Health, Trust, or “Just Understood”: Explicit and Implicit Condom Decision-Making Processes Among Black, White, and Interracial Same-Sex Male Couples
- 641 Downloads
Among gay and bisexual men, primary partners are a leading source of HIV infection. Trust, intimacy, and advancements in HIV treatment may impact same-sex male (SSM) couples’ decisions to engage in unprotected anal intercourse (UAI). This qualitative study explored how Black, White and interracial couples discussed, and made decisions regarding condoms. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 48 SSM couples in the New York and San Francisco metropolitan areas. Stratified purposive sampling was used to include Black (n = 16), White (n = 17), and interracial (Black–White) (n = 15) couples. Twenty-six couples were concordant HIV-negative and 22 were HIV-discordant. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Some couples described explicit processes, which involved active discussion, while others described implicit processes, where condom-use decisions occurred without any explicit discussion. These processes also differed by race and HIV status. Black couples tended to report condom-use as “just understood.” White, HIV-discordant couples decided not to use condoms, with some identifying the HIV-positive partner’s suppressed viral load and high CD4 count as deciding factors. After an unplanned episode of UAI, White, HIV-negative couples tended to discontinue condom use while Black HIV-negative couples decided to revert to using condoms. HIV prevention efforts focused on same-sex, male couples must consider the explicit/implicit nature of condom decision-making processes. Understanding differences in these processes and considering relationship dynamics, across race and HIV status, can promote the development of innovative couple-level, HIV prevention interventions.
KeywordsSexual orientation Gay couples Black MSM HIV risk Safer sex Condom negotiation
The authors extend their thanks to the participants for their time and effort and to the Research Assistants Carla Garcia, Sean Arayasirikul, H. Lenn Keller, Pamela Valera, Anthony Morgan, Allison Hamburg, and Terry Dyer for their work recruiting, scheduling, and interviewing participants. This research was supported by Grant R01 #MH089276 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
- CDC. (2010). HIV among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM). Retrieved February 28, 2012 from www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm.
- CDC. (2011). HIV among African Americans. Retrieved February 28, 2012 from www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/aa.
- CDC. (2012). HIV infections attributed to male-to-male sexual contact—Metropolitan statistical areas, United States and Puerto Rico, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61, 962–966.Google Scholar
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). The landscape of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Grisham, K., Wilson, P., Gomez, A., Chakravarty, D., Neilands, T. B., Campbell, C., … Hoff, C. C. (2012). Racialized risk: Fear and fatalism among Black MSM in intimate relationships. Paper presented at the International AIDS Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Harawa, N. T., Greenland, S., Bingham, T. A., Johnson, D. F., Cochran, S. D., & Cunningham, W. E. (2004). Associations of race/ethnicity with HIV prevalence and HIV-related behaviors among young men who have sex with men in 7 urban centers in the United States. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 35, 526–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoff, C. C., Pals, S., Purcell, D., Parsons, J., Halkitis, P., & Remien, R. (2006). Examining the role of partner status in an HIV prevention trial targeting HIV-positive gay and bisexual men: The Seropositive Urban Men Intervention Trial (SUMIT). AIDS and Behavior, 10, 637–648.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoff, C. C., Stall, R., Paul, J., Acree, M., Daigle, D., & Phillips, K. (1997). Differences in sexual behavior among HIV discordant and concordant gay men in primary relationships. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 14, 546–559.Google Scholar
- Holt, M., Ellard, J., & de Wit, J. (2011). Are we prepared for biomedical HIV prevention? The case of pre-exposure prophylaxis. HIV Australia, 9, 12–14.Google Scholar
- Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Vernazza, P., Hirschel, B., Bernasconi, E., & Flepp, M. (2008). HIV-positive individuals without additional sexually transmitted diseases (STD) and on effective anti-retroviral therapy are sexually non-infectious. Bull des Medecins Suisses, 89, 165–169.Google Scholar
- Woods, D., & Fassnacht, C. (2007). Transana v2.23-MU (Version 2.2x). Madison, WI: The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.Google Scholar