The Validity of Implicit Association Test (IAT) Measures of Sexual Attraction to Children: A Meta-Analysis
- 1.4k Downloads
The current study presents a quantitative review of the discriminative and convergent validity of Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures adapted to assess sexual interest in children. IAT measures were able to distinguish sex offenders against children (SOC) from non-SOC (M weighted d from random-effects = 0.63, 95 % CI [0.42–0.83], N = 707, k = 12). The largest group differences were found between SOC and non-offenders, followed by non-sex offenders and rapists. IAT measures using sex versus not sex (and similar attribute categories, such as sex vs. neutral) provided superior discrimination compared to IAT measures using sexy versus not sexy (and similar attribute categories, such as erotic vs. non-erotic). The IAT measures had a moderate relationship to self-report (r = .27, 95 % CI [.13–.40], N = 182), sexual offense history variables (r = .27, 95 % CI [.08–.43], N = 145), and viewing time (r = .30, 95 % CI [.16–.43], N = 180) measures of sexual interest in children. Although these IAT measures can discriminate between groups and show convergence with other measures of sexual interest, a better understanding of the construct validity of these tools is required before their use in the assessment, treatment, and supervision of sex offenders.
KeywordsSexual interest Pedophilia Implicit Association Test Meta-analysis
- Reference marked with an asterisk was used in the meta-analysis. Google Scholar
- *Babchishin, K. M., Nunes, K. L., & Kessous, N. (2011). A multimodal examination of sexual interest in children. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- *Banse, R., Schmidt, A. F., & Clarbour, J. (2010). Indirect measures of sexual interest in child sex offenders: A multimethod approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 319–335. doi:10.1177/0093854809357598.
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 2). Englewood, NJ: Biostat, Inc.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- *Gray, N. S., Brown, A. S., MacCulloch, M. J., Smith, J., & Snowden, R. J. (2005). An Implicit Association Test of the associations between children and sex in pedophiles. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 304–308. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.304.
- Greenwald, A. G. (2004, January). Revised top 10 list of things wrong with the IAT. Invited presentation at Attitudes Preconference of the 5th annual meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
- Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis (User Report #2004-02). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.Google Scholar
- Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Kazdin, A. E. (2003). Research design in clinical psychology (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Laws, D. R. (1986). Sexual deviance card sort. Unpublished manuscript, Florida Mental Health Institute, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
- Marshall, W. L., Anderson, D., & Fernandez, Y. (1999). Cognitive behavioral treatment of sexual offenders. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- *Mihailides, S., Devilly, G. J., & Ward, T. (2004). Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 333–350. doi:10.1023/B:SEBU.0000043327.10168.5b.
- Nichols, H. R., & Molinder, I. (2000). Multiphasic Sex Inventory (2nd ed.). Tacoma, WA: Crime and Victim Psychology Specialists.Google Scholar
- Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior (pp. 265–292). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- *Nunes, K. L., Firestone, P., & Baldwin, M. W. (2007). Indirect assessment of cognitions of child sexual abusers with the Implicit Association Test. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 454–475. doi:10.1177/0093854806291703.
- *Ó Ciardha, C. (2009). Uses of implicit cognitive measures in the assessment of sex offenders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Trinity College, Dublin.Google Scholar
- Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 19–63). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- *Schmidt, A. F., & Banse, R. (2010, July). Indirect measures of sexual interest in child sex offenders: A multimethod approach and its clinical implications. Paper presented at the International Summer Conference in Forensic Psychiatry, Regensburg.Google Scholar
- *Schmidt, A. F., Gykiere, K., Vanhoeck, K., Mann, R. E., & Banse, R. (2011). Direct and indirect measures of sexual maturity preferences differentiate subtypes of child sex abusers. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I., & Hayes, T. L. (2009). Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 97–128. doi:10.1348/000711007X255327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spiering, M., & Everaerd, W. (2007). The sexual unconscious. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 166–184). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- *Steffens, M. C., Yundina, E., & Panning, M. (2008). Automatic associations with “erotic” in child sexual offenders: Identifying those in danger of reoffence. Sexual Offender Treatment, 3, 1–9.Google Scholar
- *Thornton, D., McKee, R., & Ó Ciardha, C. (2009, October). Convergent and divergent validity of implicit measures of sexual interest among SVPs. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abuse, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
- Tryon, W. W. (2001). Evaluating statistical significance difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests. Psychological Methods, 6, 371–386. doi:10.1037//1082-989x.6.4.371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- *van Leeuwen, M. L., van Baaren, R. B., Chakhssi, F., Loonen, M. G. M., Lippman, M., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2011). Detecting implicit associations in non-incarcerated pedophiles: Exploring generalizability, specificity and behavior predictability. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar