Stigmatization of People with Pedophilia: Two Comparative Surveys
- 4.8k Downloads
Despite productive research on stigma and its impact on people’s lives in the past 20 years, stigmatization of people with pedophilia has received little attention. We conducted two surveys estimating public stigma and determining predictors of social distance from this group. In both studies, pedophilia was defined as a “dominant sexual interest in children.” The survey was comprised of items measuring agreement with stereotypes, emotions, and social distance (among others). Responses were compared with identical items referring to either people who abuse alcohol (Study 1), sexual sadists or people with antisocial tendencies (Study 2). Study 1 was conducted in two German cities (N = 854) and Study 2 sampled 201 English-speaking online participants. Both studies revealed that nearly all reactions to people with pedophilia were more negative than those to the other groups, including social distance. Fourteen percent (Study 1) and 28 % (Study 2) of the participants agreed that people with pedophilia should better be dead, even if they never had committed criminal acts. The strongest predictors of social distance towards people with pedophilia were affective reactions to this group (anger and, inversely, associated, pity) and the political attitude of right-wing authoritarianism (Study 1). Results strongly indicate that people with pedophilia are a stigmatized group who risk being the target of fierce discrimination. We discuss this particular form of stigmatization with respect to social isolation of persons with pedophilia and indirect negative consequences for child abuse prevention.
KeywordsStigma Pedophilia Paraphilias Alcohol abuse Social distance
This publication was realized within the MiKADO project (Osterheider et al., 2011) funded by the German Federal Ministry of Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women, and Youth. We would like to extend a special thanks to Sylva Friedrich, Kathleen Philipp, Carolin Zettler, Konrad Rädlinger, and Wenke Kummer (all Dresden) for their help in the data collection and to Agustín Malón and Maximilian Geradt and for their continued support.
- B4U-ACT. (2011, December 30). Summer 2011 survey results. Retrieved from http://b4uact.org/science/survey/02.htm.
- Beier, K. M., Ahlers, C. J., Goecker, D., Neutze, J., Mundt, I. A., Hupp, E., et al. (2009). Can pedophiles be reached for primary prevention of child sexual abuse? First results of the Berlin Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD). Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 851–867. doi: 10.1080/14789940903174188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bogardus, E. S. (1933). A social distance scale. Sociology & Social Research, 17, 265–271.Google Scholar
- Cohen, S. (2011). Folk devils and moral panics. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Corrigan, P. W., Rowan, D., Green, A., Lundin, R., River, P., Uphoff-Wasowski, K., … Kubiak, M. A. (2002). Challenging two mental illness stigmas: Personal responsibility and dangerousness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 28, 293–309.Google Scholar
- Davidov, E., Thorner, S., Schmidt, P., Gosen, S., & Wolf, C. (2011). Level and change of group-focused enmity in Germany: Unconditional and conditional latent growth curve models with four panel waves. Advances in Statistical Analysis, 95, 481–500. doi: 10.1007/s10182-011-0174-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Brito, S. A., & Hodgins, S. (2009). Antisocial personality disorder. In M. M. R. Howard (Ed.), Personality, personality disorder and violence: An evidence based approach (Vol. 42, pp. 133–153). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
- Goode, S. (2010). Understanding and addressing adult sexual attraction to children. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Imhoff, R. (2014). Punitive attitudes against pedophiles or persons with sexual interest in children: Does the label matter? (submitted).Google Scholar
- Jenkins, P. (1998). Moral panic: Changing concepts of the child molester in modern America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Leaf, P. J., Bruce, M. L., Tischler, G. L., & Holzer, C. E. (1987). The relationship between demographic factors and attitudes toward mental health services. Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 275–284. doi: 10.1002/1520-6629(198704)15:2<275:AID-JCOP2290150216>3.0.CO;2-J.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osterheider, M., Banse, R., Briken, P., Goldbeck, L., Hoyer, J., Santtila, P., … Eisenbarth, H. (2011). Frequency, etiological models and consequences of child and adolescent sexual abuse: Aims and goals of the German multi-site MiKADO project. Sexual Offender Treatment, 6(2), 1–7.Google Scholar
- Schultz, P. D. (2008). Naming, blaming, and framing: Moral panic over child molesters and its implications for public policy. In C. Krinsky (Ed.), Moral panics over contemporary children and youth (pp. 95–110). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Silton, N. R., Flannelly, K. J., Milstein, G., & Vaaler, M. L. (2011). Stigma in America: Has anything changed? Impact of perceptions of mental illness and dangerousness on the desire for social distance: 1996 and 2006. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199, 361–366. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31821cd112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stadtland, C., Hollweg, M., Kleindienst, N., Dietl, J., Reich, U., & Nedopil, N. (2005). Risk assessment and prediction of violent and sexual recidivism in sex offenders: Long-term predictive validity of four risk assessment instruments. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 16, 92–108. doi: 10.1080/1478994042000270247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stiels-Glenn, M. (2010). The availability of outpatient psychotherapy for paedophiles in Germany. Recht & Psychiatrie, 28, 74–80.Google Scholar
- Zick, A., Wolf, C., Kupper, B., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Heitmeyer, W. (2008). The syndrome of group-focused enmity: The interrelation of prejudices tested with multiple cross-sectional and panel data. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 363–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00566.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar