Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 33–42 | Cite as

The Impact of Sexual Arousal on Sexual Risk-Taking and Decision-Making in Men and Women

  • Shayna Skakoon-SparlingEmail author
  • Kenneth M. Cramer
  • Paul A. Shuper
Original Paper


Sexual arousal has emerged as an important contextual feature in sexual encounters that can impact safer-sex decision-making. We conducted two experiments that investigated the effects of sexual arousal among male and female participants. Experiment 1 (N = 144) examined the impact of sexual around on sexual health decision-making. Sexually explicit and neutral video clips as well as hypothetical romantic scenarios were used to evaluate the effects of sexual arousal on sexual risk-taking intentions. Men and women who reported higher levels of sexual arousal also displayed greater intentions to participate in risky sexual behavior (e.g., unprotected sex with a new sex partner). Experiment 2 (N = 122) examined the impact of sexual arousal on general risk-taking, using the same videos clips as in Experiment 1 and a modified version of a computerized Blackjack card game. Participants were offered a chance to make either a risky play or a safe play during ambiguous conditions. Increased sexual arousal in Experiment 2 was associated with impulsivity and a greater willingness to make risky plays in the Blackjack game. These findings suggest that, in situations where there are strong sexually visceral cues, both men and women experiencing strong sexual arousal may have lower inhibitions and may experience impaired decision-making. This phenomenon may have an impact during sexual encounters and may contribute to a failure to use appropriate prophylactic protection.


Sexual arousal Sexual decision-making Risk-taking Safer-sex behavior Sexual risk-taking intentions 


  1. Abbey, A., Saenz, C., & Buck, P. O. (2005). The cumulative effects of acute alcohol consumption, individual differences and situational perceptions on sexual decision making. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66, 82–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, M. D., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 391–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanton, H., & Gerrard, M. (1997). Effect of sexual motivation on men’s risk perception for sexually transmitted disease: There must be 50 ways to justify a lover. Health Psychology, 16, 374–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boldero, J., Moore, S., & Rosenthal, D. (1992). Intention, context, and safe sex: Australian adolescents’ responses to AIDS. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1374–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canin, L., Dolcini, M. M., & Adler, N. E. (1999). Barriers to and facilitators of HIV-STD behavior change: Intrapersonal and relationship-based factors. Review of General Psychology, 3, 338–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1108–1121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumiere, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010). Agreement of genital and subjective measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 5–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A., Epstien, E. B., Jacobson, J. A., & Macdonald, T. K. (2006). Visceral influences on risk-taking behavior. Journal of Bahvioral Decision Making, 19, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. George, W. H., Davis, K. C., Norris, J., Heiman, J. R., Stoner, S. A., Schacht, R. L., … Kajumulo, K. F. (2007). Indirect effects of acute alcohol intoxication on sexual risk-taking: The roles of subjective and physiological sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 498–513.Google Scholar
  13. Harvey, S. M., Beckman, L. J., Gerend, M. A., Bird, S. T., Posner, S., & Huszti, H. C. (2006). A conceptual model of women's condom use intentions: Integrating intrapersonal and relationship factors. AIDS Care, 18, 698–709.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harvey, S. M., Thorburn Bird, S., Galavotti, C., Duncan, E. A. W., & Greenburg, D. (2002). Relationship power, sexual decision making and condom use among women at risk for HIV/STDs. Women and Health, 36, 69–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huberman, J., Suschinsky, K. D., Lalumière, M. L., & Chivers, M. L. (2013). Relationship between impression management and three measures of women’s self-reported sexual arousal. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 45, 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacDonald, T. K., & Hynie, M. (2008). Ambivalence and unprotected sex: Failure to predict sexual activity and decreased condom use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1092–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mayer, J. D., & Gaschke, Y. N. (1988). The experience and meta-experience of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 102–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Middlesex-London Health Unit. (2007). Adventures in sex cty. Retrieved from
  21. Morris, J., & Stanton, A. (2008). WALL-E (motion picture). United States: Walt Disney Pictures.Google Scholar
  22. Norris, J., Masters, N. T., & Zawacki, T. (2004). Cognitive mediation of women’s sexual decision making: The influence of alcohol, contextual factors, and background variables. Annual Review of Sex Research, 15, 258–296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Norris, J., Stoner, S. A., Hessler, D. M., Zawacki, T., Davis, K. C., George, W. H., … Abdallah, D. A. (2009). Influences of sexual sensation seeking, alcohol consumptions, and sexual arousal on women’s behavioral intentions related to having unprotected sex. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23, 14–22.Google Scholar
  24. Patel, V. L., Gutnik, L. A., Yoskowitz, N. A., O’Sullivan, L. F., & Kaufman, D. R. (2006). Patterns for reasoning and decision making about condom use my urban college students. AIDS Care, 18, 918–930.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prause, N., Staley, C., & Finn, P. (2011). The effects of acute ethanol consumptions on sexual response and sexual risk-taking intent. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 40, 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rotermann, M., & McKay, A. (2009). Condom use at last sexual intercourse among unmarried, not living common-law 20- to 34-year-old Canadian young adults. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 13, 75–87.Google Scholar
  27. Royalle, C. (2007). Under the covers (Motion Picture). United States: Adam & Eve Productions.Google Scholar
  28. Saewyc, E. M., Taylor, D., Homma, Y., & Ogilvie, G. (2008). Trends in sexual health and risk behaviours among adolescent students in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 17, 1–13.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Santelli, J., Sandfort, T. G., & Orr, M. (2009). U.S./European differences in condom use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44, 306. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheeran, P., Abraham, C., & Orbell, S. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 90–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (1998). Do intentions predict condom use? Meta-analysis and examination of six moderator variables. Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Skakoon-Sparling, S., & Cramer, K. (2014). Paratelic/telic state, sexual arousal, and sexual risk-taking in university students. Journal of Motivation, Emotion, and Personality, 2, 32–37.Google Scholar
  33. Steele, C. M., & Josephs, R. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia: Its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921–933.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Strong, D. A., Bancroft, J., Carnes, L. A., Davis, L. A., & Kennedy, J. (2005). The impact of sexual arousal on sexual risk-taking: A qualitative study. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 185–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Suschinsky, K. D., Lalumière, M. L., & Chivers, M. L. (2009). Sex differences in patterns of genital sexual arousal: Measurement artefacts or true phenomena? Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 38, 559–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Suvivuo, P., Tossavainen, K., & Kontula, O. (2009). Contraceptive use and non-use among teenage girls in a sexually motivated situation. Sex Education, 9, 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Troth, A., & Peterson, C. C. (2000). Factors predicting safe-sex talk and condom use in early sexual relationships. Health Communication, 12, 195–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turchik, J. A., & Gidycz, C. A. (2012). Exploring the intention-behavior relationship in the prediction of sexual risk behavior: Can it be strengthened? Journal of Sex Research, 49, 50–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson, M., Daly, M., Gordon, S., & Pratt, A. (1996). Sex differences in valuation of the environment? Population and Environment, 18, 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shayna Skakoon-Sparling
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Kenneth M. Cramer
    • 1
  • Paul A. Shuper
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada
  2. 2.Social and Epidemiological ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations