Skip to main content

The Faking Orgasm Scale for Women: Psychometric Properties

Abstract

The Faking Orgasm Scale for Women (FOS) was designed to assess women’s self-reported motives for faking orgasm during oral sex and sexual intercourse. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on the responses of 481 heterosexual undergraduate females (M age = 20.33 years, SD = 2.48). Results of the EFA revealed that the FOS–Sexual Intercourse Subscale was composed of four factors: (1) Altruistic Deceit, faking orgasm out of concern for a partner’s feelings; (2) Fear and Insecurity, faking orgasm to avoid negative emotions associated with the sexual experience; (3) Elevated Arousal, a woman’s attempt to increase her own arousal through faking orgasm; and (4) Sexual Adjournment, faking orgasm to end sex. The analysis of the FOS–Oral Sex Subscale yielded four factors: (1) Altruistic Deceit; (2) Insecure Avoidance, faking orgasm to avoid feelings of insecurity; (3) Elevated Arousal; and (4) Fear of Dysfunction, faking orgasm to cope with concerns of being abnormal. Each factor of the two subscales was found to have excellent internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis on a separate sample of 398 heterosexual female undergraduates (M age = 20.52 years, SD = 2.55) confirmed the factor structure of each subscale with excellent fit statistics. The FOS should allow researchers and clinicians to better understand why women fake orgasm. Deepening this understanding may serve future research examining sexual desire, satisfaction, and dysfunction as well as have applications in sex and couples’ therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. Entire pool of items available from the corresponding author upon request.

  2. Entire pool of items available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  • Allen, D. G., Hayton, J. C., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205. doi:10.1177/1094428104263675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 46, 887–909. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-28039-4_11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, J., Loftus, J., & Long, J. S. (2003). Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 193–208. doi:10.1023/A:1023420431760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basson, R. (2000). The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 51–65. doi:10.1080/009262300278641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basson, R. (2001). Using a difference model for female sexual response to address women’s problematic low sexual desire. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 395–403. doi:10.1080/713846827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basson, R. (2006). Sexual desire and arousal disorders in women. New England Journal of Medicine, 354, 1497–1506. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp050154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (2008). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G., & Hendrie, C. A. (2011). Evidence to suggest that copulatory vocalizations are not a reflexive consequence of orgasm. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 559–564. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9632-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology & Sociobiology, 9, 291–317. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(88)90010-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A., & Lee, H. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, E. B., Conner, B. T., & Fauber, R. L. (2010, November). Motivations for faking orgasm as predictors of sexual functioning and satisfaction. Paper session presented at the LGBT Special Interest Group sponsored symposium at the meeting of the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, San Diego, CA.

  • Cooper, E. B., & Fenigstein, A. (2004). Orgasms re-examined: Motivations behind why women fake orgasms. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Cooper, E. B., Morrison, A. S., & Heimberg, R. G. (2012, November). The effects of depression and social anxiety on the decision to fake orgasm among different ethnic groups. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, National Harbor, MD.

  • Costa, R. M., & Brody, S. (2007). Women’s relationship quality is associated with specifically penile–vaginal intercourse orgasm and frequency. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 33, 319–327. doi:10.1080/00926230701385548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darling, C., & Davidson, J. (1986). Enhancing relationships: Understanding the feminine mystique of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 12, 182–196. doi:10.1080/00926238608415405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dove, N., & Wiederman, M. (2000). Cognitive distraction and women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 67–78. doi:10.1080/009262300278650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahs, B. (2010). Radical refusals: On the anarchist politics of women choosing asexuality. Sexualities, 13, 445–461. doi:10.1177/1363460710370650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. F., & West, S. G. (1997). The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 439–485. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, J. F., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for female orgasmic disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 256–270. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9542-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C., Bancroft, J., Doll, H., Greco, T., & Tanner, A. (2007). Does oral contraceptive-induced reduction in free testosterone adversely affect the sexuality or mood of women? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32, 246–255. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.12.0011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation to sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haavio-Mannila, E., & Kontula, O. (1997). Correlates of increased sexual satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 399–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J. R. (2007). Orgasmic disorders in women. In S. R. Leiblum (Ed.), Principles and practices of sex therapy (pp. 84–123). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, S. (1976). The Hite report: A nationwide study on female sexuality. Oxford, UK: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., & Scott, S. (2002). Embodying orgasm. Women and Therapy, 24, 99–110. doi:10.1300/J015v24n01_13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagose, A. (2010). Counterfeit pleasures: Fake orgasm and queer agency. Textual Practice, 24, 517–539. doi:10.1080/09502361003690849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaighobadi, F., Shackelford, T. K., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2012). Do women pretend orgasm to retain a mate? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1121–1125. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9874-6.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, R., Belsky, J., Mah, K., & Binik, Y. (2011). Are there different types of female orgasm? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 865–875. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9639-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komisaruk, B. R., Beyer-Flores, C., & Whipple, B. (2006). The science of orgasm. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999). Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 537–544. doi:10.1001/jama.300.4.395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mah, K., & Binik, Y. (2001). The nature of human orgasm: A critical review of major trends. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 823–856. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00069-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mah, K., & Binik, Y. (2005). Are orgasms in the mind or the body? Psychosocial versus physiological correlates of orgasmic pleasure and satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 31, 187–200. doi:10.1080/00926230590513401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. Oxford: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, M., & Lawrence St, J. S. (1999). Adolescents’ recall of sexual behavior: Consistency of self-report and effect of variations in recall duration. Journal of Adolescent Health, 25, 199–206. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00156-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKibbin, W. F., Bates, V. M., Shackelford, T. K., Hafen, C. A., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2010). Risk of sperm competition moderates the relationship between men’s satisfaction with their partner and men’s interest in their partner’s copulatory orgasm. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 961–966. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C. M., Hull, E., Levin, R. J., & Sipski, M. (2004). Disorders of orgasm in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 1, 66–68. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.10110.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & Shippee, S. K. (2010). Men’s and women’s reports of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 552–567. doi:10.1080/00224490903171794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nusbaum, M. R., Helton, M. R., & Ray, N. (2004). The changing nature of women’s health concerns through the midlife years. Maturitas, 49, 283–291. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.06.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, A. (2000). Coming, coming, gone: A feminist deconstruction of heterosexual orgasm. Sexualities, 3, 55–76. doi:10.1177/136346000003001003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S., Waller, N., & Comrey, A. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12, 287–297. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.3.287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. J. (1917). Woman: Her sex and love life. New York: Eugenics Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, A., & Palep-Singh, M. (2008). Taking a sexual history. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 18, 49–50. doi:10.1016/j.ogrm.2007.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. (1984). Human sperm competition. In R. L. Smith (Ed.), Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems (pp. 601–659). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., & Comer, R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1601–1615. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-28039-4_15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiefer, L. (1991). Historical, scientific, clinical, and feminist criticisms of “The human sexual response cycle”. Annual Review of Sex Research, 2, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiefer, L. (2001). A new view of women’s sexual problems: Why new? Why now? Journal of Sex Research, 38, 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallen, K., & Lloyd, E. A. (2008). Clitoral variability compared with penile variability supports nonadaptation of female orgasm. Evolution & Development, 10, 1–2. doi:10.1111/j.1525-14X.2007.00207.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, C., & Chiauzzi, E. (1982). The role of orgasm in male and female sexual enjoyment. Journal of Sex Research, 18, 146–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiederman, M. (1997). Pretending orgasm during sexual intercourse: Correlates in a sample of young adult women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 23, 131–139. doi:10.1080/00926239708405314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zietsch, B. P., Miller, G. F., Bailey, J. M., & Martin, N. G. (2011). Female orgasm rates are largely independent of other traits: Implications for “Female Orgasmic Disorder” and evolutionary theories of orgasm. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 2305–2316. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02300.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a University Fellowship awarded to Erin B. Cooper by Temple University. Authors would like to acknowledge and thank Abigail Seelbach and Ashley Hampton for their assistance in collecting data for these studies. The authors would also like to thank the Richard G. Heimberg and the reviewers of this article for their thoughtful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin B. Cooper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, E.B., Fenigstein, A. & Fauber, R.L. The Faking Orgasm Scale for Women: Psychometric Properties. Arch Sex Behav 43, 423–435 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0212-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0212-z

Keywords

  • Female orgasm
  • Fake orgasm
  • Sexuality
  • Couples
  • Women