Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 557–570 | Cite as

Confidence Mediates the Sex Difference in Mental Rotation Performance

  • Zachary EstesEmail author
  • Sydney Felker
Original Paper


On tasks that require the mental rotation of 3-dimensional figures, males typically exhibit higher accuracy than females. Using the most common measure of mental rotation (i.e., the Mental Rotations Test), we investigated whether individual variability in confidence mediates this sex difference in mental rotation performance. In each of four experiments, the sex difference was reliably elicited and eliminated by controlling or manipulating participants’ confidence. Specifically, confidence predicted performance within and between sexes (Experiment 1), rendering confidence irrelevant to the task reliably eliminated the sex difference in performance (Experiments 2 and 3), and manipulating confidence significantly affected performance (Experiment 4). Thus, confidence mediates the sex difference in mental rotation performance and hence the sex difference appears to be a difference of performance rather than ability. Results are discussed in relation to other potential mediators and mechanisms, such as gender roles, sex stereotypes, spatial experience, rotation strategies, working memory, and spatial attention.


Confidence Gender roles Mental rotation Sex differences Spatial abilities Stereotype threat and lift 


  1. Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1995). Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baranski, J. V., & Petrusic, W. M. (1998). Probing the locus of confidence judgments: Experiments on the time to determine confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 929–945.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beilock, S. L., Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 256–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bethel-Fox, C. E., & Shepard, R. N. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beyer, S., & Bowden, E. M. (1997). Gender differences in self-perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanton, H., Christie, C., & Dye, M. (2002). Social identity versus reference frame comparisons: The moderating role of stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Rosabianca, A., & Kiesner, J. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking. Psychological Science, 16, 572–578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Casey, M. B. (1996). Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Review, 16, 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (1997). Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. Developmental Psychology, 33, 669–680.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cochran, K. F., & Wheatley, G. H. (1989). Ability and sex-related differences in cognitive strategies on spatial tasks. Journal of General Psychology, 116, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collaer, M. L., & Hines, M. (1995). Human behavioral sex differences: A role for gonadal hormones during early development? Psychological Bulletin, 118, 55–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooke-Simpson, A., & Voyer, D. (2007). Confidence and gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Estes, Z. (2004). Confidence and gradedness in semantic categorization: Definitely somewhat artifactual, maybe absolutely natural. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1041–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18, 850–855.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geiser, C., Lehmann, W., & Eid, M. (2006). Separating “rotators” from “nonrotators” in the Mental Rotations Test: A multigroup latent class analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 261–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., & Williams, K. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 659–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Halari, R., Hines, M., Kumari, V., Mehrotra, R., Wheeler, M., Ng, V., et al. (2005). Sex differences and individual differences in cognitive performance and their relationship to endogenous gonadal hormones and gonadotropins. Behavioral Neuroscience, 119, 104–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halpern, D. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Heil, M., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2008). Sex differences in mental rotation with polygons of different complexity: Do men utilize holistic processes whereas women prefer piecemeal ones? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 683–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hines, M. (2004). Brain gender. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hines, M., Fane, B. A., Pasterski, V. L., Mathews, G. A., Conway, G. S., & Brook, C. (2003). Spatial abilities following prenatal androgen abnormality: Targeting and mental rotations performance in individuals with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 28, 1010–1026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jamieson, J. P., Mendes, W. B., Blackstock, E., & Schmader, T. (2010). Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: Reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 208–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johns, M., Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2008). Streotype threat and executive resource depletion: Examining the influence of emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 691–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle—Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance. Psychological Science, 16, 175–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kail, R., Carter, P., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1979). The locus of sex differences in spatial ability. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 182–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kail, R., & Park, Y. (1990). Impact of practice on speed of mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 227–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Levine, S. C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S. F., Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2005). Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychological Science, 16, 841–845.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of gender differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lippa, R. A., Collaer, M. L., & Peters, M. (2010). Sex differences in mental rotation and line angle judgments are positively associated with gender equality and economic development across 53 nations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 990–997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lizarraga, M. L. S., & Ganuza, J. M. G. (2003). Improvement of mental rotation in girls and boys. Sex Roles, 49, 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lohman, D. F. (1986). The effect of speed-accuracy tradeoff on sex differences in mental rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lohman, D. F., & Nichols, P. D. (1990). Training spatial abilities: Effects of practice on rotation and synthesis tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maass, A., & Cadinu, M. (2003). Stereotype threat: When minority members underperform. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 243–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Martens, A., Johns, M., Greenberg, J., & Schimel, J. (2006). Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self-affirmation on women’s intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Massa, L. J., Mayer, R. E., & Bohon, L. M. (2005). Individual differences in gender role beliefs influence spatial ability test performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Masters, M. S. (1998). The gender difference on the Mental Rotations Test is not due to performance factors. Memory & Cognition, 26, 444–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maylor, E. A., Reimers, S., Choi, J., Collaer, M. L., Peters, M., & Silverman, I. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in cognition across adulthood: Age is kinder to women than to men regardless of sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 235–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McGlone, M. S., & Aronson, J. (2006). Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 486–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moe, A., Meneghetti, C., & Cadinu, M. (2009). Women and mental rotation: Incremental theory and spatial strategy use enhance performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moe, A., & Pazzaglia, F. (2006). Following the instructions! Effects of gender beliefs in mental rotation. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Newcombe, N., Bandura, M. M., & Taylor, D. G. (1983). Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 9, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ortner, T. M., & Sieverding, M. (2008). Where are the gender differences? Male priming boosts spatial skills in women. Sex Roles, 59, 274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pallier, G. (2003). Gender differences in the self-assessment of accuracy on cognitive tasks. Sex Roles, 48, 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pasterski, V., Zwierzynska, K., & Estes, Z. (2011). Sex differences in semantic categorization. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1183–1187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peters, M. (2005). Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems. Brain and Cognition, 57, 176–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R., & Richardson, C. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28, 39–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peters, M., Manning, J. T., & Reimers, S. (2007). The effects of sex, sexual orientation, and digit ratio (2D:4D) on mental rotation performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 251–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Petrusic, W. M., & Baranski, J. V. (2003). Judging confidence influences decision processing in comparative judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Quaiser-Pohl, C., Geiser, C., & Lehmann, W. (2006). The relationship between computer-game preference, gender, and mental-rotation ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 609–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rahman, Q., Wilson, G. D., & Abrahams, S. (2004). Biosocial factors, sexual orientation and neurocognitive functioning. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 867–881.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Regner, I., Smeding, A., Gimmig, D., Thinus-Blanc, C., Monteil, J.-M., & Huguet, P. (2010). Individual differences in working memory moderate stereotype threat effects. Psychological Science, 21, 1646–1648.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Resnick, S. M. (1993). Sex differences in mental rotations: An effect of time limits? Brain and Cognition, 21, 71–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 949–996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Saucier, D. M., McCreary, D. R., & Saxberg, J. K. J. (2002). Does gender role socialization mediate sex difference in mental rotations? Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1101–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scali, R. M., Brownlow, S., & Hicks, J. L. (2000). Gender differences in spatial task performance as a function of speed or accuracy orientation. Sex Roles, 43, 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schmader, T., Forbes, C. E., Zhang, S., & Mendes, W. B. (2009). A metacognitive perspective on the cognitive deficits experienced in intellectually threatening environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 584–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schultz, K. (1991). The contribution of solution strategy to spatial performance. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 474–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shih, M., Ambady, N., Richeson, J. A., Fujita, K., & Gray, H. M. (2002). Stereotype performance boosts: The impact of self-relevance and the manner of stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 638–647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Signorella, M. L., Jamison, W., & Krupa, M. H. (1989). Predicting spatial performance from gender stereotyping in activity preferences and in self-concept. Developmental Psychology, 25, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sims, V. K., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Domain specificity of spatial expertise: The case of video game players. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Smith, W., & Dror, I. E. (2001). The role of meaning and familiarity in mental transformations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 732–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stericker, A., & LeVesconte, S. (1982). Effect of brief training on sex-related differences in visual-spatial skill. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1018–1029.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Terlecki, M. S., & Newcombe, N. S. (2005). How important is the digital divide? The relation of computer and videogame usage to gender differences in mental rotation ability. Sex Roles, 53, 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G. (1949). Manual for the SRA primary mental abilities. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
  78. Tomasino, B., & Rumiati, R. I. (2004). Effects of strategies on mental rotation and hemispheric lateralization: Neuropsychological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 878–888.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotation, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Voyer, D., Nolan, C., & Voyer, S. (2000). The relation between experience and spatial performance in men and women. Sex Roles, 43, 891–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Voyer, D., Rodgers, M. A., & McCormick, P. A. (2004). Timing conditions and the magnitude of gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test. Memory & Cognition, 32, 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Voyer, D., & Saunders, K. A. (2004). Gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test: A factor analysis. Acta Psychologica, 117, 79–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Witkin, H. A., & Asch, S. E. (1948). Studies in space orientation. IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 762–782.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wraga, M., Duncan, L., Jacobs, E. C., Helt, M., & Church, J. (2006). Stereotype susceptibility narrows the gender gap in imagined self-rotation performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 813–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MarketingBocconi UniversityMilanItaly
  2. 2.Counseling and Psychiatric ServicesUniversity of Georgia Health CenterAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations