Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Debate About Paraphilic Coercive Disorder is Mostly Ideological and Going Nowhere

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blanchard, R. (2011). A brief history of field trials of the DSM diagnostic criteria for paraphilias. [Letter-to-the-Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 861–862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brotto, L. A. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for Sexual Aversion Disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 271–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. (2010). Paraphilic coercive disorder in the DSM: The right diagnosis for the right reasons. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1443–1447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. (2011). Wollert (2011) demonstrates again how ideology taints scientific debate. [Letter-to-the-Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1099–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollert, R. (2011). Paraphilic Coercive Disorder does not belong in DSM-5 for statistical, historical, conceptual, and practical reasons [Letter-to-the-Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1097–1098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author is an Advisor to the DSM-5 Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders Work Group. The opinions expressed in this Letter are solely the opinions of the author and not of any organization or institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences and Department of Anesthesiology, Wayne State University, UPC-Jefferson, 2751 E. Jefferson, #200, Detroit, MI, 48207, USA

    Richard Balon

Authors
  1. Richard Balon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Balon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balon, R. The Debate About Paraphilic Coercive Disorder is Mostly Ideological and Going Nowhere. Arch Sex Behav 41, 535–536 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9892-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9892-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation