The Faking Orgasm Scale for Women: Psychometric Properties

Abstract

The Faking Orgasm Scale for Women (FOS) was designed to assess women’s self-reported motives for faking orgasm during oral sex and sexual intercourse. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on the responses of 481 heterosexual undergraduate females (M age = 20.33 years, SD = 2.48). Results of the EFA revealed that the FOS–Sexual Intercourse Subscale was composed of four factors: (1) Altruistic Deceit, faking orgasm out of concern for a partner’s feelings; (2) Fear and Insecurity, faking orgasm to avoid negative emotions associated with the sexual experience; (3) Elevated Arousal, a woman’s attempt to increase her own arousal through faking orgasm; and (4) Sexual Adjournment, faking orgasm to end sex. The analysis of the FOS–Oral Sex Subscale yielded four factors: (1) Altruistic Deceit; (2) Insecure Avoidance, faking orgasm to avoid feelings of insecurity; (3) Elevated Arousal; and (4) Fear of Dysfunction, faking orgasm to cope with concerns of being abnormal. Each factor of the two subscales was found to have excellent internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis on a separate sample of 398 heterosexual female undergraduates (M age = 20.52 years, SD = 2.55) confirmed the factor structure of each subscale with excellent fit statistics. The FOS should allow researchers and clinicians to better understand why women fake orgasm. Deepening this understanding may serve future research examining sexual desire, satisfaction, and dysfunction as well as have applications in sex and couples’ therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Entire pool of items available from the corresponding author upon request.

  2. 2.

    Entire pool of items available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Allen, D. G., Hayton, J. C., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205. doi:10.1177/1094428104263675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 46, 887–909. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-28039-4_11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bancroft, J., Loftus, J., & Long, J. S. (2003). Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 193–208. doi:10.1023/A:1023420431760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Basson, R. (2000). The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 51–65. doi:10.1080/009262300278641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Basson, R. (2001). Using a difference model for female sexual response to address women’s problematic low sexual desire. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 395–403. doi:10.1080/713846827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Basson, R. (2006). Sexual desire and arousal disorders in women. New England Journal of Medicine, 354, 1497–1506. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp050154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bentler, P. M. (2008). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brewer, G., & Hendrie, C. A. (2011). Evidence to suggest that copulatory vocalizations are not a reflexive consequence of orgasm. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 559–564. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9632-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology & Sociobiology, 9, 291–317. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(88)90010-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Comrey, A., & Lee, H. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper, E. B., Conner, B. T., & Fauber, R. L. (2010, November). Motivations for faking orgasm as predictors of sexual functioning and satisfaction. Paper session presented at the LGBT Special Interest Group sponsored symposium at the meeting of the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, San Diego, CA.

  14. Cooper, E. B., & Fenigstein, A. (2004). Orgasms re-examined: Motivations behind why women fake orgasms. Unpublished manuscript.

  15. Cooper, E. B., Morrison, A. S., & Heimberg, R. G. (2012, November). The effects of depression and social anxiety on the decision to fake orgasm among different ethnic groups. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, National Harbor, MD.

  16. Costa, R. M., & Brody, S. (2007). Women’s relationship quality is associated with specifically penile–vaginal intercourse orgasm and frequency. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 33, 319–327. doi:10.1080/00926230701385548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Darling, C., & Davidson, J. (1986). Enhancing relationships: Understanding the feminine mystique of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 12, 182–196. doi:10.1080/00926238608415405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dove, N., & Wiederman, M. (2000). Cognitive distraction and women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 67–78. doi:10.1080/009262300278650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fahs, B. (2010). Radical refusals: On the anarchist politics of women choosing asexuality. Sexualities, 13, 445–461. doi:10.1177/1363460710370650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Finch, J. F., & West, S. G. (1997). The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 439–485. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Floyd, J. F., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Graham, C. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for female orgasmic disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 256–270. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9542-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Graham, C., Bancroft, J., Doll, H., Greco, T., & Tanner, A. (2007). Does oral contraceptive-induced reduction in free testosterone adversely affect the sexuality or mood of women? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32, 246–255. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.12.0011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation to sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haavio-Mannila, E., & Kontula, O. (1997). Correlates of increased sexual satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 399–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Heiman, J. R. (2007). Orgasmic disorders in women. In S. R. Leiblum (Ed.), Principles and practices of sex therapy (pp. 84–123). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hite, S. (1976). The Hite report: A nationwide study on female sexuality. Oxford, UK: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jackson, S., & Scott, S. (2002). Embodying orgasm. Women and Therapy, 24, 99–110. doi:10.1300/J015v24n01_13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jagose, A. (2010). Counterfeit pleasures: Fake orgasm and queer agency. Textual Practice, 24, 517–539. doi:10.1080/09502361003690849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaighobadi, F., Shackelford, T. K., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2012). Do women pretend orgasm to retain a mate? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1121–1125. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9874-6.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. King, R., Belsky, J., Mah, K., & Binik, Y. (2011). Are there different types of female orgasm? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 865–875. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9639-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Komisaruk, B. R., Beyer-Flores, C., & Whipple, B. (2006). The science of orgasm. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999). Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 537–544. doi:10.1001/jama.300.4.395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mah, K., & Binik, Y. (2001). The nature of human orgasm: A critical review of major trends. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 823–856. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00069-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mah, K., & Binik, Y. (2005). Are orgasms in the mind or the body? Psychosocial versus physiological correlates of orgasmic pleasure and satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 31, 187–200. doi:10.1080/00926230590513401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. Oxford: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  40. McFarlane, M., & Lawrence St, J. S. (1999). Adolescents’ recall of sexual behavior: Consistency of self-report and effect of variations in recall duration. Journal of Adolescent Health, 25, 199–206. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00156-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McKibbin, W. F., Bates, V. M., Shackelford, T. K., Hafen, C. A., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2010). Risk of sperm competition moderates the relationship between men’s satisfaction with their partner and men’s interest in their partner’s copulatory orgasm. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 961–966. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Meston, C. M., Hull, E., Levin, R. J., & Sipski, M. (2004). Disorders of orgasm in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 1, 66–68. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.10110.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Shippee, S. K. (2010). Men’s and women’s reports of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 552–567. doi:10.1080/00224490903171794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nusbaum, M. R., Helton, M. R., & Ray, N. (2004). The changing nature of women’s health concerns through the midlife years. Maturitas, 49, 283–291. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.06.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Potts, A. (2000). Coming, coming, gone: A feminist deconstruction of heterosexual orgasm. Sexualities, 3, 55–76. doi:10.1177/136346000003001003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Reise, S., Waller, N., & Comrey, A. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12, 287–297. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.3.287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Robinson, W. J. (1917). Woman: Her sex and love life. New York: Eugenics Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sinha, A., & Palep-Singh, M. (2008). Taking a sexual history. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 18, 49–50. doi:10.1016/j.ogrm.2007.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Smith, R. L. (1984). Human sperm competition. In R. L. Smith (Ed.), Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems (pp. 601–659). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., & Comer, R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1601–1615. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-28039-4_15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tiefer, L. (1991). Historical, scientific, clinical, and feminist criticisms of “The human sexual response cycle”. Annual Review of Sex Research, 2, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tiefer, L. (2001). A new view of women’s sexual problems: Why new? Why now? Journal of Sex Research, 38, 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wallen, K., & Lloyd, E. A. (2008). Clitoral variability compared with penile variability supports nonadaptation of female orgasm. Evolution & Development, 10, 1–2. doi:10.1111/j.1525-14X.2007.00207.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Waterman, C., & Chiauzzi, E. (1982). The role of orgasm in male and female sexual enjoyment. Journal of Sex Research, 18, 146–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wiederman, M. (1997). Pretending orgasm during sexual intercourse: Correlates in a sample of young adult women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 23, 131–139. doi:10.1080/00926239708405314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zietsch, B. P., Miller, G. F., Bailey, J. M., & Martin, N. G. (2011). Female orgasm rates are largely independent of other traits: Implications for “Female Orgasmic Disorder” and evolutionary theories of orgasm. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 2305–2316. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02300.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a University Fellowship awarded to Erin B. Cooper by Temple University. Authors would like to acknowledge and thank Abigail Seelbach and Ashley Hampton for their assistance in collecting data for these studies. The authors would also like to thank the Richard G. Heimberg and the reviewers of this article for their thoughtful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin B. Cooper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, E.B., Fenigstein, A. & Fauber, R.L. The Faking Orgasm Scale for Women: Psychometric Properties. Arch Sex Behav 43, 423–435 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0212-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Female orgasm
  • Fake orgasm
  • Sexuality
  • Couples
  • Women