Men’s Oppressive Beliefs Predict Their Breast Size Preferences in Women

Abstract

Previous studies of men’s breast size preferences have yielded equivocal findings, with studies variously indicating a preference for small, medium, or large breasts. Here, we examined the impact of men’s oppressive beliefs in shaping their female breast size ideals. British White men from the community in London, England (N = 361) viewed figures of women that rotated in 360° and varied in breast size along five levels. They then rated the figure that they found most physically attractive and also completed measures assessing their sexist attitudes and tendency to objectify women. Results showed that medium breasts were rated most frequent as attractive (32.7 %), followed by large (24.4 %) and very large (19.1 %) breasts. Further analyses showed that men’s preferences for larger female breasts were significantly associated with a greater tendency to be benevolently sexist, to objectify women, and to be hostile towards women. These results were discussed in relation to feminist theories, which postulate that beauty ideals and practices in contemporary societies serve to maintain the domination of one sex over the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture and the body. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carter, P. (1996). Breast feeding and the social construction of heterosexuality, or ‘What breasts are really for’. In J. Holland & L. Adkins (Eds.), Sex, sensibility, and the gendered body (pp. 99–119). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cornelissen, P. L., Hancock, P. J. B., Kiviniemi, V., George, H. R., & Tovée, M. J. (2009). Patterns of eye movements when male and female observers judge female attractiveness, body fat, and waist-to-hip ratio. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dettwyler, K. A. (1995). Beauty and the breast: The cultural context of breastfeeding in the United States. In P. MacAdam & K. A. Dettwyler (Eds.), Breastfeeding: Biocultural perspectives (pp. 167–215). New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011). Eye-tracking of men’s preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 43–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dixson, B. J., Vasey, P. L., Sagata, K., Sibanda, N., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Men’s preferences for women’s breast morphology in New Zealand, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1271–1279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dworkin, A. (1974). Woman hating. New York: E. P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Einon, D. (2007). The shaping of women’s bodies: Men’s choice of fertility or heat stress avoidance? In V. Swami & A. Furnham (Eds.), The body beautiful: Evolutionary and sociocultural perspectives (pp. 131–158). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Forbes, G. B., Collinsworth, L. L., Jobe, R. L., Braun, K. D., & Wise, L. M. (2007). Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: Are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles, 5, 265–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Forbes, G. B., Jobe, R. L., & Revak, J. A. (2006). Relationships between dissatisfaction with specific body characteristics and the Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire-3 and Objectified Body Consciousness Scale. Body Image, 3, 295–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ford, C. S., & Beach, F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frederickson, B. L., Roberts, T. A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Furnham, A., Dias, M., & McClelland, A. (1998). The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles, 39, 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Furnham, A., & Swami, V. (2007). Perceptions of female buttocks and breast size in profile. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Furnham, A., Swami, V., & Shah, K. (2006). Female body correlates of attractiveness and other ratings. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallup, G. G. (1982). Permanent breast enlargement in human female: A sociobiological analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 19, 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gerald, W., & Potvin, L. (2009). Boobs, boxing, and bombs: Problematizing the entertainment of Spike TV. Spaces for Difference, 2, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gitter, A. G., Lomranz, J., Saxe, L., & Bar-Tal, D. (1983). Perception of female physique characteristics by American and Israeli students. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gurung, R. A. R., & Chrouser, C. J. (2007). Predicting objectification: Do provocative clothing and observer characteristics matter? Sex Roles, 57, 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harrison, K. (2003). Television viewers’ ideal body proportions: The case of the curvaceously thin woman. Sex Roles, 48, 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hill, M. S., & Fischer, A. R. (2008). Examining objectification theory: Lesbian and heterosexual women’s experiences with sexual- and self-objectification. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 745–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Horvath, T. (1981). Physical attractiveness: The influence of selected torso parameters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10, 21–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jacobi, L., & Cash, T. F. (1994). In pursuit of the perfect appearance: Discrepancies among self-ideal percepts of multiple physical attributes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kleinke, C. L., & Staneski, R. (1980). First impressions of female bust size. Journal of Social Psychology, 110, 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Koff, E., & Benavage, A. (1998). Breast size perception and satisfaction, body image, and psychological functioning in Caucasian and Asian American college women. Sex Roles, 38, 655–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Caldwell, C. A. (2011). Social learning and human mate preferences: A potential mechanism for generating and maintaining between-population diversity in attraction. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B, 366, 366–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical re-examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lynn, M. (2009). Determinants and consequences of female attractiveness and sexiness: Realistic tests with restaurant waitresses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 737–745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Manning, J., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G., & Leinster, S. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Marlowe, F. (1998). The nubility hypothesis: The human breast as an honest signal of residual reproductive value. Human Nature, 9, 263–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Martino, W., & Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2005). “Being normal is the only way to be”: Adolescents perspectives on gender and school. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mazur, A. (1986). US trends in feminine beauty and overadaptation. Journal of Sex Research, 22, 281–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Millsted, R., & Frith, H. (2003). Being large-breasted: Women negotiating embodiment. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26, 455–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pawłowski, B. (1999). Permanent breasts as a side effect of subcutaneous fat tissue increase in human evolution. Homo, 50, 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pond, C. M. (1998). The fats of life. New York: DK Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Salska, I., Frederick, D. A., Pawłowski, B., Reilly, A. H., Laird, K. T., & Rudd, N. A. (2008). Conditional mate preferences: Factors influencing preferences for height. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sanchez, D. T., Kiefer, A. K., & Ybarra, O. (2006). Sexual submissiveness in women: Costs for sexual autonomy and arousal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 512–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Seifert, T. (2005). Anthropomorphic characteristics of centerfold models: Trends towards slender figures over time. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37, 271–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breast size, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Smith, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., & Tovée, M. J. (2007). Color 3D bodies and judgments of human female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1978). A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 219–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious cycle of objectification. Sex Roles, 52, 707–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Swami, V. (2007). The missing arms of Vénus de Milo: Reflections on the science of physical attractiveness. Brighton: Book Guild.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Swami, V. (2008). Methodological and conceptual issues in the science of physical attraction. In I. L. Nillson & W. V. Lindberg (Eds.), Visual perception: New research (pp. 232–256). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Swami, V. (2011). Love at first sight? Individual differences and the psychology of initial romantic attraction. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, & A. Furnham (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences (pp. 747–772). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Swami, V., & Barrett, S. (2011). British men’s hair colour preferences: An assessment of courtship solicitation and stimulus ratings. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 595–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Swami, V., Buchanan, T., Furnham, A., & Tovée, M. J. (2008a). Five-factor personality correlates of perceptions of women’s body sizes. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 697–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Swami, V., Coles, R., Salem, N., Wilson, E., Wyrozumska, K., & Furnham, A. (2010a). Oppressive beliefs at play: Associations among beauty ideals and practices and individual differences in sexism, objectification of others, and media exposure. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Swami, V., Einon, D., & Furnham, A. (2006). An investigation of the leg-to-body ratio as a human aesthetic criterion. Body Image, 3, 317–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2008). The psychology of physical attraction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Swami, V., Furnham, A., Balakumar, N., Williams, C., Canaway, K., & Stanistreet, D. (2008b). Factors influencing preferences for height: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 395–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Swami, V., Furnham, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Akbar, K., Gordon, N., Harris, T.,…,Tovée, M. J. (2010b). More than skin deep? Personality information influences men’s ratings of the attractiveness of women’s body sizes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 628–647.

  59. Swami, V., & Harris, A. S. (2012). Evolutionary perspectives on physical appearance. In T. Cash (Ed.), Encylopedia of body image and human appearance (pp. 404–411). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

  60. Swami, V., Jones, J., Einon, D., & Furnham, A. (2009). Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist-to-hip ratio, breast size, and ethnic group in Britain and South Africa. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 313–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Swami, V., Miller, R., Furnham, A., Penke, L., & Tovée, M. J. (2008c). The influence of men’s sexual strategies on perceptions of women’s bodily attractiveness, health and fertility. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Swami, V., & Salem, N. (2011). The evolutionary psychology of human beauty. In V. Swami (Ed.), Evolutionary psychology: A critical introduction (pp. 131–182). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2009). Big beautiful women: The body size preferences of male fat admirers. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 89–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Swami, V., & Voracek, M. (in press). Associations among men’s sexist attitudes, objectification of women, and their own drive for muscularity. Psychology of Men and Masculinity.

  65. Tantleff-Dunn, S. (2001). Breast and chest size: Ideals and stereotypes through the 1990 s. Sex Roles, 45, 231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Tantleff-Dunn, S. (2002). Biggest isn’t always best: The effect of breast size on perceptions of women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2253–2265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2000). Breast and chest size satisfaction: Relation to overall body image and self-esteem. Eating Disorders, 8, 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Thompson, E. H., Pleck, J. H., & Ferrera, D. L. (1992). Men and masculinities: Scales for masculinity ideology and masculinity-related constructs. Sex Roles, 27, 573–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Thornhill, R., & Grammer, K. (1999). The body and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Tovée, M. J., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2001). Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. (2006). Breasts are for men: Media, masculinity ideologies, and men’s beliefs about women’s bodies. Sex Roles, 55, 703–714.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wiggins, J. S., Wiggins, N., & Conger, J. C. (1968). Correlates of heterosexual somatic preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 82–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Wolf, N. (1990). The beauty myth. London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Zelazniewicz, A. M., & Pawłowski, B. (2010). Female breast size attractiveness for men as a function of sociosexual orientation (restricted versus unrestricted). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1129–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viren Swami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swami, V., Tovée, M.J. Men’s Oppressive Beliefs Predict Their Breast Size Preferences in Women. Arch Sex Behav 42, 1199–1207 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0081-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Breast size
  • Physical attractiveness
  • Oppressive beliefs
  • Sexism
  • Objectification