Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 1663–1674 | Cite as

Gender Differences in Liking and Wanting Sex: Examining the Role of Motivational Context and Implicit Versus Explicit Processing

Original Paper


The present study investigated the specificity of sexual appraisal processes by making a distinction between implicit and explicit appraisals and between the affective (liking) and motivational (wanting) valence of sexual stimuli. These appraisals are assumed to diverge between men and women, depending on the context in which the sexual stimulus is encountered. Using an Implicit Association Test, explicit ratings, and film clips to prime a sexual, romantic or neutral motivational context, we investigated whether liking and wanting of sexual stimuli differed at the implicit and explicit level, differed between men and women, and were differentially sensitive to context manipulations. Results showed that, at the implicit level, women wanted more sex after being primed with romantic mood whereas men showed the least wanting of sex in the romantic condition. At the explicit level, men reported greater liking and wanting of sex than women, independently of context. We also found that women’s (self-reported) sexual behavior was best predicted by the incentive salience of sexual stimuli whereas men’s sexual behavior was more closely related to the hedonic qualities of sexual stimuli. Results were discussed in relation to an emotion-motivational account of sexual functioning.


Sexual appraisal Information processing Gender differences Sexual desire 


  1. Alexander, M. G., & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 27–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bancroft, J. (1989). Sexual desire and the brain. Sexual and Marital Therapy, 3, 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basson, R. (2000). The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 51–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Basson, R. (2001). Using a different model for female sexual response to address women’s problematic low sexual desire. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 395–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical view, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berridge, K. C., & Kringelback, M. L. (2008). Affective neuroscience of pleasure: Reward in humans and animals. Psychopharmacology, 199, 457–480.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bluemke, M., & Friese, M. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Single Target IAT: Assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 977–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Both, S., Everaerd, W., & Laan, E. (2007). Desire emerges from excitement: A psychphysiological perspective on sexual motivation. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 327–339). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bush, S. I. (2001). Implicit and explicit memory of neutral, negative emotional, and sexual information. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 615–631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll, J. L., Volk, K. D., & Hyde, J. S. (1985). Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 131–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chivers, M. L., & Timmers, A. D. (2012). The effects of gender and relationship context cues in audio narratives on heterosexual women’s and men’s genital and subjective sexual response. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 185–197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Valentine, B. A. (2011). Women, men, and the bedroom: Methodological and conceptual insights that narrow, reframe, and eliminate gender differences in sexuality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 296–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, M. L., Shapiro, C. M., & Powers, A. M. (1998). Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: A functional perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1528–1558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. De Houwer, J., & De Bruycker, E. (2007). The Implicit Association Test outperforms the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 401–421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. De Houwer, J., & Moors, A. (2010). Implicit measures: Similarities and differences. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 176–193). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  16. Everaerd, W. (1988). Commentary on sex research: Sex as an emotion. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 1, 3–15.Google Scholar
  17. Everaerd, W., Both, S., & Laan, E. (2006). The experience of sexual emotions. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17, 183–199.Google Scholar
  18. Everaerd, W., Jannsen, E., & Spiering, M. (2003). Priming the sexual system: Implicit versus explicit activation. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 134–145.Google Scholar
  19. Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Liking is for doing: Effects of goal-pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 557–572.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferguson, M. J., Hassin, R., & Bargh, J. A. (2007). Implicit motivation: Past, present, and future. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 150–166). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Frijda, N. H. (1993). The place of appraisal in emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 357–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geer, J. H., & Manguno-Mire, G. M. (1996). Gender differences in cognitive processes in sexuality. Annual Review of Sex Research, 7, 90–124.Google Scholar
  23. Geer, J. H., & Robertson, G. G. (2005). Implicit attitudes in sexuality: Gender differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 671–677.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gillath, O., Mikulincer, M., Birnbaum, G. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). When sex primes love: Subliminal sexual priming motivates relationship goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1057–1069.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, J. L., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamann, S., Herman, R. A., Nolan, C. L., & Wallen, K. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 411–416.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hill, C. A., & Preston, L. K. (1996). Individual differences in the experience of sexual motivation: Theory and measurement of dispositional sexual motives. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwender, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Impett, E. A., Peplau, L. A., & Gable, S. L. (2005). Approach and avoidance sexual motives: Implications for personal and interpersonal well-being. Personal Relationships, 12, 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Janssen, E., Carpenter, D., & Graham, C. A. (2003). Selecting films for sex research: Gender differences in erotic film preference. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 243–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward and information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kimmel, M., & Plante, R. F. (2002). The gender of desire: The sexual fantasies of women and men. Advances in Gender Research, 6, 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krishnamurti, T., & Loewenstein, G. (2012). The Partner-Specific Sexual Liking and Sexual Wanting Scale: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 467–476.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Laan, E., & Janssen, E. (2007). How do men and women feel: Determinants of subjective experience of sexual arousal. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 278–290). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: What we know (so far) about the method. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 59–102). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  38. Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469–496.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Meana, M. (2010). Elucidating women’s (heterosexual) desire: Definitional challenges and content expansion. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 104–122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653–667.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Peplau, L. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Phelps, E. A., O’Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W. A., Funayama, E. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., et al. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 729–738.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Review, 18, 247–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2001). Mechanisms of action of addictive stimuli: incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction, 96, 103–114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2003). Addiction. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2008). The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: Some current issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 363, 3137–3146.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Snowden, R. J., & Gray, N. S. (2013). Implicit sexual associations in heterosexual and homosexual women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 475–485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Snowden, R. J., Wichter, J., & Gray, N. S. (2008). Implicit and explicit measurements of sexual preference in gay and heterosexual men: A comparison of priming techniques and the Implicit Association Task. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 558–565.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., Karsdorp, P., Both, S., & Brauer, M. (2006). Nonconscious processing of sexual information: A generalization to women. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 268–281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., & Laan, E. (2004). Conscious processing of sexual information: Mechanisms of appraisal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 369–380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Stephenson, K. R., Ahrold, T. K., & Meston, C. M. (2011). The association between sexual motives and sexual satisfaction: Gender differences and categorical comparisons. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 607–618.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Toates, F. (2009). An integrative theoretical framework for understanding sexual motivation, arousal and behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 168–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. van Lankveld, J., Martin, A., Hubben, D., Creutz, N., & Verboon, P. (2013). The effects of autobiographic sexual memory recall on the sexual response of sexually functional men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 973–983.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Zurbriggen, E. L., & Yost, M. R. (2004). Power, desire, and pleasure in sexual fantasies. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 288–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Experimental, Clinical, and Health PsychologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Psychological ScienceMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations