Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 42, Issue 8, pp 1415–1423 | Cite as

Examining the Possible Functions of Kissing in Romantic Relationships

Original Paper

Abstract

Recent research suggests that romantic kissing may be utilized in human sexual relationships to evaluate aspects of a potential mate’s suitability, to mediate feelings of attachment between pair-bonded individuals, or to facilitate arousal and initiate sexual relations. This study explored these potential functions of romantic kissing by examining attitudes towards the importance of kissing in the context of various human mating situations. The study involved an international online questionnaire, which was completed by 308 male and 594 female participants aged 18–63 years. Support was found for the hypothesis that kissing serves a useful mate-assessment function: women, high mate-value participants, and participants high in sociosexual orientation placed greater importance on kissing in romantic relationships and stated that an initial kiss was more likely to affect their attraction to a potential mate than did men, low-mate value participants or low sociosexual orientation participants. Kissing also seemed to be utilized in the mediation of pair-bond attachments: kissing was seen to be more important at established stages of relationships by low sociosexual participants, kissing was generally seen as more important in long-term relationship contexts (but particularly so by women), and kissing frequency was found to be related to relationship satisfaction. The findings of this research showed very little evidence to support the hypothesis that the primary function of kissing is to elevate levels of arousal.

Keywords

Romantic kissing Pair-bonding Attachment Mate choice Mate value Sociosexual orientation 

References

  1. Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethnology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., & Bratslavsky, E. (1999). Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 49–67. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjorklund, D. F., & Schackelford, T. K. (1999). Differences in parental investment contribute to important differences between men and women. Psychological Science, 8, 86–89. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00020.Google Scholar
  4. Brewis, J., & Linstead, S. (2000). “The worst thing is the screwing”: Consumption and the management of identity in sex work. Gender, Work and Organization, 7, 84–97. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byers, S., & Heinlein, L. (1989). Predicting initiations and refusals of sexual activities in married and cohabiting heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 210–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calhim, S., Shi, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2006). Sexual segregation among feral goats: Testing between alternative hypotheses. Animal Behaviour, 72, 31–41. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.08.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Candolin, U. (2003). The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 78, 575–595.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter, C. S. (1998). Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 779–818.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins, S. A., & Missing, C. (2003). Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women. Animal Behaviour, 65, 997–1004. doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowan, F. M., Copas, A., Johnson, A. M., Ashley, R., Corey, L., & Mindel, A. (2002). Herpes simplex virus type 1 infection: A sexually transmitted infection of adolescence? Sexually Transmitted Infections, 78, 346–348.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. de Graaf, H., Vanwesenbeeck, I., Meijer, S., Woertman, L., & Meeus, W. (2009). Sexual trajectories during adolescence: Relation to demographic characteristics and sexual risk. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 276–282. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9281-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Denney, N. W., Field, J. K., & Quadagno, D. (1984). Sex differences in sexual needs and desires. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13, 233–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2010). The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 260–268. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Durham, T. M., Malloy, T., & Hodges, E. D. (1993). Halitosis: Knowing when “bad breath” signals systemic disease. Geriatrics, 48, 55–59. doi:10.1515/semi.1974.12.3.189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1972). Love and hate: The natural history of behavior patterns. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  17. Ellis, B. J., & Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Sex Research, 27, 527–555. doi:10.1080/00224499009551579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Esch, T., & Stefano, G. B. (2005). The neurobiology of love. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 26, 175–192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher, H. E. (1982). Sex contract: The evolution of human behavior. New York: Granada.Google Scholar
  21. Fisher, H. E. (1992). Anatomy of love: A natural history of mating, marriage, and why we stray. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2006). Romantic love: A mammalian brain system for mate choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 361, 2173–2186. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1938.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Floyd, K., Boren, J., Hannawa, A., Hesse, C., McEwan, B., & Veksler, A. (2009). Kissing in marital and cohabiting relationships: Effects on blood lipids, stress, and relationship satisfaction. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 113–133. doi:10.1080/10570310902856071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ford, C. S., & Beach, F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. Oxford: Harper and Paul B Hoeber.Google Scholar
  25. Grammer, K., Fink, B., & Neave, N. (2005). Human pheromones and sexual attraction. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 118, 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.08.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Grammer, K., Kruck, K., Juette, A., & Fink, B. (2000). Non-verbal behavior as courtship signals: The role of control and choice in selecting partners. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 371–390.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233–242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Grewen, K. M., Girdler, S. S., Amico, J. A., & Light, K. C. (2005). Effects of partner support on resting oxytocin, cortisol, norepinephrine, and blood pressure before and after warm partner contact. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 531–538. doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000170341.88395.47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Guerrero, L. K., & Andersen, P. A. (1991). The waxing and waning of relational intimacy: Touch as a function of relational stage, gender and touch avoidance. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 147–165. doi:10.1177/0265407591082001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gulledge, A. K., Gulledge, M. H., & Stahmannn, R. F. (2003). Romantic physical affection types and relationship satisfaction. American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 233–242. doi:10.1080/01926180390201936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heiman, J. R., Long, J. S., Smith, S. N., Fisher, W. A., Sand, M. S., & Rosen, R. C. (2011). Sexual satisfaction and relationship happiness in midlife and older couples in five countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 741–753. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9703-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98. doi:10.2307/352430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes, S. M., Harrison, M. A., & Gallup, G. G. J. (2007). Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 612–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hughes, S. M., & Kruger, D. J. (2011). Sex differences in post-coital behaviors in long- and short-term mating: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 505–596. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.501915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, K. L., & Edwards, R. (1991). The effects of gender and type of romantic touch on perceptions of relational commitment. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 43–55. doi:10.1007/BF00997766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kavanagh, P. S., Robins, S. C., & Ellis, B. J. (2010). The mating sociometer: A regulatory mechanism for mating aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 120–132. doi:10.1037/a0018188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97–116. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kirshenbaum, S. (2011). The science of kissing: What our lips are telling us. New York: Grand Central Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Kleiman, D. G. (1977). Monogamy in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 52, 39–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Light, K. C., Grewen, K. M., & Amico, J. A. (2005). More frequent partner hugs and higher oxytocin levels are linked to lower blood pressure and heart rate in premenopausal women. Biological Psychology, 69, 5–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268, 39–44. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Macdonald, K., & Macdonald, T. M. (2010). The peptide that binds: A systematic review of oxytocin and its prosocial effects in humans. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18, 1–21. doi:10.3109/10673220903523615.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Marazziti, D., & Canale, D. (2004). Hormonal changes when falling in love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 931–936. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2003.08.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller, G. F. (2001). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  45. Nicholson, B. (1984). Does kissing aid human bonding by semiochemical addiction? British Journal of Dermatology, 3, 623–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Noe, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1994). Biological markets: Supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35, 1–11. doi:10.1007/BF00167053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parkinson, R. B. (1999). The tale of Sinuhe and other ancient Egyptian poems, 1940-1640 BC. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pawlowski, B. (1999). Withholding age as putative deception in mate search tactics. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 53–69. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00038-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Regan, P. C. (1998). What if you can’t get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1294–1303. doi:10.1177/01461672982412004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rikowski, A., & Grammer, K. (1999). Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266, 869–874.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Sacco, D. F., Hugenberg, K., & Sefcek, J. A. (2009). Sociosexuality and face perception: Unrestricted sexual orientation facilitates sensitivity to female facial cues. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 777–782. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schoch-Spana, M. (1992). Implications of pandemic influenza for bioterrorism response. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 31, 1409–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. Journal of Personality, 60, 31–51. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00264.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simpson, J. A., Gangestad, S. W., Bogart, H., Grudrein, D., Hall, M., Hutchins, L., … Williams, R. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality, 60, 870–883.Google Scholar
  57. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Thorne, F., Neave, N., Scholey, A., Moss, M., & Fink, B. (2002). Effects of putative male pheromones on female ratings of male attractiveness: Influence of oral contraceptives and the menstrual cycle. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23, 291–297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 175–201. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00005-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, R. D., Scheyd, G. J., McCollough, J. K., & Franklin, M. (2003). Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 668–678. doi:10.1093/beheco/arg043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B., & Lenton, A. P. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 15011–15016. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705290104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Townsend, J. M., & Wassermann, T. (1998). Sexual attractiveness sex differences in assessment and criteria. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 171–191. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00008-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  64. Tully, J., Viner, R. M., Coen, P. G., Stuart, J. M., Zambon, M., Peckham, C., … Booy, R. (2006). Risk and protective factors for meningococcal disease in adolescents: matched cohort study. British Medical Journal, 332, 445–450. doi:10.1136/bmj.38725.728472.BE.
  65. van Schaik, C. P., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1990). The evolution of monogamy in large primates: A new hypothesis and some crucial tests. Behaviour, 115, 30–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F., & Paepke, A. J. (1995). MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 260, 245–249. doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0087.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Wlodarski, R., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). Menstrual cycle effects on attitudes toward romantic kissing. Human Nature, Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s12110-013-9176-x.
  68. Zuckerman, M. (1971). Physiological measures of sexual arousal in the human. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 297–329.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations