Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 44, Issue 8, pp 2173–2187 | Cite as

Stigma-Related Stress and Its Correlates Among Men with Pedophilic Sexual Interests

  • Sara JahnkeEmail author
  • Alexander F. Schmidt
  • Max Geradt
  • Jürgen Hoyer
Original Paper

Abstract

Despite decades of research on the adverse consequences of stereotyping and discrimination for many stigmatized groups, little is known about how people with pedophilia perceive and react to stigma. In this article, we present a framework that outlines how stigma-related stress might negatively affect emotional and social areas of functioning, cognitive distortions, and the motivation to pursue therapy, all of which may contribute to an increased risk of sexual offending. We tested our hypotheses in an online survey among self-identified German-speaking people with pedophilia (N = 104) using a wide range of validated indicators of social and emotional functioning (Brief Symptom Inventory-53, UCLA Loneliness Scale, Emotion Subscale of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, Fear of Negative Evaluation-5, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale). Specific risk factors such as self-efficacy, cognitive distortions, and the motivation to seek treatment were also assessed. In line with our hypotheses, fear of discovery generally predicted reduced social and emotional functioning. Contrary to our predictions, perceived social distance and fear of discovery were not linked to self-efficacy, cognitive distortions, or treatment motivation. Results were controlled for the effects of confounding variables (e.g., age, educational level, social desirability, relationship status). We critically evaluate the empirical contribution of this study to research on stigma and child sex offenses, including a discussion of the results in light of the potential indirect effects that public stigma may have on the overall risk for sexual offenses.

Keywords

Stigma Pedophilia Paraphilia Child sexual abuse Social distance 

References

  1. Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., & Cunningham-Rathner, J. (1984). Complications, consent, and cognitions in sex between children and adults. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 89–103. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(84)90008-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adiele, T., Davidson, C. M., Harlow, M. C., & del Busto, E. (2011). Co-morbid mental disorders in incarcerated paedophiles. Sexual Offender Treatment, 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/100.html.
  3. Ahmad, S., & Bhugra, D. (2010). Homophobia: An updated review of the literature. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 447–455. doi: 10.1080/14681994.2010.515206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alanko, K., Haikio, J., Laiho, M., Jahnke, S., & Santtila, P. (2015). Attitudes and knowledge to treat potential child sexual offenders among Finnish health care professionals. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Angermeyer, M. C., & Dietrich, S. (2006). Public beliefs about and attitudes towards people with mental illness: A review of population studies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 113, 163–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00699.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Beier, K. M., Ahlers, C. J., Goecker, D., Neutze, J., Mundt, I. A., Hupp, E., & Schaefer, G. A. (2009). Can pedophiles be reached for primary prevention of child sexual abuse? First results of the Berlin Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD). Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 851–867. doi: 10.1080/14789940903174188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beier, K. M., Amelung, T., Kuhle, L., Grundmann, D., Scherner, G., & Neutze, J. (2013). Hebephilie als sexuelle Störung. Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie, 81, 128–137. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1330539.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bilsky, W., & Hosser, D. (1998). Soziale Unterstützung und Einsamkeit: Psychometrischer Vergleich zweier Skalen auf Basis einer bundesweiten Repräsentativbefragung. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 19, 130–144.Google Scholar
  11. Borchers, M. (2007). Gemeinsame und differenzierende psychologische Charakteristika von Kindesmissbrauchern mit und ohne Pädophilie. (Unpublished diploma thesis). Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden.Google Scholar
  12. Bumby, K. M. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 37–54. doi: 10.1177/107906329600800105.Google Scholar
  13. Corrigan, P. W., Watson, A. C., & Barr, L. (2006). The self-stigma of mental illness: Implications for self-esteem and self-efficacy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 875–884. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2006.25.8.875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. doi: 10.1037/h0047358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Derogatis, L. R., & Savitz, K. L. (2000). The SCL-90-R and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) in primary care. In M. Maruish (Ed.), Handbook of psychological assessment in primary care settings (pp. 297–334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Derogatis, L. R., & Spencer, M. S. (1982). The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual 1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Clinical Psychometrics Research Unit.Google Scholar
  17. Dombert, B., Schmidt, A. F., Banse, R., Briken, P., Hoyer, J., Neutze, J., & Osterheider, M. (in press). How common is males’ self-reported sexual interest in prepubescent children? Journal of Sex Research.Google Scholar
  18. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844–854. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.5.844.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Feelgood, S., Cortoni, F., & Thompson, A. (2005). Sexual coping, general coping and cognitive distortions in incarcerated rapists and child molesters. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11, 157–170. doi: 10.1080/13552600500073657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldman, D. B., & Crandall, C. S. (2007). Dimensions of mental illness stigma: What about mental illness causes social rejection? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 137–154. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.2.137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferring, D., & Filipp, S.-H. (1996). Messung des Selbstwertgefühls: Befunde zu Reliabilität, Validität und Stabilität der Rosenberg-Skala. Diagnostica, 42, 284–292.Google Scholar
  22. Finkelhor, D., & Araji, S. (1986). Explanations of pedophilia: A four factor model. Journal of Sex Research, 22, 145–161. doi: 10.1080/00224498609551297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fog, A. (1992). Paraphilias and therapy. Nordisk Sexologi, 10, 236–242.Google Scholar
  24. Franke, G. H. (2000). Brief Symptom Inventory von Derogatis (BSI). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  25. Geisheim, C., Hahlweg, K., Fiegenbaum, W., Frank, M., Schröder, B., & von Witzleben, I. (2002). Das Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) als Instrument zur Qualitätssicherung in der Psychotherapie. Diagnostica, 48, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  27. Gonsior, K. (2002). Erfassung von kognitiven Verzerrungen und Opferempathie bei Sexualstraftätern. Unpublished diploma thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, R. C. W., & Hall, R. C. W. (2007). A profile of pedophilia: Definition, characteristics of offenders, recidivism, treatment outcomes, and forensic issues. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 82, 457–471. doi: 10.4065/82.4.457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2009). How does sexual minority stigma “get under the skin”? A psychological mediation framework. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 707–730. doi: 10.1037/a0016441.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2013). Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 813–821. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301069.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoffmann, A., Schmidt, A. F., Waubert de Puiseau, B., & Musch, J. (2015). On the comprehensibility and perceived privacy protection of indirect questioning techniques. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  32. Holt, T. J., Blevins, K. R., & Burkert, N. (2010). Considering the pedophile subculture online. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 3–24. doi: 10.1177/1079063209344979.Google Scholar
  33. Hoyer, J., Kunst, H., & Schmidt, A. (2001). Social phobia as a comorbid condition in sex offenders with paraphilia or impulse control disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189, 463–470. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200107000-00008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Imhoff, R. (2015). Punitive attitudes against pedophiles or persons with sexual interest in children: Does the label matter? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 35–44. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jahnke, S., & Hoyer, J. (2013). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: A blind spot in stigma research. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25, 169–184. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2013.795921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jahnke, S., Imhoff, R., & Hoyer, J. (2015a). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: Two comparative surveys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 21–34. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0312-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Jahnke, S., Philipp, K., & Hoyer, J. (2015b). Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with pedophilia and their malleability among psychotherapists in training. Child Abuse and Neglect, 40, 93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.07.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kälin, W. (1995). Deutsche 24-Item Kurzform des “Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations” (CISS) von N. S. Endler & J. D. A. Parker. Basierend auf der Übersetzung von N. Semmer, F. Tschan, & V. Schade (unveröffentlichter Fragebogen). Institut für Psychologie, Universität Bern.Google Scholar
  39. Kays, K., Gathercoal, K., & Buhrow, W. (2012). Does survey format influence self-disclosure on sensitive question items? Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 251–256. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kemper, C. J., Lutz, J., & Neuser, J. (2012). Konstruktion und Validierung einer Kurzform der Skala Angst vor negativer Bewertung (SANB-5). Klinische Diagnostik und Evaluation, 4, 343–360.Google Scholar
  41. Lane, J. D., & Wegner, D. M. (1995). The cognitive consequences of secrecy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 237–253. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.2.237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leue, A., Borchard, B., & Hoyer, J. (2004). Mental disorders in a forensic sample of sexual offenders. European Psychiatry, 19, 123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2003.08.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Link, B. G., Struening, E. L., Rahav, M., Phelan, J. C., & Nuttbrock, L. (1997). On stigma and its consequences: Evidence from a longitudinal study of men with dual diagnoses of mental illness and substance abuse. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 177–190. doi: 10.2307/2955424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217. doi: 10.1177/1079063210366039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marshall, W. L., Serran, G. A., & Cortoni, F. A. (2000). Childhood attachments, sexual abuse, and their relationship to adult coping in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 17–26. doi: 10.1177/107906320001200103.Google Scholar
  46. McCartan, K. F. (2010). Student/trainee-professional implicit theories of paedophilia. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 265–288. doi: 10.1080/10683160802614144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Neuser, J. (2003). Skala “Angst vor negativer Bewertung” (SANB). In J. Hoyer & J. Margraf (Eds.), Grundlagen und Testverfahren: Angstdiagnostik (pp. 280–283). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Neutze, J., Grundmann, D., Scherner, G., & Beier, K. M. (2012). Undetected and detected child sexual abuse and child pornography offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35, 168–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.02.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Neutze, J., Seto, M. C., Schaefer, G. A., Mundt, I. A., & Beier, K. M. (2011). Predictors of child pornography offenses and child sexual abuse in a community sample of pedophiles and hebephiles. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 212–242. doi: 10.1177/1079063210382043.Google Scholar
  51. Okami, P., & Goldberg, A. (1992). Personality correlates of pedophilia: Are they reliable indicators? Journal of Sex Research, 29, 297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pachankis, J. E. (2007). The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: A cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 328–345. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pithers, W. D., Kashima, K. M., Cumming, G. F., Beal, L. S., & Buell, M. M. (1988). Relapse prevention of sexual aggression. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528, 244–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb50868.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Rambow, J., Elsner, K., Feelgood, S., & Hoyer, J. (2008). Einstellungen zum Kindesmissbrauch: Untersuchungen mit der Bumby Child Molest Scale bei Missbrauchs-und Gewalttätern. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 21, 341–355. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1098723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Raymond, N. C., Coleman, E., Ohlerking, F., Christenson, G. A., & Miner, M. (1999). Psychiatric comorbidity in pedophilic sex offenders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 786–788.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rusch, N., Angermeyer, M. C., & Corrigan, P. W. (2005). Mental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. European Psychiatry, 20, 529–539.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20–40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Schaefer, G. A., Mundt, I. A., Feelgood, S., Hupp, E., Neutze, J., Ahlers, C. J., … Beier, K. M. (2010). Potential and Dunkelfeld offenders: Two neglected target groups for prevention of child sexual abuse. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 154–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.03.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Schmidt, A. F., Mokros, A., & Banse, R. (2013). Is pedophilic sexual preference continuous? A taxometric analysis based on direct and indirect measures. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1146–1153. doi: 10.1037/A0033326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Seto, M. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Seto, M. C. (2012). Is pedophilia a sexual orientation? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 231–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Smart, L., & Wegner, D. M. (2000). The hidden costs of hidden stigma. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 220–242). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  65. Smolenski, D. J., Stigler, M. H., Ross, M. W., & Rosser, B. R. S. (2011). Direct and indirect associations between internalized homonegativity and high-risk sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 785–792. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9705-1.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Stiels-Glenn, M. (2010). The availability of outpatient psychotherapy for paedophiles in Germany. Recht & Psychiatrie, 28, 74–80.Google Scholar
  67. Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität. Diagnostica, 45, 173–177. doi: 10.1026//0012-1924.45.4.173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vogel, D. L., & Wade, N. G. (2009). Stigma and help-seeking. Psychologist, 22, 20–23.Google Scholar
  69. Ward, T., & Beech, A. (2006). An integrated theory of sexual offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 44–63. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2005.05.00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ward, P., Clark, T., Zabriskie, R., & Morris, T. (2012). Paper/pencil versus online data collection: An exploratory study. Journal of Leisure Research, 44, 507–530.Google Scholar
  71. Ward, T., & Keenan, T. (1999). Child molesters’ implicit theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 821–838. doi: 10.1177/088626099014008003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ward, T., & Siegert, R. J. (2002). Toward a comprehensive theory of child sexual abuse: A theory knitting perspective. Psychology, Crime & Law, 8, 319–351. doi: 10.1080/1068316021000054274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Warner, S. L. (1965). Randomized-response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 63–69. doi: 10.2307/2283137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448–457. doi: 10.1037/H0027806.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. West, D. (2000). Paedophilia: Plague or panic? Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 11, 511–531. doi: 10.1080/09585180010002669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Westefeld, J. S., Maples, M. R., Buford, B., & Taylor, S. (2001). Gay, lesbian, and bisexual college students: The relationship between sexual orientation and depression, loneliness, and suicide. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 15, 71–82. doi: 10.1300/J035v15n03_06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Whitaker, D. J., Le, B., Hanson, R. K., Baker, C. K., McMahon, P. M., Ryan, G., … Rice, D. D. (2008). Risk factors for the perpetration of child sexual abuse: A review and meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 529–548. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Williams, A., Moore, E., Adshead, G., McDowell, A., & Tapp, J. (2011). Including the excluded: High security hospital user perspectives on stigma, discrimination, and recovery. British Journal of Forensic Practice, 13, 197–204. doi: 10.1108/14636641111157841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wilson, G., & Cox, D. (1983). The child lovers: A study of paedophiles in society. London: Peter Owen Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Jahnke
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alexander F. Schmidt
    • 2
  • Max Geradt
    • 1
  • Jürgen Hoyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Klinische Psychologie und PsychotherapieTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.INSIDE Research Unit, Institute for Health and BehaviourUniversity of LuxembourgWalferdangeLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations