Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 42, Issue 8, pp 1473–1486 | Cite as

The Role of Family Structure and Attachment in College Student Hookups

  • Chelsea Garneau
  • Spencer B. Olmstead
  • Kay Pasley
  • Frank D. Fincham
Original Paper


We examined the relationship between family structure and hooking up among emerging adults (N = 881) and the extent to which attachment moderated this relationship. Neither family structure nor number of structure transitions were related to the number of hookup partners in the past 12 months. Having an avoidant attachment, being an underclassman, consuming more alcohol, and not being in an exclusive relationship were related to having a greater number of hookup partners, and avoidant attachment was a stronger indicator of hooking up for men than for women. Among those who had hooked up in the past 12 months (63.8 %), family structure did not significantly differentiate those having a penetrative sex hookup (i.e., oral sex and/or intercourse) versus a non-penetrative sex hookup (i.e., kissing and/or sexual touching only). Findings were discussed in terms of their methodological implications for studying hookups, such as the collection of event level data and examining how family structure influences other correlates of hooking up.


Attachment Family structure Hooking up Emerging adulthood 


  1. Albrecht, C., & Teachman, J. D. (2003). Childhood living arrangements and the risk of premarital intercourse. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 867–894. doi:10.1177/0192513X03252731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.5.469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barriger, M., & Vélez-Blasini, C. J. (2013). Descriptive and injunctive social norm overestimation in hooking up and their role as predictors of hook-up activity in a college student sample. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 84–94. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.607928.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumer, E. P., & South, S. J. (2001). Community effects on youth sexual activity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 540–554. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00540.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogaert, A. F., & Sadava, S. (2002). Adult attachment and sexual behaviors. Personal Relationships, 9, 191–204. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Browning, C. R., Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2005). Sexual initiation in early adolescence: The nexus of parental and community control. American Sociological Review, 70, 758–778. doi:10.1177/000312240507000502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavanagh, S. E., & Huston, A. C. (2006). Family instability and children’s early problem behavior. Social Forces, 85, 551–581. doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cherlin, A. J. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403–419. doi:10.1111/j.17413737.2010.00710.x.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, M. L. (2002). Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: Evaluating the evidence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 14, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crowell, J. A., Treboux, D., & Brockmeyer, S. (2009). Parental divorce and adult children attachment representations and marital status. Attachment & Human Development, 11, 87–101. doi:10.1080/14616730802500867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Downing-Matibag, T. M., & Geisinger, B. (2009). Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: A health belief model perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1196–1209. doi:10.1177/1049732309344206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Epstein, M., Calzo, J. P., Smiler, A. P., & Ward, L. M. (2009). “Anything from making out to having sex”: Men’s negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 414–424. doi:10.1080/00224490902775801.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Patty, J. (1993). Adolescent’s interactions with the opposite sex: Influence of attachment style and gender. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 169–186. doi:10.1006/jado.1993.1015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010a). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010b). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 36, 346–359. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2010.488118.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Flack, W. F., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D’Aurelia, N. R., Gigliotti, S. N., et al. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139–157. doi:10.1177/0886260506295354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132–154. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.4.2.132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gentzler, A. L., & Kerns, K. A. (2004). Association between insecure attachment and sexual experiences. Personal Relationships, 11, 249–265. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00081.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S., & Dickinson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent & Family Health, 3, 103–112.Google Scholar
  24. Gute, G., & Eshbaugh, E. M. (2008). Personality as a predictor of hooking up among college students. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 25, 26–43. doi:10.1080/07370010701836385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Herold, E. S., Maticka-Tyndale, E., & Mewhinney, D. (1998). Predicting intentions to engage in casual sex. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 502–516. doi:10.1177/0265407598154004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2012). Talk about “hooking up”: The influence of college student social networks on nonrelationship sex. Health Communication, 27, 205–216. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.575540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelley, S. S., Borawski, E. A., Flocke, S. A., & Keen, K. J. (2003). The role of sequential and concurrent sexual relationships in the risk of sexually transmitted disease among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32, 296–305. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00710-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kraemer, H. C., & Blasey, C. M. (2006). Centering in regression analyses: A strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13, 141–151. doi:10.1002/mpr.170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levinson, R. A., Jaccard, J., & Beamer, L. (1995). Older adolescents’ engagement in casual sex: Impact of risk perception and psychosocial motivations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 349–364. doi:10.1007/BF01537601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis, M. A., Granato, H., Blayney, J. A., Lostutter, T. W., & Kilmer, J. R. (2012). Predictors of hooking up sexual behaviors and emotional reactions among U.S. college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1219–1229. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9817-2.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Miles, N. J., & Servaty-Seib, H. L. (2010). Parental marital status and young adult offsprings’ attitudes about marriage and divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 51, 209–220. doi:10.1080/10502551003597865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, B. C., Norton, M. C., Curtis, T., Hill, E. J., Schvaneveldt, P., & Young, M. H. (1997). The timing of sexual intercourse among adolescents: Family, peer, and other antecedents. Youth Society, 29, 54–83. doi:10.1177/0044118X97029001003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mullett, E., & Stolberg, A. L. (2002). Divorce and its impact on the intimate relationships of young adults. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 38, 39–59. doi:10.1300/J087v38n01_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olmstead, S. B., Pasley, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). Hooking up and penetrative hookups: Correlates that differentiate college men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 573–583. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9907-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 321–330. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331–341. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Owen, J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual sex’: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661. doi:10.1177/0265407502195006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experience. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0017504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791–804. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schachner, D. A., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Attachment dimensions and sexual motives. Personal Relationships, 11, 179–195. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00077.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stinson, R. D. (2010). Hooking up in young adulthood: A review of factors influencing sexual behavior of college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 24, 98–115. doi:10.1080/87568220903558596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tracy, J. L., Shaver, P. R., Albino, A. W., & Cooper, M. L. (2003). Attachment styles and adolescent sexuality. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romance and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 137–159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Digest of Education Statistics, 2010 (NCES 2011-015) (Chap. 3). Retrieved August 18, 2012 from
  47. Vander Ven, T., & Beck, J. (2009). Getting drunk and hooking up: An exploratory study of the relationship between alcohol intoxication and casual coupling in a university sample. Sociological Spectrum, 29, 626–648. doi:10.1080/02732170903051417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationship scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204. doi:10.1080/00223890701268041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Yu, T., & Adler-Baeder, F. (2009). The intergenerational transmission of relationship quality: The effects of parental remarriage quality on young adults’ relationships. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 47(3/4), 87–102. doi:10.1300/J087v47n03_0.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chelsea Garneau
    • 1
  • Spencer B. Olmstead
    • 2
  • Kay Pasley
    • 3
  • Frank D. Fincham
    • 4
  1. 1.Human Development and Family StudiesAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  2. 2.Department of Child and Family Studies, College of Education, Health, and Human SciencesUniversity of Tennessee KnoxvilleKnoxvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Family and Child Sciences, College of Human SciencesFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  4. 4.The FSU Family InstituteFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations