Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 193–205 | Cite as

Infidelity in Dating Relationships: Gender-Specific Correlates of Face-to-Face and Online Extradyadic Involvement

  • Alexandra Martins
  • Marco Pereira
  • Rita Andrade
  • Frank M. Dattilio
  • Isabel Narciso
  • Maria Cristina Canavarro
Original Paper

Abstract

This study examined the gender-specific correlates of face-to-face and online extradyadic involvement (EDI) in dating relationships. The sample consisted of 561 women (M age = 23.19 years) and 222 men (M age = 23.97 years), all of whom reported being in an exclusive dating relationship for an average of 35 months. Participants completed the following self-report measures: Extradyadic Behavior Inventory, Attitudes toward Infidelity Scale, and Investment Model Scale. During the current relationship, men were more likely than women to report engagement in face-to-face physical/sexual EDI (23.4 vs. 15.5 %) and online sexual EDI (15.3 vs. 4.6 %). Both men and women with a history of infidelity in a prior relationship were more likely to engage in EDI. More positive attitudes toward infidelity, lower relationship satisfaction, lower commitment, and higher quality of alternatives were significantly associated with EDI, regardless of gender. Women reporting infidelity of a partner in a prior relationship were more likely to engage in face-to-face and online emotional EDI; a longer relationship and a younger age at the first sexual encounter were significant correlates of the engagement in face-to-face emotional EDI. Women with higher education were approximately three times more likely to engage in online sexual EDI. Although men and women are converging in terms of overall EDI, men still report higher engagement in physical/sexual extradyadic behaviors, and the correlates of sexual and emotional EDI vary according to gender. This study contributes to a comprehensive approach of factors influencing the likelihood of EDI and encourages future research in this area.

Keywords

Dating relationships Extradyadic involvement Infidelity Gender differences 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was developed within the research line “Relationships, Development & Health” of the R&D Unit CINEICC (Cognitive-Behavioral Center for Research and Intervention), University of Coimbra (PEst-OE/PSI/UI0730/2014). Marco Pereira is supported by a post-doctoral scholarship from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (SFRH/BPD/44435/2008).

References

  1. Adamopoulou, E. (2013). New facts on infidelity. Economic Letters, 121, 458–462. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.09.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, E. S., Atkins, D., Baucom, D., Snyder, D., Gordon, K., & Glass, S. (2005). Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and contextual factors in engaging in and responding to extramarital involvement. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12, 101–130. doi: 10.1093/clipsy/bpi014.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, E. S., & Baucom, D. (2004). Adult attachment and patterns of extradyadic involvement. Family Process, 43, 467–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2004.00035.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, E. S., & Rhoades, G. K. (2008). Not all affairs are created equal: Emotional involvement with an extradyadic partner. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 34, 51–65. doi: 10.1080/00926230701620878.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews, P. W., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, G. F., Haselton, M. G., Thornhill, R., & Neale, M. C. (2008). Sex differences in detecting sexual infidelity. Human Nature, 19, 347–373. doi: 10.1007/s12110-008-9051-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D., & Jacobson, N. (2001). Understanding infidelity: Correlates in a national random sample. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 735–749. doi: 10.1037//0893-3200.15.4.735.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banfield, S., & McCabe, M. (2001). Extra relationship involvement among women: Are they different from men? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 119–142. doi: 10.1023/A:1002773100507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barta, W., & Kiene, S. (2005). Motivations for infidelity in heterosexual dating couples: The roles of gender, personality differences, and sociosexual orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 339–360. doi: 10.1177/0265407505052440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blow, A., & Hartnett, K. (2005a). Infidelity in committed relationships I: A methodological review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 183–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01555.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blow, A., & Hartnett, K. (2005b). Infidelity in committed relationships II: A substantive review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 217–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01556.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boekhout, B. A., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (2003). Exploring infidelity: Developing the Relationship Issues Scale. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 8, 283–306. doi: 10.1080/15325020305882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brand, R., Markey, C., Mills, A., & Hodges, S. (2007). Sex differences in self-reported infidelity and its correlates. Sex Roles, 57, 101–109. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9221-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burdette, A. M., Ellison, C. G., Sherkat, D. E., & Gore, K. A. (2007). Are there religious variations in marital infidelity? Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1553–1581. doi: 10.1177/0192513X07304269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buunk, B. P., & Bakker, A. B. (1995). Extradyadic sex: The role of descriptive and injunctive norms. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 313–318. doi: 10.1080/00224499509551804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buunk, B. P., & Bakker, A. B. (1997). Commitment to the relationship, extradyadic sex, and AIDS preventive behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1241–1257. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01804.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choi, K., Catania, J. A., & Dolcini, M. M. (1994). Extramarital sex and HIV risk behavior among US adults: Results from the National AIDS Behavioral Survey. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 2003–2007. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.84.12.2003.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper, A., Delmonico, D. L., & Burg, R. (2000). Cybersex users, abusers, and compulsives: New findings and implications. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7, 5–29. doi: 10.1080/10720160008400205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Roda, A. B. L., Martínez-Íñigo, D., de Paúl, P., & Yela, C. (1999). Romantic beliefs and myths in Spain. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2, 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeGenova, M. K., & Rice, F. P. (2005). Intimate relationships, marriages, and families (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Docan-Morgan, T., & Docan, C. A. (2007). Internet infidelity: Double standards and the differing views of women and men. Communication Quarterly, 55, 317–342. doi: 10.1080/01463370701492519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drigotas, S. M., Safstrom, A., & Gentilia, T. (1999). An investment model prediction of dating infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 509–524. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitudes structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. I, pp. 269–322). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Forste, R., & Tanfer, K. (1996). Sexual exclusivity among dating, cohabiting, and married women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1985). Sex differences in type of extramarital involvement and marital dissatisfaction. Sex Roles, 12, 1101–1120. doi: 10.1007/BF00288108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1992). Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 361–387. doi: 10.1080/00224499209551654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haavio-Mannila, E., & Kontula, O. (2003). Single and double sexual standards in Finland, Estonia, and St. Petersburg. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 36–49. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hansen, G. L. (1987). Extradyadic relations during courtship. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 382–390. doi: 10.1080/00224498709551376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris, C. R. (2002). Sexual and romantic jealousy in heterosexual and homosexual adults. Psychological Science, 13, 7–12. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harvey, R., & Hackathorn, J. (2011). Sexual double standards: Bias in perceptions of cyber-infidelity. Sexuality and Culture, 15, 100–113. doi: 10.1007/s12119-010-9082-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Havlicek, J., Husarova, B., Rezacova, V., & Klapilova, K. (2011). Correlates of extra-dyadic sex in Czech heterosexual couples: Does sexual behavior of parents matter? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1153–1163. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9869-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henline, B. H., Lamke, L. K., & Howard, M. D. (2007). Exploring perceptions of online infidelity. Personal Relationships, 14, 113–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00144.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Impett, E. A., Beals, K. P., & Peplau, L. A. (2001/2002). Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples. Current Psychology, 20, 312–326. doi: 10.1007/s12144-001-1014-3.
  34. Kelly, J., & Bazzini, D. G. (2001). Gender, sexual experience, and the sexual double standard: Evaluations of female contraceptive behavior. Sex Roles, 45, 785–799. doi: 10.1023/A:1015640419862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kontula, O., & Haavio-Mannila, E. (1995). Sexual pleasures: Enhancement of sex life in Finland, 1971-1992. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  36. Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57. doi: 10.1111/1475-6811.00035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewin, B. (2000). Sexual intercourse and partners. In B. Lewin (Ed.), Sex in Sweden: On the Swedish sexual life (pp. 76–79). Stockholm: National Institute of Public Health.Google Scholar
  38. Liu, C. (2000). A theory of marital sexual life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 363–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00363.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luo, S., Cartun, M., & Snider, A. (2010). Assessing extradyadic behavior: A review, a new measure, and two new models. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mark, K., Janssen, E., & Milhausen, R. (2011). Infidelity in heterosexual couples: Demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extradyadic sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 971–982. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9771-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martins, A., Pereira, M., & Canavarro, M. C. (2014). Comportamentos extra-diádicos nas relações de namoro: Diferenças de sexo na prevalência e correlatos [Extradyadic behaviors in dating relationships: Sex differences in prevalence and correlates]. Análise Psicológica, 32, 45–62. doi: 10.14417/ap.740.Google Scholar
  42. Mattingly, B. A., Wilson, K., Clark, E. M., Bequette, A. W., & Weidler, D. J. (2010). Foggy faithfulness: Relationship quality, religiosity, and the Perceptions of Dating Infidelity Scale in an adult sample. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1465–1480. doi: 10.1177/0192513X10362348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McAlister, A., Pachana, N., & Jackson, C. (2005). Predictors of young dating adults’ inclination to engage in extradyadic sexual activities: A multi-perspective study. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 331–350. doi: 10.1348/000712605X47936.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McAnulty, R., & Brineman, J. (2007). Infidelity in dating relationships. Annual Review of Sex Research, 18, 94–114. doi: 10.1080/10532528.2007.10559848.Google Scholar
  45. Merkle, E., & Richardson, R. (2000). Digital dating and virtual relating: Conceptualizing computer mediated romantic relationships. Family Relations, 49, 187–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00187.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miller, S., & Maner, J. (2009). Sex differences in response to sexual versus emotional infidelity: The moderating role of individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 287–291. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Sullivan, L. F., & Ronis, S. T. (2013). Virtual cheating hearts: Extradyadic and poaching interactions among adolescents with links to online sexual activities. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 45, 175–184. doi: 10.1037/a0031683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Randall, H. E., & Byers, E. S. (2003). What is sex? Students’ definitions of having sex, sexual partner, and unfaithful sexual behaviour. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 12, 87–96.Google Scholar
  49. Roscoe, B., Cavanaugh, L., & Kennedy, D. (1988). Dating infidelity: Behaviors, reasons and consequences. Adolescence, 23, 35–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204. doi: 10.1177/026540759301000202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shaw, J. (1997). Treatment rationale for Internet infidelity. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22, 29–34.Google Scholar
  54. Shaw, A. M., Rhoades, G. K., Allen, E. S., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2013). Predictors of extradyadic sexual involvement in unmarried opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 598–610. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.666816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thompson, A. P. (1984). Emotional and sexual components of extramarital relations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 46, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Træen, B., Holmen, K., & Stigum, H. (2007). Extradyadic sexual relationships in Norway. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 55–65. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9080-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Træen, B., & Martinussen, M. (2008). Extradyadic activity in a random sample of Norwegian couples. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 319–328. doi: 10.1080/00224490802398324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Træen, B., & Stigum, H. (1998). Parallel sexual relationships in the Norwegian context. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 8, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Treas, J., & Giesen, D. (2000). Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 48–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00048.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of Man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
  61. Turner, C. F., Ku, L., Rogers, S. M., Lindberg, L. D., Pleck, J. H., & Stonenstein, F. L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867–873. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5365.867.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Underwood, H., & Findlay, B. (2004). Internet relationships and their impact on primary relationships. Behaviour Change, 21, 127–140. doi: 10.1375/bech.21.2.127.55422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. VanderDrift, L. E., Lehmiller, J. J., & Kelly, J. R. (2012). Commitment in friends with benefits relationships: Implications for relational and safe-sex outcomes. Personal Relationships, 19, 1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01324.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Whatley, M. A. (2012). Attitudes toward Infidelity scale. In D. Knox & C. Schacht (Eds.), Choices in relationships: An introduction marriage and the family (11th ed., p. 415). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. Whisman, M. A., Gordon, K. C., & Chatav, Y. (2007). Predicting sexual infidelity in a population-based sample of married individuals. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 320–324. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Whisman, M. A., & Snyder, D. K. (2007). Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: Differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 147–154. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Whitty, MT. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men’s and women’s attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 569–579. doi: 10.1089/109493103322725342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitty, M. T. (2005). The realness of cybercheating: Men’s and women’s representations of unfaithful Internet relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 57–67. doi: 10.1177/0894439304271536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wiederman, M. W. (1997). Extramarital sex: Prevalence and correlates in a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 167–174. doi: 10.1080/00224499709551881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wiederman, M. W., & Hurd, C. (1999). Extradyadic involvement during dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 265–274. doi: 10.1177/0265407599162008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wysocki, D. K. (1998). Let your fingers do the talking: Sex on an adult chat-line. Sexualities, 1, 425–452. doi: 10.1177/136346098001004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wysocki, D. K., & Childers, C. D. (2011). “Let my fingers do the talking”: Sexting and infidelity in cyberspace. Sexuality and Culture, 15, 217–239. doi: 10.1007/s12119-011-9091-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Young, K. S., Griffin-Shelley, E., Cooper, A., O’Mara, J., & Buchanan, J. (2000). Online infidelity: A new dimension in couple relationships with implications for evaluation and treatment. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7, 59–74. doi: 10.1080/10720160008400207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Martins
    • 1
  • Marco Pereira
    • 1
  • Rita Andrade
    • 1
  • Frank M. Dattilio
    • 2
  • Isabel Narciso
    • 3
  • Maria Cristina Canavarro
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação da Universidade de CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations