Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Typological Approach to Testing the Evolutionary Functions of Human Female Orgasm

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Building on previous work that identified different types of orgasm in women (King, Belsky, Mah, & Binik, 2011), the goal of the present study was to extend such typological work and determine whether female orgasmic variability tracked potentially evolutionarily salient sexual partner characteristics (e.g., those displaying possible immune-system compatibility). A total of 265 females completed an Internet survey about their orgasmic experience—achieved either with partners or alone. For partnered orgasms, they also provided details of partner characteristics and sexual behaviors. Latent class analysis revealed two orgasm types which were meaningfully distinguishable in terms of sensations and location—either centered on the surface of genitalia or deep inside. Deep orgasms were associated with internal sensations consistent with proposed functions of female orgasm in terms of differential sperm insuck. Such orgasms were associated with partners who were perceived as considerate, dominant, with a noticeably attractive smell, and as providing firm penetration. However, some hypothesized reproductively significant partner characteristics were not differentially associated with deep orgasms (i.e., muscularity, aggression, masculinity). Results were discussed and future research directions outlined. In particular, it is suggested that sexual passion between partners is a non-accidental component of sexual functioning and that this has too frequently been missing in sex research involving humans. Direct physiological measures of the results of female orgasm need to be undertaken. Additionally, the intriguing phenomenon of female ejaculation deserves scientific attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Details of the questions asked in the pilot are available from the corresponding author.

  2. Tables paralleling the remaining (third) set of data, with comparison to the first and second sets of data, are available from the corresponding author.

  3. Data are available from the corresponding author.

References

  • Achille, L., & Wilkinson, C. (2001). Submission to the BBFC: Female ejaculation: Research contrary to BBFC ruling and replies. An open letter detailing objections to banning portrayals of female ejaculation on film. On behalf of Feminists against Censorship. Retrieved August 16, 2010 from http://www.fiawol.demon.co.uk/FAC/femejac.htm

  • Ammersbach, R. (1930). Sterilität und frigidität. Medizinische Wochenschrift, 77, 225–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H. M., & Dennerstein, L. (1994). Increased female sexual response after oxytocin. British Medical Journal, 309, 929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H. M., & Dennerstein, L. (1995). Oxytocin and female sexuality. Gynecological and Obstetric Investigation, 40, 217–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayinde, B. A., Onwukaeme, D. N., & Nworgu, Z. A. M. (2006). Oxytocic effects of the water extract of Musanga cecropioides R. Brown (Moraceae) stem bark. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 1350–1354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrke, M. S., Yesalis, C. E., & Wright, J. E. (1990). Psychological and behavioural effects of endogenous testosterone levels and anabolic-androgenic steroids among males: A review. Sports Medicine, 5, 303–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993a). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation. Animal Behaviour, 46, 861–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993b). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 46, 887–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barash, D. (2005). Let a thousand orgasms bloom! Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution by E. A. Lloyd. Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Peeler, W. H. (1979). Models of female orgasm. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 8, 405–423.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binik, Y. M. (2001). Sexuality and the internet: Lots of hyp(otheses): Only a little data. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 281–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. R. (2000). Promiscuity: An evolutionary history of sperm competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaicher, W., Gruber, D., Bieglmayer, C., Blaicher, A. M., Knogler, W., & Huber, J. C. (1999). The role of oxytocin in relation to female sexual arousal. Gynaecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 47, 125–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1992). Reproductive decisions. In E. A. Smith & B. Winterhalder (Eds.), Evolutionary ecology and human behavior (pp. 339–374). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine deGruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, S. (2007). Vaginal orgasm is associated with better psychological function. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22, 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate selection: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1998). Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: A contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, investment, parenting indicators, and commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, C. A. (1976). New data about female sexual response. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 2, 40–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, M. S., Warburton, V. L., Dixen, J., & Davidson, J. M. (1994). Relationships among cardio-vascular, muscular and oxytocin responses during human sexual activity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 59–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, R. M., & Brody, S. (2007). Women’s relationship quality is associated with specifically penile-vaginal intercourse orgasm and frequency. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 33, 319–327.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, H. (1991). The ant and the peacock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, H. (1992). Sexual selection: Historical perspectives. In E. F. Keller & E. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Keywords in evolutionary biology (pp. 286–293). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man (2nd ed.). London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawood, K., Kirk, K. M., Bailey, J. M., Andrews, P. W., & Martin, N. G. (2005). Genetic and environmental influences on the frequency of orgasm in women. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8, 27–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L. G., Perrett, D. I., Penton-Voak, I. S., et al. (2005a). Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner’s masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 273, 1355–1360.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2005b). Women’s attractiveness judgments of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 47, 379–383.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, R. L. (1949). Human sex anatomy. New York: Robert E. Krieger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (1985). Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (1996). Female control: Sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschler, L. (2004). The physiology of the female orgasm as a proximate mechanism. Sexualities, Evolution and Gender, 6, 171–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschler, L. (2005, June). Does the female orgasm inform reproductively strategic choices? Poster session presented at the meeting of the Human Behavior & Evolution Society, Austin, TX.

  • Evans, E. I. (1933). The transport of spermatozoa in the dog. American Journal of Physiology, 105, 287–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fieder, M., Huber, S., Bookstein, F. L., Iber, K., Schafer, K., Winckler, G., et al. (2005). Status and reproduction in humans: New evidence for the validity of evolutionary explanations on basis of a university sample. Ethology, 111, 940–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. (1973). The female orgasm. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139, 603–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. A. (1976). Some aspects and implications of coital physiology. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 2, 205–213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. A., & Fox, B. (1971). A comparative study of coital physiology, with special reference to the sexual climax. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 24, 319–336.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. A., Wolff, H. S., & Baker, J. A. (1970). Measurement of intra-vaginal and intra-uterine pressures during human coitus by radio-telemetry. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 22, 243–251.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C. (2004). How to conduct behavioral research over the Internet: A beginner’s guide to HTML and CGI/Perl. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., Fessler, D. M. T., & Haselton, M. G. (2005). Do representations of male muscularity differ in men’s and women’s magazines? Body Image, 2, 81–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1167–1183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Christensen, P. N. (2004). Women’s preferences for male behavioural displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15, 203–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women’s preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of Royal Society, Biological Science, 265, 927–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Adaptations to ovulation: Implications for sexual and social behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 312–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genell, S. (1939). Experimental investigations of the muscular functions of the vagina and the uterus in the rat. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 19, 113–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, P. (2007). Managing reproduction—critical control points in exceeding 30 pigs per sow per year. In Proceedings of the London swine conference, pp. 171–184.

  • Goldfoot, D. A., Westerborg-vanLoon, H., Groeneveld, W., & Slob, A. K. (1980). Behavioral and physiological evidence of sexual climax in the female stump-tailed macaque (Macaque arctoides). Science, 208, 1477–1479.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1987). Freudian slip. Natural History, 96, 14–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A. (1997). Principles of females’ perspectives in avian behavioral ecology. Journal of Avian Biology, 28, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafenberg, E. (1950). The role of the urethra in female orgasm. International Journal of Sexology, 3, 145–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiling, H., & Buss, D. (2006). Women’s sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, D. A. (1999). Role of the cervix in sexual response: Evidence for and against. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 42, 972–978.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1982). Pathogens as causes of genetic diversity in their host populations. In R. M. Anderson & R. M. May (Eds.), Population biology of infectious diseases (pp. 269–296). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D., & Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science, 218, 384–387.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, C. G., & Ball, J. (1931). On the almost instantaneous transport of spermatozoa through the cervix and uterus of the rat. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biological Medicine, 28, 312–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., & Miller, G. F. (2006). Women’s fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Human Nature, 17, 50–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havlicek, J., Saxton, T. K., Roberts, S. C., Jozifkova, E., Lhota, S., Valentova, J., et al. (2008). He sees, she smells? Male and female reports of sensory reliance in mate choice and non-mate choice contexts. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 565–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, S. (1976). The Hite report: A nationwide survey of female sexuality. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopcroft, R. L. (2006). Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 104–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (1981). The woman that never evolved. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (1986). Empathy, polyandry, and the myth of the coy female. In R. Bleier (Ed.), Feminist approaches to science (pp. 119–143). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insel, T. R. (2010). The challenge of translation in social neuroscience: A review of oxytocin, vasopressin, and affiliative behavior. Neuron, 65, 768–779.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, K. (1962). A comparison of the powers of two multivariate analysis of variance tests. Biometrica, 49, 455–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jozifkova, E., & Flegr, J. (2006). Dominance, submissivity (and homosexuality) in general population. Testing of evolutionary hypothesis of sadomasochism by internet-trap-method. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 27, 711–718.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jozifkova, E., & Konvicka, M. (2009). Sexual arousal by higher- and lower-ranking partner: Manifestation of a mating strategy? Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 3327–3334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judson, O. (2003). Dr Tatiana’s sex advice to all creation. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judson, O. (2005). Anticlimax. Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution by E. A. Lloyd. Nature, 436, 916–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. J., Belsky, J., Mah, K., & Binik, Y. (2011). Are there different types of female orgasm? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 865–875.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, R. V. (2010). Artificial insemination of swine: Improving reproductive efficiency of the breeding herd. Retrieved from http://www.livestocktrail.uiuc.edu/swinerepronet/publications/extension/Mannitoba.pdf

  • Komisaruk, B. R., & Sansone, G. (2003). Neural pathways mediating vaginal function: The vagus nerves and spinal cord oxytocin. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 241–250.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komisaruk, B. R., Whipple, B., Crawford, A., Liu, W. C., Kalnin, A., & Mosier, K. (2004). Brain activation during vaginocervical self-stimulation and orgasm in women with complete spinal cord injury: fMRI evidence of mediation by the vagus nerves. Brain Research, 1024, 77–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komisaruk, B. R., Whipple, B., Gerdes, C. A., Harkness, B., & Keyes, J. W. (1997). Brainstem responses to cervical self-stimulation: Preliminary PET-scan analysis. International Behavioral Neuroscience Society Annual Conference Abstract Book, 6, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosfield, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435, 673–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, R. H., & Carstens, H. P. (1939). Roentgen studies of the mechanism involved in sperm transportation in the female rabbit. American Journal of Physiology, 125, 571–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, T. H. C., Haake, P., Hartmann, U., Schedlowski, M., & Exton, M. (2002). Orgasm-induced prolactin secretion: Feedback control of sexual drive? Neuroscience and Behavioural Reviews, 26, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Läuter, J. (1978). Sample size requirements for T2 test of MANOVA (tables for one way classification). Biometrical Journal, 20, 389–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. (1981). The female orgasm-a current appraisal. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 25, 119–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. (1998). Sex and the human female reproductive tract-what really happens during and after coitus. International Journal of Impotence Research, 10(Suppl. 1), S14–S21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. (2001). Sexual desire and the deconstruction and reconstruction of the human female sexual response model of Masters and Johnson. In W. Everard, E. Laan, & S. Both (Eds.), Sexual appetite, desire and motivation: Energetics of the sexual system (pp. 63–93). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. (2002). The physiology of sexual arousal in the human female: A recreational and procreational synthesis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 405–411.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. (2004). An orgasm is…who defines what an orgasm is? Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 19, 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. L., & Wagner, G. (1985). Orgasm in women in the laboratory-quantitative studies on duration, intensity, latency, and vaginal blood flow. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 439–449.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levis, D. G. (2000). Effect of oxytocin at the time of insemination on reproductive performance: A review. Nebraska Swine Report. University of Nebraska, pp. 11–17. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/coopext_swine/114/

  • Lewontin, R. C. (1978). Adaptation. Scientific American, 239, 156–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot-Klein, H. (1984). Prisoners of ritual: An odyssey into female genital circumcision in Africa. New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mah, K., & Binik, Y. M. (2001). The nature of human orgasm: A critical review of major trends. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 823–856.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mah, K., & Binik, Y. M. (2002). Do all orgasms feel alike? Evaluating a two-dimensional model of the orgasm experience across gender and sexual context. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 104–113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maines, R. P. (1999). The technology of orgasm: Hysteria, the vibrator, and women’s sexual satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1965). The sexual response cycles of the human male and female: comparative anatomy and physiology. In F. A. Beach (Ed.), Sex and behavior (pp. 512–534). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. London: Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaughey, M., & French, C. (2001). Women’s sex-toy parties: Technology, orgasm, and commodification. Sexuality and Culture, 5, 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R. (1952). Forces observed during coitus in thoroughbreds. Australian Ethology Journal, 28, 127–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (1967). The naked ape. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, U., & Mazur, A. (2001). Evidence of unconstrained directional selection for male tallness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 302–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2001). Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Human Nature, 13, 473–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D., & Pollet, T. V. (2008). Natural selection on male wealth in humans. American Naturalist, 172, 658–666.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-research: Ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, H. E., Hutson, J. M., Anderson, C. R., & Plenter, R. J. (1998). Anatomical relationship between urethra and clitoris. Journal of Urology, 159, 1892–1897.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, H. E., Sanjeevan, K., & Hutson, J. M. (2005). Anatomy of the clitoris. Journal of Urology, 174, 1189–1195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, C. L. (1976). On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 579–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Lipowic, A. (2000). Evolutionary fitness: Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature, 403, 156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. D., & Whipple, B. (1981). Pelvic muscle strength of female ejaculators: Evidence in support of a new theory of orgasm. Journal of Sex Research, 17, 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, M. (2002). Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature, 371, 598–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, K. C. S., & Jayachandran, K. (1967). Power comparisons of tests of two multivariate hypotheses based on four criteria. Biometrica, 54, 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, T., & Nettle, D. (2009). Partner wealth predicts self-reported orgasm frequency in a sample of Chinese women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 146–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, H. G., & Katz, D. L. (1994). Psychiatric and medical effects of anabolic-androgenic steroid use: A controlled study of 160 athletes. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 375–382.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pound, N., & Daly, M. (2000). Functional significance of human female orgasm still hypothetical. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 620–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preference for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 388–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2006). Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution by E. A. Lloyd. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2007). Of bugs and boojums: Female orgasm as facultative adaptation [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 337–339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A., & Dawood, K. (2006). The evolution of female orgasm: Adaptation or byproduct? Twin Studies and Human Genetics, 9, 467–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancour-Laferriere, D. (1983). Four adaptive aspects of the female orgasm. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 6, 319–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertiello, R. C. (1970). The “clitoral vs. vaginal orgasm” controversy and some of its ramifications. Journal of Sex Research, 6, 307–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A., Leng, G., & J. Douglas, A. J. (2003). The magnocellular oxytocin system, the fount of maternity: Adaptations in pregnancy. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 24, 27–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schober, J. M., Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., & Ransley, P. G. (2004). Self-assessment of genital anatomy, sexual sensitivity and function in women: Implications for genitoplasty. British Journal of Urology, 94, 589–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, W. W., van Andel, P., Sabelis, I., & Mooyaart, E. (1999). Magnetic resonance imaging of male and female genitals during coitus and female sexual arousal. British Medical Journal, 319, 1596–1600.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I. M. L., Pound, N., Stephen, I. D., Clark, A. P., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2010). Does masculinity matter? The contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans. PLoS One, 5(10), e13585.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sear, R. (2006). Height and reproductive success: How a Gambian population compares to the West. Human Nature, 17, 405–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepperd, J. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1989). Attractiveness and height: The role of stature in dating preference, frequency of dating, and perceptions of attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 617–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J., & Singer, I. (1972). Types of female orgasm. Journal of Sex Research, 8, 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundahl, D. (2003). Female ejaculation and the G-spot. London: Hunter House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunder, M. (2006). Physical stature and intelligence as predictors of the timing of baby boomers’ very first date. Journal of Biosocial Science, 38, 821–833.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). The scent of symmetry: A human pheromone that signals fitness? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 175–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., & Comer, R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1601–1615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, R., Scheyd, G., McCollough, J., & Franklin, M. (2003). MHC, symmetry and body scent attractiveness in men and women (Homo sapiens). Behavioral Ecology, 14, 668–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods in ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toner, J. P., & Adler, N. T. (1986). Influence of mating and vaginocervical stimulation on rat uterine activity. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 78, 239–249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trapl, J. (1943). Neue Anschauungen über den Ei- und Samentransport in den inneren Geschlechtsteilen der Frau. Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie, 67, 547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troisi, A., & Carosi, M. (1998). Female orgasm rate increases with male dominance in Japanese macaques. Animal Behaviour, 56, 1261–1266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VanDemark, N. L., & Moeller, A. N. (1951). Speed of spermatozoan transport in the reproductive tract of the estrous cow. American Journal of Physiology, 165, 674–679.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind, C., Escher, S., Van deWaal, M., & Frei, E. (2007). The major histocompatibility complex and perfumers’ descriptions of human body odors. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 330–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind, C., & Penn, D. (2000). MHC genes, body odours, and odour preference. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 15, 1269–1271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F., & Paepke, A. J. (1995). MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 260, 245–249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M. J. (1992). Adaptation: Current uses. In E. F. Keller & E. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Keywords in evolutionary biology (pp. 13–18). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, B., Ogden, G., & Komisaruk, B. R. (1992). Physiological correlates of imagery induced orgasm in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21, 121–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wildt, L., Kissler, S., Licht, P., & Becker, W. (1998). Sperm transport in the human female genital tract and its modulation by oxytocin as assessed by hysterosalpingoscintigraphy, hysterotonography, electrohysterography and Doppler sonography. Human Reproduction Update, 4, 655–666.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zak, P. J., Kurzban, R., & Matzner, W. T. (2005). Oxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 522–527.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaviačič, M., Doležalová, S., Holomán, I. K., Zaviačičová, A., Mikulecký, M., & Brázdil, V. (1988). Concentrations of fructose in female ejaculate and urine: A comparative biochemical study. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zervomanolakis, I., Ott, H. W., Hadziomerovic, D., Mattle, V., Seeber, B. E., Virgolini, I., et al. (2007). Physiology of upward transport in the human female genital tract. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1101, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, K. (2002). From the Editor’s desk: Receiving the torch in the era of sexological renaissance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuk, M. (2002). Sexual selections: What we can and can’t learn about sex from animals. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuk, M. (2006). The case of the female orgasm [Review of the book: The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution by E. A. Lloyd]. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 49, 294–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for the Study of Children, Families and Social Issues, Birkbeck University of London, London, UK

    Robert King & Jay Belsky

  2. Department of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

    Robert King

Authors
  1. Robert King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jay Belsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert King.

Appendix

Appendix

Survey Questions and Possible Responses

  1. (1)

    Did you experience any internal sucking sensations? (1. None, 2. Weak, 3. Moderate, 4. Strong)

  2. (2)

    How clear was your thinking after orgasm? (1. Total loss of clarity, 2. Clear thought as normally experienced, 3. Clearer-than-normal thinking)

  3. (3)

    How relaxed did you feel following orgasm? (1.Very relaxed, 2. Somewhat relaxed, 3. Somewhat excited, 4.Very excited)

  4. (4)

    How relaxed did you feel prior to orgasm? (1.Very relaxed, 2. Somewhat relaxed, 3. Somewhat anxious, 4.Very anxious)

  5. (5)

    How localised was your orgasm? (1. Very localized, 2. Somewhat localized, 3. Whole body involved)

  6. (6)

    How noisy were you during orgasm? (1. Not/silent, 2. Somewhat noisy, 3. Very noisy)

  7. (7)

    Where was the orgasm centered? (On the surface of the genitals vs. Deep inside)

  8. (8)

    Did you experience any floating sensations following orgasm? (Yes/No)

  9. (9)

    Did you experience any apnoea (catching of breath) (Yes/No)

  10. (10)

    Did you experience any sense of loss of self following orgasm? (Yes/No)

  11. (11)

    Did you ejaculate during orgasm? (Yes/No)

  12. (12)

    Did you experience a sensation akin to a desire to urinate prior to orgasm? (Yes/No)

  13. (13)

    How long from the start of sexual intimacy did it take for orgasm to occur? (1. A few minutes, 2. More than a few minutes but less than 10, 3. More than 10 min but less than half an hour, 4. More than 30 but less than 60 min, 5. An hour or more)

Partner questions:

  1. (1)

    How aggressive was your partner’s behavior during sex? (1. Very tender, 2. Somewhat tender, 3. Somewhat aggressive, 4. Very aggressive)

  2. (2)

    How considerate was your partner’s behavior during sex? (1. Very selfish, 2. Somewhat selfish, 3. Somewhat considerate, 4. Very considerate)

  3. (3)

    How muscular was your sexual partner? (1. Not at all, 2. Not very muscular, 3. Somewhat muscular, 4. Very muscular)

  4. (4)

    How masculine would you describe your partner as being? (1. Very feminine, 2. Somewhat feminine, 3. Somewhat masculine, 4. Very masculine)

  5. (5)

    5) How attractive was your sexual partner’s smell? (1. Unattractive, 2. Neither attractive nor unattractive, 3. Attractive)

  6. (6)

    How dominant was your partner’s behavior during sex? (1.Very submissive, 2.Somewhat submissive, 3. Neither dominant nor submissive, 4. Somewhat dominant, 5. Very dominant)

  7. (7)

    How vigorous was penetration during intercourse—if any? (1.Very gentle, 2. Fairly gentle, 3.Fairly vigorous, 4.Very vigorous)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, R., Belsky, J. A Typological Approach to Testing the Evolutionary Functions of Human Female Orgasm. Arch Sex Behav 41, 1145–1160 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0001-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0001-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation