Adult Baby/Diaper Lovers: An Exploratory Study of an Online Community Sample
- 1.4k Downloads
This internet-based study provided descriptive information and exploratory analyses on 1,795 male and 139 female members of the Adult Baby/Diaper Lover (ABDL) community. Based on prior research, some research questions focused on the degree to which ABDL behavior was associated with negative mood states, parental relationships, and attachment style. Based on clinical experience, a second research question focused on discerning two possible subgroups within the ABDL community: persons focused on role play behavior and persons who were primarily interested in sexual arousal in their ABDL behavior. The results showed modest support for the former research questions, but notable support for the last research question. Because of some overlap between the two hypothesized subgroups, additional subgroups may exist. Males in the ABDL community identified their ABDL interests earlier than females and these males may be more focused on sexual aspects of ABDL practices. Both males and females perceived being dominated as important in their ABDL behavior. Most participants were comfortable with their ABDL behavior and reported few problems. ABDL behavior may represent a sexual subculture that is not problematic for most of its participants.
KeywordsAdult Baby Diaper Lover Paraphilia Infantilism ABDL Fetishism
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Croarkin, P., Nam, T., & Waldrep, D. (2004). Comment on adult baby syndrome [Letter to the Editor]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 2141.Google Scholar
- Darcangelo, S. (2008). Fetishism: Psychopathology and theory. In D. R. Laws & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 108–118). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Freud, S. (1961). Fetishism. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 152–157). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1927).Google Scholar
- Gates, G. J. (2006). Same-sex couples and the gay, lesbian, bisexual population: New estimates from the American Community Survey. Retrieved from The Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation Law and Public Policy, UCLA School of Law website: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8h08t0zf.
- Laws, D. R., & Donohue, W. T. (Eds.). (2008). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Lehne, G. K., & Money, J. (2003). Multiplex versus multiple taxonomy of paraphilia: Case example. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 61–72.Google Scholar
- Money, J. (1986). Lovemaps: Clinical concepts of sexual/erotic health and pathology, paraphilia, and gender transposition in childhood, adolescence, and maturity. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
- Moser, C. (2005). DSM-IV-TR and the paraphilias: An argument for removal. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 17(3/4), 91–109.Google Scholar
- Rachman, S. S., & Hodgson, R. J. (1968). Experimentally-induced ‘sexual fetishism’: Replication and development. Psychological Record, 18, 25–27.Google Scholar
- Richters, J., de Visser, R. O., Rissel, C. E., Grulich, A. E., & Smith, A. M. A. (2008). Demographic and psychosocial features of participants in bondage and discipline, “sadomasochism” or dominance and submission (BDSM): Data from a national survey. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 1660–1668.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanders, G. (1997). Recovering from paraphilia: An adolescent’s journey form despair to hope. Journal of Child and Youth Care, 11, 43–54.Google Scholar