The Impact of Sexual Arousal on Sexual Risk-Taking and Decision-Making in Men and Women

Abstract

Sexual arousal has emerged as an important contextual feature in sexual encounters that can impact safer-sex decision-making. We conducted two experiments that investigated the effects of sexual arousal among male and female participants. Experiment 1 (N = 144) examined the impact of sexual around on sexual health decision-making. Sexually explicit and neutral video clips as well as hypothetical romantic scenarios were used to evaluate the effects of sexual arousal on sexual risk-taking intentions. Men and women who reported higher levels of sexual arousal also displayed greater intentions to participate in risky sexual behavior (e.g., unprotected sex with a new sex partner). Experiment 2 (N = 122) examined the impact of sexual arousal on general risk-taking, using the same videos clips as in Experiment 1 and a modified version of a computerized Blackjack card game. Participants were offered a chance to make either a risky play or a safe play during ambiguous conditions. Increased sexual arousal in Experiment 2 was associated with impulsivity and a greater willingness to make risky plays in the Blackjack game. These findings suggest that, in situations where there are strong sexually visceral cues, both men and women experiencing strong sexual arousal may have lower inhibitions and may experience impaired decision-making. This phenomenon may have an impact during sexual encounters and may contribute to a failure to use appropriate prophylactic protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    An average sexual arousal score that was below the median was chosen as the cut-off because participants tend to underestimate their physiological experience of sexual arousal when asked to report their subjective sexual arousal level (Chivers, Seto, Lalumiere, Laan, & Grimbos, 2010).

  2. 2.

    Outcome analyses were also conducted using the full sample that did not exclude participants based on sexual arousal cut-off scores. As would be expected, results were weaker, with means trending in the anticipated direction but failing to reach significance.

  3. 3.

    A linear regression analysis was also completed for both Experiment 1 and 2, using the full samples (pre-cut-off) to examine sexual arousal as a continuous measure. As expected, the results were weaker when the full sample was used. We chose to use condition as a dichotomizing variable, much like Huberman, Suschinsky, Lalumiere, and Chivers (2013) in order to examine a treatment effect.

  4. 4.

    However, it should be noted that, from a biological perspective, men are at a lower risk for contracting HIV and some STIs (e.g., gonorrhea and herpes) from heterosexual activity than women (Norris et al., 2004).

References

  1. Abbey, A., Saenz, C., & Buck, P. O. (2005). The cumulative effects of acute alcohol consumption, individual differences and situational perceptions on sexual decision making. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66, 82–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, M. D., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 391–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanton, H., & Gerrard, M. (1997). Effect of sexual motivation on men’s risk perception for sexually transmitted disease: There must be 50 ways to justify a lover. Health Psychology, 16, 374–379.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boldero, J., Moore, S., & Rosenthal, D. (1992). Intention, context, and safe sex: Australian adolescents’ responses to AIDS. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1374–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Canin, L., Dolcini, M. M., & Adler, N. E. (1999). Barriers to and facilitators of HIV-STD behavior change: Intrapersonal and relationship-based factors. Review of General Psychology, 3, 338–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1108–1121.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumiere, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010). Agreement of genital and subjective measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 5–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A., Epstien, E. B., Jacobson, J. A., & Macdonald, T. K. (2006). Visceral influences on risk-taking behavior. Journal of Bahvioral Decision Making, 19, 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. George, W. H., Davis, K. C., Norris, J., Heiman, J. R., Stoner, S. A., Schacht, R. L., … Kajumulo, K. F. (2007). Indirect effects of acute alcohol intoxication on sexual risk-taking: The roles of subjective and physiological sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 498–513.

  13. Harvey, S. M., Beckman, L. J., Gerend, M. A., Bird, S. T., Posner, S., & Huszti, H. C. (2006). A conceptual model of women's condom use intentions: Integrating intrapersonal and relationship factors. AIDS Care, 18, 698–709.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harvey, S. M., Thorburn Bird, S., Galavotti, C., Duncan, E. A. W., & Greenburg, D. (2002). Relationship power, sexual decision making and condom use among women at risk for HIV/STDs. Women and Health, 36, 69–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huberman, J., Suschinsky, K. D., Lalumière, M. L., & Chivers, M. L. (2013). Relationship between impression management and three measures of women’s self-reported sexual arousal. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 45, 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. MacDonald, T. K., & Hynie, M. (2008). Ambivalence and unprotected sex: Failure to predict sexual activity and decreased condom use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1092–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayer, J. D., & Gaschke, Y. N. (1988). The experience and meta-experience of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 102–111.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Middlesex-London Health Unit. (2007). Adventures in sex cty. Retrieved from http://www.healthunit.com/article.aspx?ID=15160.

  21. Morris, J., & Stanton, A. (2008). WALL-E (motion picture). United States: Walt Disney Pictures.

  22. Norris, J., Masters, N. T., & Zawacki, T. (2004). Cognitive mediation of women’s sexual decision making: The influence of alcohol, contextual factors, and background variables. Annual Review of Sex Research, 15, 258–296.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Norris, J., Stoner, S. A., Hessler, D. M., Zawacki, T., Davis, K. C., George, W. H., … Abdallah, D. A. (2009). Influences of sexual sensation seeking, alcohol consumptions, and sexual arousal on women’s behavioral intentions related to having unprotected sex. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23, 14–22.

  24. Patel, V. L., Gutnik, L. A., Yoskowitz, N. A., O’Sullivan, L. F., & Kaufman, D. R. (2006). Patterns for reasoning and decision making about condom use my urban college students. AIDS Care, 18, 918–930.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Prause, N., Staley, C., & Finn, P. (2011). The effects of acute ethanol consumptions on sexual response and sexual risk-taking intent. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 40, 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rotermann, M., & McKay, A. (2009). Condom use at last sexual intercourse among unmarried, not living common-law 20- to 34-year-old Canadian young adults. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 13, 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Royalle, C. (2007). Under the covers (Motion Picture). United States: Adam & Eve Productions.

  28. Saewyc, E. M., Taylor, D., Homma, Y., & Ogilvie, G. (2008). Trends in sexual health and risk behaviours among adolescent students in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 17, 1–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Santelli, J., Sandfort, T. G., & Orr, M. (2009). U.S./European differences in condom use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44, 306. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.017.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sheeran, P., Abraham, C., & Orbell, S. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 90–132.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (1998). Do intentions predict condom use? Meta-analysis and examination of six moderator variables. Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Skakoon-Sparling, S., & Cramer, K. (2014). Paratelic/telic state, sexual arousal, and sexual risk-taking in university students. Journal of Motivation, Emotion, and Personality, 2, 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Steele, C. M., & Josephs, R. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia: Its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921–933.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Strong, D. A., Bancroft, J., Carnes, L. A., Davis, L. A., & Kennedy, J. (2005). The impact of sexual arousal on sexual risk-taking: A qualitative study. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 185–191.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Suschinsky, K. D., Lalumière, M. L., & Chivers, M. L. (2009). Sex differences in patterns of genital sexual arousal: Measurement artefacts or true phenomena? Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 38, 559–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Suvivuo, P., Tossavainen, K., & Kontula, O. (2009). Contraceptive use and non-use among teenage girls in a sexually motivated situation. Sex Education, 9, 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Troth, A., & Peterson, C. C. (2000). Factors predicting safe-sex talk and condom use in early sexual relationships. Health Communication, 12, 195–218.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Turchik, J. A., & Gidycz, C. A. (2012). Exploring the intention-behavior relationship in the prediction of sexual risk behavior: Can it be strengthened? Journal of Sex Research, 49, 50–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilson, M., Daly, M., Gordon, S., & Pratt, A. (1996). Sex differences in valuation of the environment? Population and Environment, 18, 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shayna Skakoon-Sparling.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 1

Table 1 Risky Sexual Decision-Making Scale (Experiment 1)—used with a 10 point Likert scale (1 = not at all likely, 10 = extremely likely)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skakoon-Sparling, S., Cramer, K.M. & Shuper, P.A. The Impact of Sexual Arousal on Sexual Risk-Taking and Decision-Making in Men and Women. Arch Sex Behav 45, 33–42 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0589-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sexual arousal
  • Sexual decision-making
  • Risk-taking
  • Safer-sex behavior
  • Sexual risk-taking intentions