Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 233–247 | Cite as

Marital Characteristics and the Sexual Relationships of U.S. Older Adults: An Analysis of National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project Data

  • Samuel Stroope
  • Michael J. McFarland
  • Jeremy E. Uecker
Original Paper

Abstract

We tested several hypotheses regarding the relationship between marital characteristics and sexual outcomes among 1,656 married adults ages 57–85 years from the 2005–2006 National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. Results showed that individuals in their first marriage had more frequent sex than remarried individuals; marital duration had a curvilinear (U-shaped) relationship with frequency of sex; and a linear relationship between marital duration and frequency of sex varied by gender such that men had more frequent sex than women in younger marriages. We speculate that relationship permanency may drive the greater sexual activity in first marriages and sicker men in younger marriages may drive frequency of sex for women in younger marriages.

Keywords

Aging Sexual activity Duration of marriage Marital history Gender 

References

  1. Amato, P. R., & Previti, D. (2003). People’s reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 602–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aneshensel, C. S. (2012). Theory-based data analysis for the social sciences. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, J. O. (2008). An investigation of the sociological patterns of prayer frequency and content. Sociology of Religion, 69, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, J. O., & Draper, S. (2010). Diverse supernatural portfolios: Certitude, exclusivity, and the curvilinear relationship between religiosity and paranormal beliefs. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 413–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family (enlarged ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Call, V., Sprecher, S., & Schwartz, P. (1995). The incidence and frequency of marital sex in a national sample. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, L. M., Nathanson, C. A., & Kim, Y. J. (2009). Physical women, emotional men: Gender and sexual satisfaction in midlife. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 87–107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherlin, A. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 634–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornwell, E. Y., & Waite, L. J. (2009). Measuring social isolation among older adults using multiple indicators from the NSHAP study. Journals of Gerontology, 64B, i38–i46.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeLamater, J., Hyde, J., & Fong, M. C. (2008). Sexual satisfaction in the seventh decade of life. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 34, 439–454.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. DeLamater, J., & Sill, M. (2005). Sexual desire in later life. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 138–149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. England, P., & McClintock, E. A. (2009). The gendered double standard of aging in US marriage markets. Population and Development Review, 35, 797–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fahs, B., & Swank, E. (2011). Social identities as predictors of women’s sexual satisfaction and sexual activity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 903–914.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraser, J., Maticka-Tyndale, E., & Smylie, L. (2004). Sexuality of Canadian women at midlife. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 13, 171–187.Google Scholar
  17. Furstenberg, F. F., & Spanier, G. B. (1984). The risk of dissolution in remarriage: An examination of Cherlin’s hypothesis of incomplete institutionalization. Family Relations, 33, 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gatzeva, M., & Paik, A. (2010). Emotional and physical satisfaction in noncohabiting, cohabiting, and marital relationships: The importance of jealous conflict. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gove, W. R., Ortega, S. T., & Style, C. B. (1989). The maturational and role perspectives on aging and self through the adult years: An empirical evaluation. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1117–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greeley, A. M. (1991). Faithful attraction: Discovering intimacy, love, and fidelity in American marriage. New York: Tom Doherty Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Gross, J. J., Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Tsai, J., Skorpen, G. C., & Hsu, A. (1997). Emotion and aging: Experience, expression, and control. Psychology and Aging, 12, 590–599.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. James, W. H. (1981). The honeymoon effect on marital coitus. Journal of Sex Research, 17, 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karraker, A., DeLamater, J., & Schwartz, C. R. (2011). Sexual frequency decline from midlife to later life. Journals of Gerontology Series B, 66, 502–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keltner, D. (1996). Facial expressions of emotion and personality. In C. Magai & S. H. McFadden (Eds.), Handbook of emotion, adult development, and aging (pp. 385–401). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., Glasser, D. B., Kang, J., Wang, T., Levinson, B., et al. (2006). A cross-national study of subjective sexual well-being among older women and men: Findings from the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 145–161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindau, S. T., Schumm, L. P., Laumann, E. O., Levinson, W., O’Muircheartaigh, C., & Waite, L. J. (2007). A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 762–774.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, C. (2003). Does quality of marital sex decline with duration? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 55–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. MacNeil, S., & Byers, E. S. (2005). Dyadic assessment of sexual self-disclosure and sexual satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McFarland, M. J., Hayward, M. D., & Brown, D. (2013). I’ve got you under my skin: Marital biography and biological risk. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 363–380.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. McFarland, M. J., Uecker, J. E., & Regnerus, M. D. (2011). The role of religion in shaping sexual frequency and satisfaction: Evidence from married and unmarried older adults. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 297–308.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1992). Age and depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 187–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Neugarten, B. L. (1996). Social and psychological characteristics of older persons. In D. A. Neugarten (Ed.), The meanings of age (pp. 176–192). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Orbuch, T. L., House, J. S., Mero, R. P., & Webster, P. S. (1996). Marital quality over the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paik, A. (2010). “Hookups”, dating, and relationship quality: Does the type of sexual involvement matter? Social Science Research, 39, 739–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (2008). Age and the balance of emotions. Social Science and Medicine, 66, 2391–2400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Satcher, D. (2001). The Surgeon General’s call to action to promote sexual health and responsible sexual behavior. American Journal of Health Education, 32, 356–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schieman, S. (1999). Age and anger. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 273–289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Seldin, D. R., Friedman, H. S., & Martin, L. R. (2002). Sexual activity as a predictor of life-span mortality risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, D., Frankel, S., & Yarnell, J. (1997). Sex and death: Are they related? Findings from the Caerphilly Cohort Study. British Medical Journal, 315, 1641–1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sprecher, S. (2002). Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 190–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Steensland, B., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, W. B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79, 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Uecker, J. E. (2008). Religion, pledging, and the premarital sexual behavior of married young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 728–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Uecker, J. E., & Stokes, C. E. (2008). Early marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 835–846.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Umberson, D. (1987). Family status and health behaviors: Social control as a dimension of social integration. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28, 306–319.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Umberson, D. (1992). Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior. Social Science and Medicine, 34, 907–917.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. VanLaningham, J., Johnson, D. R., & Amato, P. R. (2000). Marital happiness, marital duration, and the u-shaped curve: Evidence from a five-wave panel study. Social Forces, 78, 1313–1341.Google Scholar
  49. Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, G. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  50. Waite, L. J., & Joyner, K. (2001a). Emotional and physical satisfaction in married, cohabiting and dating sexual unions: Do men and women differ? In E. O. Laumann & R. Michael (Eds.), Sex, love, and health in America: Private choices and public policies (pp. 239–269). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Waite, L. J., & Joyner, K. (2001b). Emotional satisfaction and physical pleasure in sexual unions: Time horizon, sexual behavior, and sexual exclusivity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. White, L. K., & Booth, A. (1985). The quality and stability of remarriages: The role of stepchildren. American Sociological Review, 50, 689–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu, Z., & Penning, M. J. (1997). Marital instability after midlife. Journal of Family Issues, 18, 459–478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Yeh, H. C., Lorenz, F. O., Wickrama, K. A. S., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (2006). Relationships among sexual satisfaction, marital quality, and marital instability at midlife. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 339–343.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Stroope
    • 1
  • Michael J. McFarland
    • 2
  • Jeremy E. Uecker
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Center for Demography and Population HealthFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyBaylor UniversityWacoUSA

Personalised recommendations