The Role of Facial and Body Hair Distribution in Women’s Judgments of Men’s Sexual Attractiveness
- 2.4k Downloads
Facial and body hair are some of the most visually conspicuous and sexually dimorphic of all men’s secondary sexual traits. Both are androgen dependent, requiring the conversion of testosterone into dihydrotestosterone via the enzyme 5α reductase 2 for their expression. While previous studies on the attractiveness of facial and body hair are equivocal, none have accounted as to how natural variation in their distribution may influence male sexual attractiveness. In the present study, we quantified men’s facial and body hair distribution as either very light, light, medium, or heavy using natural photographs. We also tested whether women’s fertility influenced their preferences for beards and body hair by comparing preferences among heterosexual women grouped according their fertility (high fertility, low fertility, and contraceptive use). Results showed that men with more evenly and continuously distributed facial hair from the lower jaw connecting to the mustache and covering the cheeks were judged as more sexually attractive than individuals with more patchy facial hair. Men with body hair were less attractive than when clean shaven, with the exception of images depicting some hair around the areolae, pectoral region, and the sternum that were significantly more attractive than clean-shaven bodies. However, there was no effect of fertility on women’s preferences for men’s beard or body hair distribution. These results suggest that the distribution of facial and body hair influences male attractiveness to women, possibly as an indication of masculine development and the synthesis of testosterone into dihydrotestosterone via 5α reductase.
KeywordsFacial hair Body hair Beards Attractiveness Menstrual cycle
We would like to thank the Editor and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped to improve the article. We also thank Rob Brooks for additional comments and suggestions on drafts and subsequent revisions. We are also grateful to all the men who provided the beard and body hair stimuli and all the participants who volunteered to complete surveys.
- DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Frederick, D. A., Haselton, M. G., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Evidence for menstrual cycle shifts in women’s preferences for masculinity: A response to Harris (in press) menstrual cycle and facial preferences reconsidered. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 768–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fleagle, J. G. (2013). Primate adaptation and evolution (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Goodhart, C. B. (1960). The evolutionary significance of human hair patterns and skin colouring. British Association for the Advancement of Science, 17, 53–58.Google Scholar
- Guthrie, R. D. (1970). Evolution of human threat display organs. In T. Dobhansky, M. K. Hecht, & W. C. Steers (Eds.), Evolutionary biology (pp. 257–302). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Hale, G. E., Zhao, X., Hughes, C. L., Burger, H. G., Robertson, D. M., & Fraser, I. S. (2007). Endocrine features of menstrual cycles in middle and late reproductive age and the menopausal transition classified according to the Staging of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW) staging system. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 92, 3060–3067.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hampson, E., & Young, E. A. (2007). Methodological issues in the study of hormone behavior relations in humans: Understanding and monitoring the menstrual cycle. In J. Becker, K. Berkley, N. Geary, E. Hampson, J. Herman, & E. Young (Eds.), Sex differences in the brain: From genes to behavior (pp. 63–78). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harris, C. R., Chabot, A., & Mickes, L. (2013). Shifts in methodology and theory in menstrual cycle research on attraction. Sex Roles, 69, 9–10.Google Scholar
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
- Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 269, 1095–1100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robertson, J. R. (Ed.). (2002). Forensic examination of hair. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar