Infidelity in Dating Relationships: Gender-Specific Correlates of Face-to-Face and Online Extradyadic Involvement
- 2k Downloads
This study examined the gender-specific correlates of face-to-face and online extradyadic involvement (EDI) in dating relationships. The sample consisted of 561 women (M age = 23.19 years) and 222 men (M age = 23.97 years), all of whom reported being in an exclusive dating relationship for an average of 35 months. Participants completed the following self-report measures: Extradyadic Behavior Inventory, Attitudes toward Infidelity Scale, and Investment Model Scale. During the current relationship, men were more likely than women to report engagement in face-to-face physical/sexual EDI (23.4 vs. 15.5 %) and online sexual EDI (15.3 vs. 4.6 %). Both men and women with a history of infidelity in a prior relationship were more likely to engage in EDI. More positive attitudes toward infidelity, lower relationship satisfaction, lower commitment, and higher quality of alternatives were significantly associated with EDI, regardless of gender. Women reporting infidelity of a partner in a prior relationship were more likely to engage in face-to-face and online emotional EDI; a longer relationship and a younger age at the first sexual encounter were significant correlates of the engagement in face-to-face emotional EDI. Women with higher education were approximately three times more likely to engage in online sexual EDI. Although men and women are converging in terms of overall EDI, men still report higher engagement in physical/sexual extradyadic behaviors, and the correlates of sexual and emotional EDI vary according to gender. This study contributes to a comprehensive approach of factors influencing the likelihood of EDI and encourages future research in this area.
KeywordsDating relationships Extradyadic involvement Infidelity Gender differences
This study was developed within the research line “Relationships, Development & Health” of the R&D Unit CINEICC (Cognitive-Behavioral Center for Research and Intervention), University of Coimbra (PEst-OE/PSI/UI0730/2014). Marco Pereira is supported by a post-doctoral scholarship from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (SFRH/BPD/44435/2008).
- DeGenova, M. K., & Rice, F. P. (2005). Intimate relationships, marriages, and families (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitudes structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. I, pp. 269–322). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Impett, E. A., Beals, K. P., & Peplau, L. A. (2001/2002). Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples. Current Psychology, 20, 312–326. doi: 10.1007/s12144-001-1014-3.
- Kontula, O., & Haavio-Mannila, E. (1995). Sexual pleasures: Enhancement of sex life in Finland, 1971-1992. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Lewin, B. (2000). Sexual intercourse and partners. In B. Lewin (Ed.), Sex in Sweden: On the Swedish sexual life (pp. 76–79). Stockholm: National Institute of Public Health.Google Scholar
- Martins, A., Pereira, M., & Canavarro, M. C. (2014). Comportamentos extra-diádicos nas relações de namoro: Diferenças de sexo na prevalência e correlatos [Extradyadic behaviors in dating relationships: Sex differences in prevalence and correlates]. Análise Psicológica, 32, 45–62. doi: 10.14417/ap.740.Google Scholar
- Mattingly, B. A., Wilson, K., Clark, E. M., Bequette, A. W., & Weidler, D. J. (2010). Foggy faithfulness: Relationship quality, religiosity, and the Perceptions of Dating Infidelity Scale in an adult sample. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1465–1480. doi: 10.1177/0192513X10362348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Randall, H. E., & Byers, E. S. (2003). What is sex? Students’ definitions of having sex, sexual partner, and unfaithful sexual behaviour. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 12, 87–96.Google Scholar
- Shaw, J. (1997). Treatment rationale for Internet infidelity. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22, 29–34.Google Scholar
- Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of Man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
- Whatley, M. A. (2012). Attitudes toward Infidelity scale. In D. Knox & C. Schacht (Eds.), Choices in relationships: An introduction marriage and the family (11th ed., p. 415). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar