Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 85–97 | Cite as

Longitudinal Associations Among Relationship Satisfaction, Sexual Satisfaction, and Frequency of Sex in Early Marriage

  • James K. McNultyEmail author
  • Carolyn A. Wenner
  • Terri D. Fisher
Original Paper


The current research used two 8-wave longitudinal studies spanning the first 4–5 years of 207 marriages to examine the potential bidirectional associations among marital satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and frequency of sex. All three variables declined over time, though the rate of decline in each variable became increasingly less steep. Controlling for these changes, own marital and sexual satisfaction were bidirectionally positively associated with one another; higher levels of marital satisfaction at one wave of assessment predicted more positive changes in sexual satisfaction from that assessment to the next and higher levels of sexual satisfaction at one wave of assessment predicted more positive changes in marital satisfaction from that assessment to the next. Likewise, own sexual satisfaction and frequency of sex were bidirectionally positively associated with one another. Additionally, partner sexual satisfaction positively predicted changes in frequency of sex and own sexual satisfaction among husbands, yet partner marital satisfaction negatively predicted changes in both frequency of sex and own sexual satisfaction. Controlling these associations, marital satisfaction did not directly predict changes in frequency of sex or vice versa. Only the association between partner sexual satisfaction and changes in own sexual satisfaction varied across men and women and none of the key effects varied across the studies. These findings suggest that sexual and relationship satisfaction are intricately intertwined and thus that interventions to treat and prevent marital distress may benefit by targeting the sexual relationship and interventions to treat and prevent sexual distress in marriage may benefit by targeting the marital relationship.


Sexual satisfaction Marital satisfaction Frequency of sex Sex differences 


  1. Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.126.3.375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Box, G. E. P., & Tiao, G. C. (1973). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1991). A contextual model for advancing the study of marital interaction. In G. J. O. Fletcher & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Cognition in close relationships (pp. 127–147). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Bridges, S. K., Lease, S. H., & Ellison, C. R. (2004). Predicting sexual satisfaction in women:Implications for counselor education and training. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82, 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W., & Congdon, R. T. (2004). HLM: Hierarchical linear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  6. Bulloch, A. G., Williams, J. V., Lavorato, D. H., & Patten, S. B. (2009). The relationship between major depression and marital disruption is bidirectional. Depression and Anxiety, 26, 1172–1177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, T., Imperato-McGinley, J., Pan, H., Voyer, D., Cordero, J., Zhu, Y.-S., et al. (2006). Sex differences in mental rotation: Top-down versus bottom-up processing. NeuroImage, 32, 445–456. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Byers, E. S. (2005). Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 113–118. doi: 10.1080/00224490509552264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Call, V., Sprecher, S., & Schwartz, P. (1995). The incidence and frequency of marital sex in a national sample. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 639–652. doi: 10.2307/353919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (2007). Multiple social categorization. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 163–254). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Davidson, A. R., & Jaccard, J. J. (1979). Variables that moderate the attitude–behavior relation: Results of a longitudinal survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1364–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diamond, L. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110, 173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellis, B. J., & Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Sex Research, 27, 527–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–109). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fincham, F. D., Garnier, P. C., Gano-Phillips, S., & Osborne, L. N. (1995). Preinteraction expectations, marital satisfaction and accessibility: A new look at sentiment override. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 3–14. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.9.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher, T. D., & McNulty, J. K. (2008). Neuroticism and marital satisfaction: The mediating role played by the sexual relationship. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 112–122. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hawkins, M. W., Carrére, S., & Gottman, J. M. (2002). Marital sentiment override: Does it influence couples’ perceptions? Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 193–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00193.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heiman, J. R., Long, J. S., Smith, S. N., Fisher, W. A., Sand, M. S., & Rosen, R. C. (2011). Sexual satisfaction and relationship happiness in midlife and older couples in five countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 741–753.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henderson-King, D. H., & Veroff, J. (1994). Sexual satisfaction and marital well-being in the first years of marriages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 509–534. doi: 10.1177/0265407594114002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Higgins, E. T., & Bargh, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. In M. R. Resenweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 369–425). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
  26. Hudson, W. W. (1998). Index of sexual satisfaction. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 512–513). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Impett, E. A., Muise, A., & Peragine, D. (2014). Sexuality in the context of relationships. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology: Vol. 1. Person-based approaches (pp. 269–315). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  28. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995a). Assessing longitudinal change in marriage: An introduction to the analysis of growth curves. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 1091–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995b). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Lawrance, K., & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2, 267–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McNulty, J. K. (2008). Neuroticism and interpersonal negativity: The independent contributions of behavior and perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1439–1450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McNulty, J. K., & Fisher, T. D. (2008). Gender differences in response to sexual expectancies and changes in sexual frequency: A short-term longitudinal investigation of sexual satisfaction in newly married heterosexual couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 229–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McNulty, J. K., O’Mara, E. M., & Karney, B. R. (2008). Benevolent cognitions as a strategy of relationship maintenance: “Don’t sweat the small stuff”…but it’s not all small stuff. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 631–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McNulty, J. K., & Widman, L. (2013). The implications of sexual narcissism for sexual and marital satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1021–1032.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413–417.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peplau, L. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 37–40. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rothbart, M. (1981). Memory processes and social beliefs. In D. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 145–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2002). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment & Human Development, 4, 133–161. doi: 10.1080/14616730210154171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sprecher, S. (2002). Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 190–196. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sprecher, S., & Cate, R. M. (2004). Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 235–256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  43. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Weiss, R. L. (1980). Strategic behavioral marital therapy: Toward a model for assessment and intervention. In J. P. Vincent (Ed.), Advances in family intervention, assessment and theory (Vol. 1, pp. 229–271). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wills, T. A., Weiss, R. L., & Patterson, G. R. (1974). A behavioral analysis of the determinants of marital satisfaction. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 42, 802–811. doi: 10.1037/h0037524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition in its social context. Psychological Review, 93, 322–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yeh, H. C., Lorenz, F. O., Wickrama, K. A. S., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (2006). Relationships among sexual satisfaction, marital quality, and marital instability at midlife. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 339–343. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.2.339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • James K. McNulty
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carolyn A. Wenner
    • 2
  • Terri D. Fisher
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Cornerstone CounselingBellevueUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyOhio State University at MansfieldMansfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations