Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Sex-Related Differences in Auditory and Visual Sensory Functioning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was designed to elucidate sex-related differences in two basic auditory and one basic visual aspect of sensory functioning, namely sensory discrimination of pitch, loudness, and brightness. Although these three aspects of sensory functioning are of vital importance in everyday life, little is known about whether men and women differ from each other in these sensory functions. Participants were 100 male and 100 female volunteers ranging in age from 18 to 30 years. Since sensory sensitivity may be positively related to individual levels of intelligence and musical experience, measures of psychometric intelligence and musical background were also obtained. Reliably better performance for men compared to women was found for pitch and loudness, but not for brightness discrimination. Furthermore, performance on loudness discrimination was positively related to psychometric intelligence, while pitch discrimination was positively related to both psychometric intelligence and levels of musical training. Additional regression analyses revealed that each of three predictor variables (sex, psychometric intelligence, and musical training) accounted for a statistically significant portion of unique variance in pitch discrimination. With regard to loudness discrimination, regression analysis yielded a statistically significant portion of unique variance for sex as a predictor variable, whereas psychometric intelligence just failed to reach statistical significance. The potential influence of sex hormones on sex-related differences in sensory functions is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acton, G. S., & Schroeder, D. H. (2001). Sensory discrimination as related to general intelligence. Intelligence, 29, 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, A. P., & Breedlove, S. M. (1985). Organizational and activational effects of sex steroids on brain and behavior: A reanalysis. Hormones and Behavior, 19, 469–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. A. (1987). Sensory functioning. In M. A. Baker (Ed.), Sex differences in human performance (pp. 5–36). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucik, V., & Neubauer, A. C. (1996). Bimodality in the Berlin model of intelligence structure (BIS): A replication study. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 987–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, C. (1909–1910). Experimental tests of general intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 94–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corso, J. F. (1959). Age and sex differences in thresholds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31, 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J. (1994). Sensory discrimination and intelligence: Postmortem or resurrection? American Journal of Psychology, 107, 95–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J., Bell, P. J., Bell, A. J., Campbell, M. L., & Fazal, N. D. (2004). Sensory discrimination and intelligence: Testing Spearman’s other hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dreisbach, L. E., Kramer, S. J., Cobos, S., & Cowart, K. (2007). Racial and gender effects on pure-tone thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in normal-hearing young adults. International Journal of Audiology, 46, 419–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L., Hershberger, S., Field, E., Wersinger, S., Pellis, S., Geary, D., … Karadi, K. (2008). Sex differences: Summarizing more than a century of scientific research. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. A. (1894). Researches on the mental and physical development of school-children. Studies from the Yale Psychological Laboratory, 2, 40–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, M. (2009). Gonadal hormones and sexual differentiation of human brain and behavior. In D. Pfaff, A. P. Arnold, A. M. Etgen, S. E. Fahrbach, & R. T. Rubin (Eds.), Hormones, brain and behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 1869–1909). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, A. O. (1984). Intelligenzstrukturforschung: Konkurrierende Modelle, neue Entwicklungen, Perspektiven [Research in the structure of intelligence: Competing models, new developments, perspectives]. Psychologische Rundschau, 35, 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, A. O., Süß, H.-M., & Beauducel, A. (1997). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur test form 4. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (1982). Race, social class and ability patterns on the WISC-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaernbach, C. (1991). Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 227–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, T. L. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to interaural disparities of time and level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(Suppl. 1), 3256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D., & Galanter, E. (1963). Discrimination. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191–243). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1998). Sex differences in the auditory system. Developmental Neuropsychology, 14, 261–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (2002). Masculinization effects in the auditory system. Hearing Research, 252, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (2009). Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, D. (1972). Hearing: Individual differences in perceiving. Perception, 1, 465–473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle, V. B. (1975). The view from within: Pathways to the study of perception. Johns Hopkins Medical Journal, 136, 109–131.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nahum, M., Daikhin, L., Lubin, Y., Cohen, Y., & Ahissar, M. (2010). From comparison to classification: A cortical tool for boosting perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 1128–1136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, D. L., Kessler, C. J., & Dethlefs, T. M. (1996). Sex differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency maskers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2547–2550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raz, N., Moberg, P. J., & Millman, D. (1990). Effects of age and age-related differences in auditory information processing on fluid and crystallized intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1147–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raz, N., Willerman, L., & Yama, M. (1987). On sense and senses: Intelligence and auditory information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, L. (2010). Sex differences in hearing. Implications for best practice in the classroom. Advances in Gender and Education, 2, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, K. M., Molenda-Figueira, H. A., & Sisk, C. L. (2009). Back to the future: The organizational-activational hypothesis adapted to puberty and adolescence. Hormones and Behavior, 55, 597–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, K., & Koch, W. (2003). Perceptual processes and cognitive ability. Intelligence, 31, 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seashore, C. E. (1899). Some psychological statistics. In G. T. Patrick (Ed.), The University of Iowa studies in psychology (pp. 1–84). Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seashore, C. E. (1919). The psychology of musical talent. Boston, MA: Silver, Burdett and Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shuter, R. (1968). Psychology of music. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence”, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Süß, H.-M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working- memory capacity explains reasoning ability—and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troche, S. J., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2009). Temporal and non-temporal sensory discrimination and their predictions of capacity- and speed-related aspects of psychometric intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velle, W. (1987). Sex differences in sensory functions. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 30, 490–522.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Muesmattstrasse 45, 3000, Bern 9, Switzerland

    Thomas H. Rammsayer & Stefan J. Troche

Authors
  1. Thomas H. Rammsayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan J. Troche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas H. Rammsayer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rammsayer, T.H., Troche, S.J. On Sex-Related Differences in Auditory and Visual Sensory Functioning. Arch Sex Behav 41, 583–590 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9880-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9880-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation