Skip to main content

Women’s Rape Fantasies: An Empirical Evaluation of the Major Explanations

Abstract

This study evaluated explanations of rape fantasy in a sample of female undergraduates (N = 355) using a sexual fantasy checklist which included eight types of rape fantasy, participants’ detailed descriptions of a rape fantasy they have had, a rape fantasy scenario audio presentation, and measures of personality. Three explanations of rape fantasy were tested: openness to sexual experience, sexual desirability, and sexual blame avoidance. Women who were higher in erotophilia and self-esteem and who had more frequent consensual sexual fantasies and more frequent desirability fantasies, particularly of performing as a stripper, had more frequent rape fantasies. Women who were higher in erotophilia, openness to fantasy, desirability fantasies, and self-esteem reported greater sexual arousal to rape fantasies. Sexual blame avoidance theory was not supported; sexual desirability theory was moderately supported; openness to sexual experience theory received the strongest support.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. Descriptions in parentheses are shortened forms of the items that have been used for brevity in text and tables.

References

  • Bivona, J. M., & Critelli, J. W. (2009). The nature of women’s rape rantasies: An analysis of prevalence, frequency, and contents. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 33–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010). Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 5–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory and NEO five-factor inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critelli, J. W., & Bivona, J. M. (2008). Women’s erotic rape fantasies: An evaluation of theory and research. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 57–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deditius-Island, H. K., & Caruso, J. C. (2002). An examination of the reliability of scores from Zuckerman’s Sensation Seeking Scales, Form V. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 728–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., White, L. A., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 123–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, S. R., Balzano, B. F., & Stamey, R. (1991). Two studies of females’ sexual force fantasies. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy, 17, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grömping, U. (2006). Relative importance for linear regression in R: The package Relaimpo. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariton, E. B. (1973). The sexual fantasies of women. Psychology Today, 6, 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariton, E. B., & Singer, J. L. (1974). Women’s fantasies during sexual intercourse: Normative and theoretical implications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 313–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, F. E. (2001). Regression modeling strategies. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, F. E. (2012). rms: Regression modeling strategies. R package version 3.4-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms. Accessed 15 January 2012.

  • Hawley, P. H., & Hensley, W. A. (2009). Social dominance and forceful submission fantasies: Feminine pathology or power? Journal of Sex Research, 46, 568–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, H. (1983). Endless rapture. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J., LoPiccolo, L., & LoPiccolo, J. (1976). Becoming orgasmic: A sexual growth program for women. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanin, E. J. (1982). Female rape fantasies: A victimization study. Victimology: An International Journal, 7, 114–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knafo, D., & Jaffe, Y. (1984). Sexual fantasizing in males and females. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, W. (1987). Relative importance by averaging over orderings. American Statistician, 41, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman, R. H., Merenda, P. F., & Gold, R. Z. (1980). Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C. M., & Gorzalka, B. B. (1995). The effects of sympathetic activation on physiological and subjective sexual arousal in women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 651–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moreault, D., & Follingstad, D. R. (1978). Sexual fantasies of females as a function of sex guilt and experimental response cues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1385–1393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L., Barton-Henry, M., & Green, S. E. (1988). Subjective sexual arousal and involvement theory: Development of multiple indicators. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 412–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

  • Pelletier, L. A., & Herold, E. S. (1988). The relationship of age, sex guilt, and sexual experience with female sexual fantasies. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 250–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C., & Symons, D. (2003). Warrior lovers: Erotic fiction, evolution, and female sexuality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, J. L., & Horne, S. G. (2006). Guilty or not? A path model of women’s forceful sexual fantasies. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 368–377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. (1999). An analysis of empirical estimates of sexual aggression victimization and perpetration. Violence and Victims, 14, 241–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strassberg, D. S., & Lockerd, L. K. (1998). Force in women’s sexual fantasies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 403–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suschinsky, K. D., & Lalumière, M. L. (2011). Prepared for anything? An investigation of female genital arousal in response to rape cues. Psychological Science, 22, 159–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, C. (1987). The romance revolution: Erotic novels for women and the quest for a new sexual identity. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. The Stata Journal, 6(1), 58–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s alpha, Revelle’s beta, McDonald’s omega: Their relations with each and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioural expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph W. Critelli.

Appendix: Rape Fantasy Items

Appendix: Rape Fantasy Items

How often do you fantasize about each of the following?

  1. 1.

    Being overpowered or forced by a man to surrender sexually against my will (forced sex by a man)Footnote 1

  2. 2.

    Being overpowered or forced by a woman to surrender sexually against my will (forced sex by a woman)

  3. 3.

    Being overpowered or forced into a sexual act against my will because I was incapacitated due to drugs, alcohol or sleep (incapacitated)

  4. 4.

    Being overpowered or forced by a man to give him oral sex (forced oral sex by a man)

  5. 5.

    Being overpowered or forced by a woman to give her oral sex (forced oral sex by a woman)

  6. 6.

    Being overpowered or forced to have anal sex (forced anal sex)

  7. 7.

    Being raped by a man (raped by a man)

  8. 8.

    Being raped by a woman (raped by a woman)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bivona, J.M., Critelli, J.W. & Clark, M.J. Women’s Rape Fantasies: An Empirical Evaluation of the Major Explanations. Arch Sex Behav 41, 1107–1119 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9934-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9934-6

Keywords

  • Rape
  • Rape fantasy
  • Sexual fantasy
  • Personality
  • Forced sex
  • Submission