Age Preferences in Dating Advertisements by Homosexuals and Heterosexuals: From Sociobiological to Sociological Explanations
- 1.4k Downloads
Current sociobiological thought suggests that significant components of mate selection are based on indicators that correlate with the ability to produce and support offspring. Theorists have suggested that men tend to be attracted to and marry younger women, while women tend to be attracted to and marry older men. This behavior is referred to as age hypergamy. I complicate this picture by using gay men as a population in which to explore alternative components of mate selection as reflected in our behavior. Analyses of 120 dating advertisements from gay men and heterosexual men and women indicated that there exists a good measure of hypergamic age preference that is comparable to the heterosexual population and that relates to subjects’ gender presentation. Data suggest that the biological-reproductive theory of age hypergamy is incomplete and support a cultural reproduction model of gender role behavior and preference in both heterosexuals and homosexuals.
KeywordsMating preferences Homosexuals Meme theory Dating ads Hypergamy
- Bay Windows. http://www.baywindows.com. Accessed Sept–Dec 2003.
- Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection. American Scientist, 73, 47–51.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, R. (1999). The extended phenotype. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Distin, K. (2005). The selfish meme: A critical reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gay People’s Chronicle. http://www.gaypeopleschronicle.com. Accessed Sept–Dec 2003.
- Holmes, R. M., Little, K. C., & Welsh, D. P. (2008). Dating and romantic relationships, adulthood. In D. Carr, R. Crosnoe, M. E. Hughes, & A. Pienta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the life course and human development (pp. 89–91). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Hou, C. (2002). What’s the difference between online love in the East and the West? A comparative analysis of online personal ads from perspectives of culture, gender and sexual orientation. Retrieved 21 Sept 2003 from teens.theweb.org.tw/iscenter/conference2002/thesis/files/20020409071704188.8.131.52.doc.
- Just Out. http://www.justout.com/. Accessed Sept–Dec 2003.
- Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Philadelphia Gay News. http://www.epgn.com/. Accessed Sept–Dec 2003.
- Posner, R. (1992). Sex and reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Qian, Z. (2008). Mate selection. In D. Carr, R. Crosnoe, M. E. Hughes, & A. Pienta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the life course and human development (pp. 266–270). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Queer Information Network. http://manifestonews.org/QIN/Publications/. Accessed 25 Aug 2003.
- Quest Online. http://www.quest-online.com/. Accessed Sept–Dec 2003.
- Rolf, K., & Ferrie., J. (2008). The May–December relationship since 1850: Age homogamy in the U.S. Working Paper. Accessed 27 May 2011 from http://paa2008.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=80695.
- Shorter, E. (1976). The making of the modern family. New York: Collins.Google Scholar
- Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- The San Francisco Bay Guardian. http://www.sfbg.com/. Accessed Sept–Dec 2003.
- Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. Santa Cruz, CA: Benjamin Cummings Publishing.Google Scholar
- Valentine, D. (2007). Imagining transgender: An ethnography of a category. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Washington Blade Online. http://washblade.com. Accessed Sept–Dec 2003.
- Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- Windy City Times. http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/. Accessed Sept–Dec 2003.