sexual aggression in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Gottfried, M., Scott, P. J., & Freitas, G. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martino, W. (1999). ”Cool boys”, “party animals”, “squids” and “poofters”: Interrogating the dynamics and politics of adolescent masculinities in school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Masters, T., Casey, E. A., Morrison, D., & Wells, E. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexual men and women: Processes of conformity and change. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 409–420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. McCormack, M. (2012). The declining significance of homophobia: How teenage boys are redefining masculinity and homophobia. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morrison, D. M., Masters, N. T., Wells, E. A., Casey, E. A., Beadnell, B., & Hoppe, M. J. (2015). “He enjoys giving her pleasure”: Diversity and complexity in young men’s sexual scripts. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 655–668.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Murnen, S. K., & Kohlman, M. H. (2007). Athletic participation, fraternity membership, and sexual aggression among college men: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 57, 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Múthen, B. O., & Múthen, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882–891.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Sullivan, L. F., Hoffman, S., Harrison, A., & Dolezal, C. (2006). Men, multiple sexual partners, and young adults’ sexual relationships: Understanding the role of gender in the study of risk. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 695–708.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Pascoe, C. J. (2003). Multiple masculinities? Teenage boys talk about jocks and gender. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 1423–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2013). Demographics of internet users. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Trend-Data-(Adults)/Whos-Online.aspx.
  42. Reidy, D. E., Berke, D. S., Gentile, B., & Zeichner, A. (2014). Man enough? Masculine discrepancy stress and intimate partner violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Santana, M. C., Raj, A., Decker, M. R., LaMarche, A., & Silverman, J. (2006). Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 575–585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1995). Masculinity ideologies: A review of research instrumentation on men and masculinities. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 129–163). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  47. U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Enrollment rates. Retrieved August 20, 2014 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_302.60.asp.
  48. Vandello, J. A., & Bosson, J. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 14, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wade, J. C. (2008). Masculinity ideology, male reference group identity dependence and African American men’s health-related attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 9, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White, J. W., & Smith, P. H. (2004). Sexual assault perpetration and re-perpetration: From adolescence to young adulthood. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 182–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. World Health Organization. (2007). Engaging men and boys in changing gender-based inequity in health: Evidence from programme interventions. Geneva: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin A. Casey
    • 1
  • N. Tatiana Masters
    • 2
  • Blair Beadnell
    • 2
  • Elizabeth A. Wells
    • 2
  • Diane M. Morrison
    • 2
  • Marilyn J. Hoppe
    • 2
  1. 1.Social Work ProgramUniversity of WashingtonTacomaUSA
  2. 2.School of Social WorkUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations