Abstract
The study aimed to identify implicit and explicit processes involved in reporting the sexual attractiveness of photographs of the same pubescent girls labeled as either under or within the age of sexual consent in the UK, women, and men. In two studies, 53 and 70 heterosexual men (M age 25.2 and 31.0 years) rated the sexual attractiveness of photographs in each category presented via computer [seeing target photographs of girls labeled as either under- (14–15 years) or within the age of consent (16–17 years)], using a 7-point response box. Ratings in Study 1 were in response to a question asking participants to rate how sexually attractive the person in each photograph was. In Study 2, participants rated how sexually attractive they personally found the target. Response times were also recorded. Several findings were replicated in both studies (although the strength of findings differed). Mean ratings of the sexual attractiveness of the underage girls were lower than those of overage girls and women. In addition, correlations revealed significantly longer responding times when “underage” girls (and men) were rated as more highly sexually attractive. No such relationship emerged with the same girls labeled within the age of consent or women. Overall, these data suggest that men find pubescent girls identified as being under the age of consent sexually attractive, but inhibit their willingness to report this; the greater the attraction, the greater the inhibition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., & Cantor, J. M. (2012). Sexual attraction to others: A comparison of two models of alloerotic responding in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 13–29.
Ebsworth, M., & Lalumiere, M. L. (2012). Viewing time as a measure of bisexual sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 161–172.
Hirschfeld, M. (2000). The homosexuality of men and women (M. Lombardi-Nash, Trans.). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. (Originally published 1914)
Kendrick, D. T. D., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.
Lykins, A. D., Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Dickey, R., Klassen, P. E., et al. (2010). Sexual arousal to female children in gynephilic men. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 279–289.
Posner, R. A., & Silbaugh, K. B. (1996). A guide to America’s sex laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rullo, J. E., Strassberg, D. S., & Israel, E. (2010). Category-specificity in sexual interest in gay men and lesbians. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 874–879.
Salopek, P. (2004). Early marriage survives in the U.S. Retrieved from http://www.azcentral.com/families/articles/1228fam_earlymarriage.html.
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1996). The evolution of human sexuality. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 98–102.
Wasoff, F., & Martin, C. (2005). Scottish social attitudes survey 2004. Family module report. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Donnell, M., Lowe, R., Brotherton, H. et al. Heterosexual Men’s Ratings of Sexual Attractiveness of Pubescent Girls: Effects of Labeling the Target as Under or Over the Age of Sexual Consent. Arch Sex Behav 43, 267–271 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0192-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0192-z