Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 43, Issue 7, pp 1237–1239 | Cite as

Why Can’t Pedophilic Disorder Remit?

  • Peer Briken
  • J. Paul Fedoroff
  • John W. Bradford
Commentary on DSM-5

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 304–316. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9536-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, R. (2013). A dissenting opinion on DSM-5 pedophilic disorder [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 675–678. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0117-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., … Klassen P. E. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335–350. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9.
  6. Cantor, J. M. (2012). Is homosexuality a paraphilia? The evidence for and against. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 237–247. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9900-3.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fedoroff, J. P., Di Gioacchino, L., & Murphy, L. (2013). Problems with paraphilias in the DSM-5. Current Psychiatry Reports, 15, 363. doi:10.1007/s11920-013-0363-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. First, M. B. (2010). DSM-5 proposals for paraphilias: Suggestions for reducing false positives related to use of behavioral manifestations [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1239–1244. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9657-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Green, R. (2010). Sexual preference for 14-year-olds as a mental disorder: You can’t be serious!! [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 585–586. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9602-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T. L., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project. (User Report No. 2007-05). Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ssssng-rsk-sxl-ffndrs/ssssng-rsk-sxl-ffndrs-eng.pdf.
  11. Jahnke, S., Imhoff, R., & Hoyer J. (2014). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: Two comparative surveys. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0312-4.
  12. Müller, K., Curry, S., Ranger, R., Briken, P., Bradford, J., & Fedoroff, J. P. (2014). Changes in sexual arousal as measured by penile plethysmography in men with pedophilic sexual interest. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 1221–1229. doi:10.1111/jsm.12488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Donohue, W. (2010). A critique of the proposed DSM-V diagnosis of pedophilia [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 587–590. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9604-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Seto, M. C. (2012). Is pedophilia a sexual orientation? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 231–236. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9882-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Spitzer, R. L. (2012). Spitzer reassesses his 2003 study of reparative therapy of homosexuality [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 757. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9966-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peer Briken
    • 1
  • J. Paul Fedoroff
    • 2
  • John W. Bradford
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Sex Research and Forensic PsychiatryUniversity Medical Centre Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Division of Forensic PsychiatryThe Royal Ottawa Hospital and University of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations