Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 7–9 | Cite as

Bayesian Advice for Gaydar-based Picking Up: Commentary on Lyons, Lynch, Brewer, and Bruno (2013)

  • Martin PlöderlEmail author
Letter to the Editor

Consider the following: About 5 % of people are homosexual. Is it possible to detect from appearance if somebody is homosexual? This seems to be possible. In a recent study, participants were able to detect if somebody was homosexual better than chance. In this study, participants had to judge the sexual orientation of individuals based on 80 photographs of faces: 40 photographs depicted a homosexual person; the other 40 photographs depicted a heterosexual person. It turned out that 70 % of the homosexual persons were correctly identified. Of the heterosexual pictures, only 20 % were incorrectly classified as homosexual.

Now the question: Assume that all individuals can be as accurate in detecting sexual orientation as in this study. If one sees a randomly chosen individual in the street and judges the person to be homosexual, what is the chance (between 0 and 100 %) that the person is indeed homosexual?

You may be surprised that the correct answer is a quite low probability: 16 %.1...


False Alarm Sexual Orientation False Alarm Rate Physiological Assessment Youth Suicide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Conner, B. (1999). Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 538–547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chandra, A., Mosher, W. D., Copen, C., & Sionean, C. (2011, June 10). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the United States: Data from the 20062008 National Survey of Family Growth. National health statistics reports (No. 36). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from
  3. Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumiere, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010). Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 5–56.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoffrage, U., & Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences. Academic Medicine, 73, 538–540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoffrage, U., Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Communicating statistical information. Science, 290, 2261–2262.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnson, K. L., Gill, S., Reichman, V., & Tassinary, L. G. (2007). Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 321–334.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lyons, M., Lynch, A., Brewer, G., & Bruno, D. (2013). Detection of sexual orientation (“gaydar”) by homosexual and heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0144-7.
  8. Reis, B., & Saewyc, E. (1999). Eighty-three-thousand youth: Selected findings of eight population based studies as they pertain to anti-gay harassment and the safety and well-being of sexual minority students. The Safe Schools Coalition of Washington. Retrieved from
  9. Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, J. A., Gygax, L., Garcia, S., & Bailey, J. M. (2010). Dissecting “gaydar”: Accuracy and the role of masculinity–femininity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 124–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Seto, M. C. (2009). Pedophilia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 391–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tremblay, P., Plöderl, M., & Ramsay, R. (2012). Adolescent gay/lesbian suicide risk. An expanded homosexuality factor in adolescent suicide. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sonderauftrag für Suizidprävention, Christian-Doppler-KlinikSalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations