Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 43, Issue 7, pp 1237–1239 | Cite as

Why Can’t Pedophilic Disorder Remit?

  • Peer Briken
  • J. Paul Fedoroff
  • John W. Bradford
Commentary on DSM-5

The DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) was released in May 2013. Although there had been discussions about the pedophilia category during the development of DSM-5 (Blanchard, 2010, 2013; Blanchard et al., 2009; Fedoroff, Di Gioacchino, & Murphy, 2013; First, 2010; Green, 2010; O’Donohue, 2010), in the end, when compared to DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000), only small changes were made.

One was that “Pedophilia” was changed to “Pedophilia” or “Pedophilic Disorder” to make it consistent with the distinction between Paraphilias and Paraphilic Disorders throughout the chapter on Paraphilias in the DSM-5. The DSM-5 now defines Pedophilic Disorder as follows:

Criterion A: a paraphilia with “recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger)” and Criterion B: “the individual has acted on these sexual urges, or the sexual urges or fantasies...

Keywords

Sexual Orientation Sexual Interest Pedophilia Risk Assessment Instrument Paraphilic Disorder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 304–316. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9536-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, R. (2013). A dissenting opinion on DSM-5 pedophilic disorder [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 675–678. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0117-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., … Klassen P. E. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335–350. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9.
  6. Cantor, J. M. (2012). Is homosexuality a paraphilia? The evidence for and against. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 237–247. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9900-3.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fedoroff, J. P., Di Gioacchino, L., & Murphy, L. (2013). Problems with paraphilias in the DSM-5. Current Psychiatry Reports, 15, 363. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0363-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. First, M. B. (2010). DSM-5 proposals for paraphilias: Suggestions for reducing false positives related to use of behavioral manifestations [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1239–1244. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9657-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Green, R. (2010). Sexual preference for 14-year-olds as a mental disorder: You can’t be serious!! [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 585–586. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9602-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T. L., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project. (User Report No. 2007-05). Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ssssng-rsk-sxl-ffndrs/ssssng-rsk-sxl-ffndrs-eng.pdf.
  11. Jahnke, S., Imhoff, R., & Hoyer J. (2014). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: Two comparative surveys. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0312-4.
  12. Müller, K., Curry, S., Ranger, R., Briken, P., Bradford, J., & Fedoroff, J. P. (2014). Changes in sexual arousal as measured by penile plethysmography in men with pedophilic sexual interest. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 1221–1229. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Donohue, W. (2010). A critique of the proposed DSM-V diagnosis of pedophilia [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 587–590. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9604-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Seto, M. C. (2012). Is pedophilia a sexual orientation? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 231–236. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9882-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Spitzer, R. L. (2012). Spitzer reassesses his 2003 study of reparative therapy of homosexuality [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 757. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9966-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peer Briken
    • 1
  • J. Paul Fedoroff
    • 2
  • John W. Bradford
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Sex Research and Forensic PsychiatryUniversity Medical Centre Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Division of Forensic PsychiatryThe Royal Ottawa Hospital and University of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations