Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Moderators of the Relationship Between Masculinity and Sexual Prejudice in Men: Friendship, Gender Self-Esteem, Same-Sex Attraction, and Religious Fundamentalism

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Masculinity has been found to predict the sexual prejudice of heterosexual men against gay men. The present study investigated the role of four variables as moderators of the relationships between two masculinity constructs (endorsement of traditional masculinity ideology and gender role conflict) and sexual prejudice in men. The hypothesized moderators were: direct and indirect friendships with gay men, gender self-esteem, acknowledged same-sex attraction, and religious fundamentalism. A total of 383 men completed 8 scales plus a demographic questionnaire. Direct friendship strengthened the positive relationship between masculinity ideology and sexual prejudice, contrary to hypothesis. This finding could mean that high masculinity ideology scores reduced the likelihood that a man with many gay friends would let go of his prejudice. Direct friendship did not moderate the relationship between gender role conflict and sexual prejudice nor did indirect friendship moderate either relationship; however, both forms of friendship predicted prejudice, as hypothesized. Gender self-esteem strengthened the positive relationships between both masculinity variables and sexual prejudice as hypothesized. Same-sex attraction weakened the relationship between gender role conflict and sexual prejudice as hypothesized, but contrary to hypothesis did not moderate the relationship between masculinity ideology and sexual prejudice. Religious fundamentalism predicted prejudice, but showed no significant moderation. The results were discussed in terms of limitations and suggestions for future research and application. In conclusion, this line of investigation appears promising and should be continued and the present findings can be utilized in anti-prejudice social marketing campaigns and in counseling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguinis, H. (2004). Regression analysis for categorical moderators. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2004). A revised religious fundamentalism scale: The short and sweet of it. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14, 47–54. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr1401_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, J. M., Struckman-Johnson, C., Quevillon, R., & Banka, S. R. (2008). Heterosexual men’s attitudes toward gay men: A hierarchical model including masculinity openness, and theoretical explanations. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 9, 154–166. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.9.3.154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catholic Answers. (2004). Homosexuality. Retrieved from http://www.catholic.com/tracts/homosexuality.

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. doi:10.1037/h0047358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L., Robb, B., & Burke, D. (2005). Sexual orientation in United States and Canadian college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 569–581. doi:10.1007/s10508-005-6283-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., Martínez, C., & Paterna, C. (2010). Gender-role’s attitude, perceived similarity, and sexual prejudice against gay men. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 841–848. doi:10.1017/S1138741600002493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., & Mugny, G. (2009). “I’m not gay…I’m a real man!”: Heterosexual men’s gender self-esteem and sexual prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1233–1243. doi:10.1177/0146167209338072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, P. A., Barron, K. E., & Tix, A. P. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, G. E, O’Neil, J. M., Stevens, M., Robertson, J. M., Fitzgerald, L. F., DeBord, K. A., … Braverman, D. G. (1995). Male gender role conflict: Psychometric issues and relations to psychological distress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, J. H., & Good, G. E. (2010). Positive psychology: An empirical examination of beneficial aspects of endorsement of masculine norms. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 11, 303–318. doi:10.1037/a0019056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. (1995). Roles, identities, and sexual orientation: Homosexuality, heterosexuality, and bisexuality. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 252–279). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, J., & Horn, S. (2009). Intergroup contact and beliefs about homosexuality in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 937–951. doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9408-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1998). Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, S. George, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 392–394). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (2000). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19–22. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). “Some of my best friends”: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes towards gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412–424. doi:10.1177/0146167296224007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1999). Sex differences in how heterosexuals think about lesbians and gay men: Evidence from survey context effects. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 348–360. doi:10.1080/00224499909552007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsberger, B., & Jackson, L. M. (2005). Religion, meaning, and prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 807–826. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00433.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keillor, S. W. (2010). Masculine norms as correlates of heterosexual men’s attitudes toward gay men and lesbian women. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 11, 38–52. doi:10.1037/a0017540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiselica, M. S., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2010). Identifying, affirming, and building upon male Strengths: the positive psychology/positive masculinity model of psychotherapy with boys and men. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47, 276–287. doi:10.1037/a0021159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M. E., & Whitely, B. E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336–353. doi:10.1177/0146167296224002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F. (1996). The new psychology of men. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 259–265. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.27.3.259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F. (2011). Research in the psychology of men and masculinity using the gender role strain paradigm as a framework. American Psychologist, 66, 762–776. doi:10.1037/a0025034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F., Rankin, T. J., Williams, C. M., Hasan, N. T., & Smalley, K. B. (2010). Evaluation of the factor structure and content validity of scores on the Male Role Norms Inventory-Revised (MRNI-R). Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 11, 25–37. doi:10.1037/a0017637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P. J., Gottfried, M., & Freitas, G. (2003). Devolopment of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 3–25. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3.

  • NIMH. (2003). Real men, real depression. Rockville, MD: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, J. M. (2008). Summarizing 25 years of research on men’s gender role conflict using the gender role conflict scale. Counseling Psychologist, 36, 358–445. doi:10.1177/0011000008317057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, J. M., Helms, B. J., Gable, R. K., David, L., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1986). Gender-role conflict scale: College men’s fear of femininity. Sex Roles, 14, 335–350. doi:10.1007/BF00287583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., & Cairns, E. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup friendship effects: Testing the moderating role of the affective-cognitive bases of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1406–1420. doi:10.1177/0146167207304788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Promise Keepers. (2011). FAQs—Controversial issues. Retrieved from http://www.promisekeepers.org/about/faqs/faqs-controversy#homo.

  • Smith, E. R., & Henry, S. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 342–635. doi:10.1177/0146167296226008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talley, A. E., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2008). Evaluations and aggression directed at a gay male target: The role of threat and antigay prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 647–683. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00321.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M., & Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325–1339. doi:10.1037/a0012453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vonofakou, C., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2007). Contact with outgroup friends as a predictor of meta-attitudinal strength and accessibility of attitudes toward gay men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 804–820. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vrangolava, Z., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2010). Correlates of same-sex sexuality in heterosexually identified young adults. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 92–102. doi:10.1080/00224490902954307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A. Z., & Cook, S. W. (2011). The complex associations between conforming to masculine norms and religiousness in men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 12, 42–54. doi:10.1037/a0020003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, B. E. (2001). Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles, 45, 691–721. doi:10.1023/A:1015640318045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as a Senior Honors Thesis at The University of Akron by the first author under the supervision of the second author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Akron, Akron, OH, 44325-4301, USA

    Christopher Mellinger & Ronald F. Levant

Authors
  1. Christopher Mellinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald F. Levant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Mellinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mellinger, C., Levant, R.F. Moderators of the Relationship Between Masculinity and Sexual Prejudice in Men: Friendship, Gender Self-Esteem, Same-Sex Attraction, and Religious Fundamentalism. Arch Sex Behav 43, 519–530 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0220-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0220-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation