Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 42, Issue 7, pp 1181–1189 | Cite as

Is a Woman’s Preference for Chest Hair in Men Influenced by Parasite Threat?

  • Pavol Prokop
  • Markus J. Rantala
  • Muhammet Usak
  • Ibrahim Senay
Original Paper

Abstract

Humans (Homo sapiens) are unique primates due to a lack of a thermally insulating fur covering, typical of all other primates. Our primary goal was to examine the “ectoparasite avoidance mediated by mate choice hypothesis” suggesting that women prefer men lacking chest hair in order to avoid ectoparasite loads. We predicted that women living in areas with high prevalence of pathogens (n = 161) would be less likely to show a preference for a male with chest hair in comparison with women living in areas with low pathogen prevalence (n = 183). We found that overall preference for man chest hair was low, but there were no significant associations between perceived vulnerability to diseases or disgust sensitivity and preference of men who have had experimentally removed chest hair. Women who lived in an environment with a high parasite prevalence rate (Turkey) showed a similar preference for man chest hair as did women from an environment with low parasite prevalence (Slovakia). The participants biological fathers’ chest hair had no significant effect on their preference for men with chest hair. Women living in a high-parasite-prevalence environment reported a higher disgust score in the sexual domain and more recent experiences with illnesses, suggesting that parasites influence sensitivity to sexual disgust. These results provide no support for the ectoparasite avoidance hypothesis mediated by mate choice and suggest that shaved men bodies are preferred more by women.

Keywords

Body hair Disgust Homo sapiens Parasites 

References

  1. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bakker, T. C. M. (1993). Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature, 363, 255–257. doi:10.1038/363255a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belt, T. (1874). The naturalist in Nicaragua. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  4. Curtis, V., & Biran, A. (2001). Dirt, disgust, and disease: Is hygiene in our genes? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 44, 17–31. doi:10.1353/pbm.2001.0001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  6. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L. M., & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 277, 2405–2410. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2184.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Bishop, P. J., & Parish, A. (2010). Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: A New Zealand–US comparative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 798–806. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9441-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Li, B. G., & Anderson, M. J. (2007a). Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 88–95. doi:10.1002/ajhb.20584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Morgan, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007b). Human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 369–375. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9093-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixson, A. F., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M. J. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 29–39. doi:10.1023/A:1021889228469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan, L. A., Schaller, M., & Park, J. H. (2009). Perceived vulnerability to disease: Development and validation of a 15-item self-report instrument. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 541–546. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faulkner, J., Schaller, M., Park, J. H., & Duncan, L. A. (2004). Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 333–353. doi:10.1177/1368430204046142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fessler, D. M. T. (2001). Luteal phase immunosuppression and meat eating. Rivista di Biologia, 94, 403–426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fessler, D. M. T., Eng, S. J., & Navarrete, C. D. (2005). Elevated disgust sensitivity in the first trimester of pregnancy: Evidence supporting the compensatory prophylaxis hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 344–351. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fessler, D. M. T., & Navarrete, C. D. (2003). Domain-specific variation in disgust sensitivity across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 406–417. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00054-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, R. A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenic Review, 7, 184–192.Google Scholar
  17. Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89–96. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(93)90009-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 75–95. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1702_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (2008). Human oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 275, 991–1000. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guerniér, V., Hochberg, M. E., & Guégan, J. F. (2004). Ecology drives the worldwide distribution of human diseases. PLoS Biology, 2, 740–746. doi:10.1371/journal/pbio.0020141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R., & Law Smith, M. J. (2008). Effects of menstrual cycle on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 78–84. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9268-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L. G., Cornwell, R. E., Feinberg, D. R., et al. (2005). Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 272, 347–354. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lie, H. C., Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. (2008). Genetic diversity revealed in human faces. Evolution, 62, 2473–2486. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00478.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & Burriss, R. P. (2007). Preferences for masculinity in male bodies change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 31, 633–639. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Low, B. (1990). Marriage systems and pathogen stress in human societies. American Zoologist, 30, 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McHenry, H. M. (2009). Human evolution. In M. Ruse & J. Travis (Ed.), Evolution: The first four billion years (pp. 265–280). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Navarrete, C. D., Fessler, D. M. T., & Eng, S. J. (2007). Elevated ethnocentrism in the first trimester of pregnancy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 60–65. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oaten, M., Stevenson, R. J., & Case, T. I. (2009). Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 303–321. doi:10.1037/a0014823.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pagel, M., & Bodmer, W. (2003). A naked ape would have fewer parasites. Biology Letters, 270(Suppl. 1), S117–S119. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0041.Google Scholar
  30. Penton-Voak, I. S., Jacobson, A., & Trivers, R. (2004). Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 355–370. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2011). The effect of owning animals on perceived vulnerability to, and avoidance of, parasitic diseases in humans. Journal of Individual Differences, 32, 129–136. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prokop, P., Fančovičová, J., & Fedor, P. (2010). Health is associated with anti-parasite behavior and fear of disease-relevant animals in humans. Ecological Psychology, 22, 222–237. doi:10.1080/10407413.2010.496676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prokop, P., Rantala, M. J., & Fančovičová, J. (2012). Is plasticity in mating preferences adapted to perceived exposure to pathogens? Acta Ethologica, 15, 135–140. doi:10.1007/s10211-011-0118-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prokop, P., Usak, M., & Fančovičová, J. (2010a). Health and the avoidance of macroparasites: A preliminary cross-cultural study. Journal of Ethology, 28, 345–351. doi:10.1007/s10164-009-0195-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prokop, P., Usak, M., & Fančovičová, J. (2010b). Risk of parasite transmission influences perceived vulnerability to disease and perceived danger of disease-relevant animals. Behavioural Processes, 85, 52–57. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramsey, S., Sweeney, C., Fraser, M., & Oades, G. (2009). Pubic hair and sexuality: A review. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 2102–2110. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01307.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rantala, M. J. (1999). Human nakedness: Adaptation against ectoparasites? International Journal for Parasitology, 29, 1987–1989.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rantala, M. J. (2007). The evolution of nakedness in Homo sapiens. Journal of Zoology, 273, 1–7. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00295.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rantala, M. J., & Marcinkowska, U. M. (2011). The role of sexual imprinting and the Westermarck effect in mate choice in humans. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 859–873. doi:10.1007/s00265-011-1145-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rantala, M. J., Polkki, M., & Rantala, L. M. (2010). Preference for human male body hair changes across the menstrual cycle and menopause. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 419–423. doi:10.1093/beheco/arp206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Regan, P. C. (1996). Rhythms of desire: The association between menstrual cycle phases and female sexual desire. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5, 145–156.Google Scholar
  43. Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rogers, A. R., Iltis, D., & Wooding, S. (2004). Genetic variation at the MC1R locus and the time since loss of human body hair. Current Anthropology, 45, 105–108. doi:10.1086/381006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. (2000). Disgust. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 637–653). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  46. Schaller, M. (2006). Parasites, behavioral defenses, and the social psychological mechanisms through which cultures are evoked. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schaller, M., & Duncan, L. A. (2007). The behavioral immune system: Its evolution and social psychological implications. In J. P. Forgas, M. G. Haselton, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Evolution and the social mind (pp. 293–307). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. (2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture: Disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 212–221. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. (2010). Infectious diseases and the evolution of cross-cultural differences. In M. Schaller, A. Norenzayan, S. J. Heine, T. Yamagishi, & T. Kameda (Eds.), Evolution, culture, and the human mind (pp. 243–256). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  50. Schwartz, G. G., & Rosenblum, L. A. (1981). Allometry of primate hair density and the evolution of human hairlessness. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 55, 9–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Stringer, C. B. (1994). Evolution of early humans. In S. Jones, R. Martin, & D. Pilbeam (Eds.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of human evolution (pp. 241–254). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Thompson, K. J. P. (2010). Grooming the naked ape: Do perceptions of disease and aggression vulnerability influence grooming behaviour in humans? A comparative ethological perspective. Current Psychology, 29, 288–296. doi:10.1007/s12144-010-9089-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237–269. doi:10.1007/BF02692201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 103–122. doi:10.1037/a0015474.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pavol Prokop
    • 1
    • 2
  • Markus J. Rantala
    • 3
  • Muhammet Usak
    • 4
  • Ibrahim Senay
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of EducationTrnava UniversityTrnavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Institute of ZoologySlovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  4. 4.Faculty of EducationDumlupinar UniversityKutahyaTurkey
  5. 5.Department of Psychological CounselingZirve UniversityGaziantepTurkey

Personalised recommendations