Online Child Pornography Offenders are Different: A Meta-analysis of the Characteristics of Online and Offline Sex Offenders Against Children
- 4.7k Downloads
The current meta-analysis compared the characteristics of online child pornography-only offenders, typical (offline) sex offenders against children, and offenders with both child pornography and contact sex offences against children (mixed). Based on 30 unique samples (comparison ns ranging from 98 to 2,702), the meta-analysis found key differences between groups. Offenders who committed contact sex offences were more likely to have access to children than those with only child pornography offences. In contrast, offenders who used the internet to commit sexual offences had greater access to the internet than those with contact sex offenders. Differences between the groups, however, were not limited to differential opportunities. Sex offenders against children and mixed offenders were found to score higher on indicators of antisociality than online child pornography offenders (CPOs). CPOs were also more likely to have psychological barriers to sexual offending than sex offenders against children and mixed offenders (e.g., greater victim empathy). Mixed offenders were found to be the most pedophilic, even more than CPOs. The findings suggest that offenders who restricted their offending behavior to online child pornography offences were different from mixed offenders and offline sex offenders against children, and that mixed offenders were a particularly high risk group.
KeywordsSex offenders Internet Child pornography Pedophilia Paraphilias Meta-analysis
The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Public Safety Canada. Funding for this project was provided in part by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We would like to thank the following individuals for providing us with unpublished data or additional information for this meta-analysis: Till Amelung, Anne Burgess, David Delmonico, Liam Ennis, Ayten Erdogan, Erik Faust, Inge Hempel, Eric Imhof, Sandy Jung, Eva Kimonis, Paula Lopez, Hannah Merdian, Elicia Nademin, Olav Nielssen, Gerard Niveau, Yves Paradis, James Ray, Wineke Smid, and Gemma Wall.
Note. References marked with an asterisk were included in the meta-analysis.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
- *Armstrong, J. A. E. (2009). Internet child pornography: An examination of attachment and intimacy deficits. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
- Beier, K., Neutze, J., Mundt, I. A., Ahlers, C. J., Goecker, D., Konrad, A., et al. (2009). Encouraging self-identified pedophiles and hebephiles to seek professional help: First results of the Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD). Child Abuse and Neglect, 33, 545–549. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.04.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brand, M., Laier, C., Pawlikowski, M., Schachtle, U., Scholer, T., & Alstotter-Gleich, C. (2011). Watching pornographic pictures on the internet: Role of sexual arousal ratings and psychological–psychiatric symptoms for using internet sex sites excessively. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 371–377. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Briggs, P., Simon, W. T., & Simonsen, S. (2011). An exploratory study of internet-initiated sexual offences and the chat room sex offender: Has the internet enabled a new typology of sex offender? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 72–91. doi: 10.1177/1079063210384275.Google Scholar
- Carnes, P. J., Delmonico, D. L., & Griffin, E. (2007). In the shadows of the net: Breaking free of compulsive online sexual behavior (2nd ed.). Center City, MN: Hazeldean.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- *Coward, A. I., Gabriel, A. M., Schuler, A., & Prentky, R. A. (2009, March). Child internet victimization: Project development and preliminary results. Presentation at the 2009 Annual Conference of the American Psychology—Law Society, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
- Dauvergne, M., & Turner, J. (2010). Police-reported crime statistics in Canada, 2009 (Catalogue No. 85-002-X). Juristat, 30. Statistics Canada, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2010002/article/11292-eng.htm.
- Eke, A. W., & Seto, M. C. (2012). Risk assessment of online offenders for law enforcement. In K. Ribisl & E. Quayle (Eds.), Internet child pornography: Understanding and preventing on-line child abuse (pp. 148–168). Devon, UK: Willan.Google Scholar
- Elliott, I. A., & Beech, A. R. (2009). Understanding online child pornography use: Applying sexual offense theory to internet offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.03.002.
- *Elliott, I. A., Beech, A. R., & Mandeville-Norden, R. (2012). The psychological profiles of internet, contact, and mixed internet/contact sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. doi: 10.1177/1079063212439426.
- *Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Wolak, J. (2012). Second National Juvenile Online Victimization Incidence Study (NJOV-2) [Dataset]. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect website: http://www.ndacan.cornell.edu.
- *Finkelhor, D., Wolak, J., & Mitchell, K. (2008). Juvenile Online Victimization Incidence Study (N-JOV) [Dataset]. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect web site: http://www.ndacan.cornell.edu.
- Graf, M., & Dittmann, V. (2011). Forensic-psychiatric treatment for internet sex offenders. In D. P. Boer, R. Eher, L. A. Craig, M. H. Miner, & F. Pfäfflin (Eds.), International perspectives on the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 479–488). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hamilton, M. (2012). The child pornography crusade and its net widening effect. Cardoza Law Review, 33, 1679–1732.Google Scholar
- *Hanson, R. K. (2012). Updated risk assessment data for 411 online sex offenders and extrafamilial offenders identified in The Dynamic Supervision Project, 2007. Ottawa, ON: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
- Harris, A. J. R., & Hanson, R. K. (2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple question (user report 2004-03). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.Google Scholar
- *Hempel, I. S., Buck, N. M. L., Goethals, K. R., & van Marle, H. J. C. (2013). Unraveling sexual associations in contact and noncontact child sex offenders using the single category—Implicit Association Test. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 444–460. doi: 10.1177/1079063212464660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- *Jung, S., Ennis, L., Stein, S., Choy, A., & Hook, T. (2012). Child pornography possessors: Comparisons and contrasts with contact- and non-contact sex offenders. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Kuhle, L. F., Neutze, J., Amelung, D., Grundmann, G., Scherner, A., Konrad, G. A., Schaefer, K. M., & Beier, K. M. (2012, September). Treatment-change in child pornography offending in pedophiles and hebephiles in the Prevention Project Dunkelfeld. Paper presented at the conference of the International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
- *Lopez, P. (2008). Descriptive and psychological data from 133 sex offenders identified in An in-depth look at northern Nevada’s sex offenders. Master’s thesis. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI: 1455648). Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
- *Magaletta, P. R., Faust, E., Bickart, W., & McLearen, A. M. (2014). Exploring clinical and personality characteristics of adult male internet-only child pornography offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 137–153. doi: 10.1177/0306624X12465271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- *Matsuzawa, Y. K. (2009). MMPI-2 characteristics of internet sex offenders. Doctoral dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI: 3365796).Google Scholar
- *McCarthy, J. (2010a). The relationship between possessing child pornography and child molestation. Doctoral thesis. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI: 3412742).Google Scholar
- *McWhaw, A. (2011). Online child pornography offenders and risk assessment: How online offenders compare to contact offenders using common risk assessment variables. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
- *Merdian, H. L. (2012). Offenders who use child sexual exploitation material: Development of an integrated model for classification, assessment, and treatment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Waikato, New Zealand.Google Scholar
- Neutze, J., Grundmann, D., Amelung, T., Kuhle, L. F., Scherner, G., Konrad, A., et al. (2012a, September). Treatment change in dynamic risk factors in the Prevention Project Dunkelfeld. Paper presented at the International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders Conference, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
- *Neutze, J., Seto, M. C., Schaefer, G. A., Mundt, I. A., & Beier, K. M. (2011). Predictors of child pornography offenses and child sexual abuse in a community sample of pedophiles and hebephiles. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 212–242. doi: 10.1177/1079063210382043.
- *Paradis, Y., & Titley, S. (2011, September). Psychological data from 38 sex offenders identified in Portrait clinique sommaire d’individus condamnés pour des accusations de pornographie juvénile et évalués au Centre d’Intervention en Délinquance Sexuelle de Laval (CIDS). Paper presented at the meeting of Congrès International Francophone sur l’Agression Sexuelle, Montreaux, Suisse. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
- *Perrot, M., Benony, H., & Lopes, G. (2001, September). Les téléchargeurs d’images pédopornographiques: Un groupe clinique à part? Poster presented at the meeting of Congrès International Francophone sur l’Agression Sexuelle, Montreaux, Suisse.Google Scholar
- Quinsey, V. L. (1986). Men who have sex with children. In D. N. Weisstub (Ed.), Law and mental health: International perspectives (pp. 140–172). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- *Roche, B., O’Reilly, A., Gavin, A., Ruiz, M. R., & Arancibia, G. (2012). Using behavior-analytic implicit tests to assess sexual interests among normal and sex-offender populations. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 2. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from http://www.socioaffectiveneuroscipsychol.net/index.php/snp/article/view/17335.
- *Rooney, F. (2003). The internet and child sexual abuse: Personality and indicators of abusive behaviour. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
- Sexual Recovery Institute. (2013). Cybersex Addiction Screening Test. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from Sexual Recovery: http://www.sexualrecovery.com/resources/self-tests/csat.php.
- *Sheldon, K., & Howitt, D. (2007). Sex offenders and the internet. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
- *Smid, W., Schepers, K., Kamphuis, J. H., van Linden, S., & Barteling, S. (2013). Prioritizing child pornography notification: Predicting dual offending. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- *Wall, G. K., Pearce, E., & McGuire, J. (2011). Psychological data for 50 child sex offenders from North West England Probation Services identified in: Are internet offenders emotionally avoidant? Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 381–401. [Unpublished raw data].Google Scholar
- Williams, K. M., Cooper, B. S., Howell, T. M., Yuille, J. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Inferring sexually deviant behavior from corresponding fantasies: The role of personality and pornography consumption. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 36, 198–222. doi: 10.1177/0093854808327277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wolak, J. (2011, November). Child pornography possessors: Trends in offender and case characteristics. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
- Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., & Mitchell, K. J. (2005). Child Pornography Possessors Arrested in Internet-Related Crimes: Findings from the National Juvenile Online Victimization Study. Alexandria: VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. Retrieved February 4, 2014 from http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/jvq/CV81.pdf.
- Zickuhr, K., & Smith, A. (2012). Digital differences. Retrieved from Pew Research Centre’s Internet & American Life Project website: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Digital-differences.aspx.