Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 945–959 | Cite as

Does Casual Sex Harm College Students’ Well-Being? A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role of Motivation

Original Paper

Abstract

Engagement in casual sex (or hooking up) is generally feared to have negative well-being consequences; however, empirical evidence is inconclusive, pointing toward potential moderators. Using self-determination theory (SDT), we hypothesized that well-being following hookups would depend on the type and level of motivation for hooking up. A university-wide sample of 528 undergraduates completed online surveys at the beginning (T1) and end (T3) of one academic year. After controlling for demographics, personality traits (i.e., neuroticism and extraversion), prior casual and romantic sex, and T1 well-being, having genital hookups between T1 and T3 for non-autonomous reasons (i.e., due to self-imposed pressures, external contingencies and controls, or complete lack of intentionality) was linked to lower self-esteem, higher depression and anxiety, and more physical symptoms. Autonomous hookup motivation (i.e., emanating from one’s self) was not linked to any outcomes. Compared to peers without hookups, those with high non-autonomy in their hookups typically had inferior well-being; this was not true of those with low non-autonomy hookups. Gender differences, implications for SDT and casual sex research, and implications for educational programs and clinical work are discussed.

Keywords

Autonomous motivation Casual sex Hooking up Psychological well-being Self-determination theory 

References

  1. Allison, R., & Risman, B. J. (2013). A double standard for “hooking up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research, 42, 1191–1206. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Apostolopoulos, Y., Sönmez, S., & Yu, C. H. (2002). HIV-risk behaviours of American spring break vacationers: A case of situational disinhibition? International Journal of STD and AIDS, 13, 733–743. doi:10.1258/095646202320753673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435–462. doi:10.1177/0003122412445802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 537–545. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bancroft, J., Janssen, E., Carnes, L., Goodrich, D., & Strong, D. (2004). Sexual activity and risk taking in young heterosexual men: The relevance of sexual arousability, mood and sensation seeking. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 181–192. doi:10.1080/00224490409552226.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6, 166–203. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.6.2.166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bersamin, M. M., Zamboanga, B. L., Schwartz, S. J., Donnellan, M. B., Hudson, M., Weisskirch, R. S., … Caraway, S. J. (2013). Risky business: Is there an association between casual sex and mental health among emerging adults? Journal of Sex Research. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.772088.
  10. Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brunell, A. B., & Webster, G. D. (2013). Self-determination and sexual experience in dating relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi:10.1177/0146167213485442.
  12. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.100.2.204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, A. (2008). The morning after and the night before. Human Nature, 19, 157–173. doi:10.1007/s12110-008-9036-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Coleman, P. K., Rue, V. M., Spence, M., & Coyle, C. T. (2008). Abortion and the sexual lives of men and women: Is casual sexual behavior more appealing and more common after abortion? International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 8, 77–91.Google Scholar
  15. Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2002). A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or Internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821–836. doi:10.1177/00131640021970934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper, M. L. (2002). Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: Evaluating the evidence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol (Suppl. 14), 101–117.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, M. L., Shapiro, C. M., & Powers, A. M. (1998). Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: A functional perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1528–1558. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1528.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.668.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26. doi:10.1080/00224490309552163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. de Graaf, H., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2004). Gender differences in affective responses to sexual rejection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 395–403. doi:10.1023/B:ASEB.0000028892.63150.be.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The General Causality Orientations Scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Derogatis, L. R. (1993). BSI: Administration, scoring and procedures manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
  24. Donelan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192–203. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eisenberg, M. E., Ackard, D. M., Resnick, M. D., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2009). Casual sex and psychological health among young adults: Is having ‘friends with benefits’ emotionally damaging? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41, 231–237. doi:10.1363/4123109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Emmons, R. A. (1991). Personal strivings, daily life events, and psychological and physical well-being. Journal of Personality, 59, 453–472. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00256.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Eshbaugh, E. M., & Gute, G. (2008). Hookups and sexual regret among college women. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 77–89. doi:10.3200/SOCP.148.1.77-90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010a). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010b). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 36, 346–359. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2010.488118.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fielder, R. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2013). Are hookups replacing romantic relationships? A longitudinal study of first-year female college students. Journal of Adolescent Health. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.001.
  31. Fiesta Frog. (2013). Top party schools and universities 20122013 school year. Retrieved from http://www.fiestafrog.com/blog/top-party-schools-universities-2012-party-schools-nightlife/.
  32. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0000337X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Garcia, J. R., & Reiber, C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2, 192–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gentzler, A. L., & Kerns, K. A. (2004). Associations between insecure attachment and sexual experiences. Personal Relationships, 11, 249–265. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00081.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gilmartin, S. K. (2006). Changes in college women’s attitudes toward sexual intimacy. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 429–454. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00501.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. Research report of the Institute for American Values. Retrieved April 15, 2007 from http://www.americanvalues.org/Hooking_Up.pdf.
  39. Greiling, H., & Buss, D. (2000). Women’s sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00151-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S., & Dickson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent and Family Health, 3, 103–111.Google Scholar
  42. Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49, 233–240. doi:10.1037/a0012758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gute, G., & Eshbaugh, E. M. (2008). Personality as a predictor of hooking up among college students. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 25, 26–43. doi:10.1080/07370010701836385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The affective shift hypothesis: The functions of emotional changes following sexual intercourse. Personal Relationships, 8, 357–369. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00045.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hill, C. A., & Preston, L. K. (1996). Individual differences in the experience of sexual motivation: Theory and measurement of dispositional sexual motives. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 27–45. doi:10.1080/00224499609551812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2012). Talk about “hooking up”: The influence of college student social networks on non-relationship sex. Health Communication, 27, 205–216. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.575540.Google Scholar
  47. Jenkins, S. S. (2004). Gender and self-determination in sexual motivation. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 64(12-B), 6330.Google Scholar
  48. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Richardson, J. (2011). Positioning the booty-call relationship on the spectrum of relationships: Sexual but more emotional than one-night stands. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 460–470. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.497984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kenney, S. R., Thadani, V., Ghaidarov, T., & LaBrie, J. W. (2013). First-year college women’s motivations for hooking up: A mixed methods examination of normative peer perceptions and personal hookup participation. International Journal of Sexual Health. doi:10.1080/19317611.2013.786010.
  50. Kraaykamp, G. (2002). Trends and countertrends in sexual permissiveness: Three decades of attitude change in the Netherlands 1965–1995. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 225–239. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00225.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 143–164. doi:10.1177/019027250907200205.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. La Guardia, J. G., & Patrick, H. (2008). Self-determination theory as a fundamental theory of close relationships. Canadian Psychology, 49, 201–209. doi:10.1037/a0012760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129–133. doi:10.1080/00224490309552174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Levin, R. J. (2007). Sexual activity, health and well-being: The beneficial roles of coitus and masturbation. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22, 135–148. doi:10.1080/14681990601149197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lewis, M. A., Granato, H., Blayney, J. A., Lostutter, T. W., & Kilmer, J. R. (2012). Predictors of hooking up sexual behavior and emotional reactions among U.S. college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1219–1229. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9817-2.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2006). Hooking up: The relationship contexts of ‘non-relationship’ sex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 459–483. doi:10.1177/0743558406291692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2005). Adolescents’ involvement in non-romantic sexual activity. Social Science Research, 34, 384–407. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Marks, M. J. (2008). Evaluations of sexually active men and women under divided attention: A social cognitive approach to the sexual double standard. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 84–91. doi:10.1080/01973530701866664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175–186. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2006). Confirmation bias and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 54, 19–26. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-8866-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McIlhaney, J. S., & Bush, F. M. (2008). Hooked: New science on how casual sex is affecting our children. Chicago, IL: Northfield Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Meier, A. M. (2007). Adolescent first sex and subsequent mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1811–1847. doi:10.1086/512708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mendle, J., Ferrero, J., Moore, S. R., & Harden, K. P. (2013). Depression and adolescent sexual activity in romantic and nonromantic relational contexts: A genetically-informative sibling comparison. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 51–63. doi:10.1037/a0029816.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Meston, C. M., & Buss, M. P. (2007). Why humans have sex? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 477–507. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Monahan, K. C., & Lee, J. M. (2008). Adolescent sexual activity: Links between relational context and depressive symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 917–927. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9256-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Olmstead, S. B., Pasley, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). Hooking up and penetrative hookups: Correlates that differentiate college men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 573–583. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9907-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 321–330. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331–341. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Owen, J., Quirk, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). Toward a more complete understanding of reactions to hooking up among college women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2012.751074.
  71. Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Paul, E. L. (2006). Beer goggles, catching feelings, and the walk of shame: The myths and realities of the hookup experience. In D. C. Kirkpatrick, S. Duck, & M. K. Foley (Eds.), Relating difficulty: The process of constructing and managing difficult relationships (pp. 141–160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  73. Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual’ sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661. doi:10.1177/0265407502195006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experience. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Paul, E. L., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. (2009). Hookups: A facilitator or a barrier to relationship initiation and intimacy development? In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 375–390). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  76. Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0017504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). What is sex and why does it matter? A motivational approach to exploring individuals; definitions of sex. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 256–268. doi:10.1080/00224490701443932.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Randolph, K. K. (2013). The list is out: Top 10 party schools of 2013. Retrieved from http://college.monster.com/news/articles/2174-the-list-is-out-top-10-party-schools-of-2013?page=10.
  79. Regan, P. C., & Dreyer, C. S. (1999). Lust? Love? Status? Young adults’ motives for engaging in casual sex. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 11, 1–24. doi:10.1300/J056v11n01_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Reiber, C., & Garcia, J. R. (2010). Hooking up: Gender differences, evolution, and pluralistic ignorance. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 390–404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Romero-Daza, N., & Freidus, A. (2008). Female tourists, casual sex, and HIV risk in Costa Rica. Qualitative Sociology, 31, 169–187. doi:10.1007/s11133-008-9096-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology, 49, 186–193. doi:10.1037/a0012753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & LaGuardia, J. G. (2006). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 1: Theory and methods (2nd ed., pp. 795–849). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  86. Sakaguchi, K., Sakai, Y., Ueda, K., & Hasegawa, T. (2007). Robust association between sociosexuality and self-monitoring in heterosexual and non-heterosexual Japanese. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 815–825. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Is short-term mating the maladaptive result of insecure attachment? A test of competing evolutionary perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 747–768. doi:10.1177/0146167204271843.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2001a). Are men really more ‘oriented’ toward short-term mating than women? Psychology, Evolution and Gender, 3, 211–239. doi:10.1080/14616660110119331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntley, J., Tooke, W., & Buss, D. M. (2001b). The desire for sexual variety as a key to understanding basic human mating strategies. Personal Relationships, 8, 425–455. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00049.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Shulman, S., Walsh, S. D., Weisman, O., & Schelyer, M. (2009). Romantic contexts, sexual behavior, and depressive symptoms among adolescent males and females. Sex Roles, 61, 850–863. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9691-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Stepp, L. S. (2007). Unhooked: How young women pursue sex, delay love, and lose at both. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  92. Teixeira, P. J., Carraҫa, E. V., Markland, D., Silva, M. N., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 78–108. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-78.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 1009–1037. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01009.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Townsend, J. M. (1995). Sex without emotional involvement: An evolutionary interpretation of sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24, 173–206. doi:10.1007/BF01541580.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. H. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1173–1181. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9841-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Vrangalova, Z., Bukberg, R., & Gerulf, R. (2013). Birds of a feather? Not when it comes to sexual permissiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. doi:10.1177/0265407513487638.
  97. Weaver, S. J., & Herold, E. S. (2000). Casual sex and women: Measurement and motivational issues. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 12, 23–41. doi:10.1300/J056v12n03_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 98, 222–244. doi:10.1037/a0016984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wentland, J. J., & Reissing, E. D. (2011). Taking casual sex not too casually: Exploring definitions of casual sexual relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20, 75–91.Google Scholar
  100. Whipple, B., Knowles, J., & Davis, J. (2003). The health benefits of sexual expression [White Paper]. New York: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., and the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality. [Updated 2007 by Gianotten, W. L., & Golub, D.]Google Scholar
  101. Young, L., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of human mating. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1048–1054. doi:10.1038/nn1327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Muller, D., & Judd, C. M. (2004). Adjusting researchers’ approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 424–431. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human DevelopmentCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations