Abstract
Distinctions are commonly made regarding preferences for insertive or receptive anal intercourse within the gay male community. Three sexual self-labels are typically specified: “top,” meaning a man who prefers the insertive position, “bottom,” meaning a man who prefers the receptive position, and “versatile,” meaning a man willing to perform either position. The aim of this study was to examine personality differences among these three groups in gay men in China. We sampled 220 Internet-obtained Chinese gay men on instrumentality, expressiveness, gender-related interests, self-ascribed masculinity- femininity (Self-MF), and Big Five personality traits. Significant differences were found among sexual self-label groups in sexual behavior and in gendered traits and interests. Tops scored higher than the bottoms on instrumentality, gender-related interests, and self-ascribed masculinity-femininity (Self-MF) and bottoms scored higher than tops on expressiveness. Versatiles’ scores in gender-related traits were intermediate between that of tops and bottoms. There were no significant differences in Big Five traits among the three groups. Sexual self-labels appear not only to distinguish sexual behavior patterns but may also suggest gender role differences among Chinese gay men.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
Bowleg, L. (2004). Love, sex, and masculinity in sociocultural context: HIV concerns and condom use among African American men in heterosexual relationships. Men and Masculinities, 72, 166–186.
Carrier, J. M. (1985). Mexican male bisexuality. In F. Klein & T. Wolf (Eds.), Bisexualities: Theory and research (pp. 75–86). New York: Haworth Press.
Carrier, J. M. (1989). Sexual behavior and spread of AIDS in Mexico. Medical Anthropology, 10, 129–142.
Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality across cultures: Robust and surprising results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.
Crawford, I., & Solliday, E. (1996). The attitudes of undergraduate college students towards gay parenting. Journal of Homosexuality, 30, 63–77.
Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several Five-Factor models. In I. Marveled, I. J. Deary, F. de Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
Han, C. (2008). A qualitative exploration of the relationship between racism and unsafe sex among Asian Pacific Islander gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 827–837.
Hart, T. A., Wolitski, R. J., Purcell, D. W., Gómez, C., Halkitis, P., & The Seropositive Urban Men’s Study Team. (2003). Sexual behavior among HIV-positive men who have sex with men: What’s in a label? Journal of Sex Research, 40, 179–188.
He, J. G., Dou, Z. D., & Wu, Z. S. (2006). Risk sexual behaviors among MSM in Wuhu and surrounding areas. Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine, 112, 353–355.
Kelley, J. (2001). Attitudes towards homosexuality in 29 nations. Australian Social Monitor, 4, 15–22.
Li, Y. H. (1998). Homosexual subculture [in Chinese]. Beijing: Modern China Press.
Lippa, R. A. (1998). Gender-related individual difference and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the “people-things” dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996–1009.
Lippa, R. A. (2005a). Gender, nature and nurture (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lippa, R. A. (2005b). Sexual orientation and personality. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16, 119–153.
Lippa, R. A. (2005c). How do lay people weight information about instrumentality, expressiveness, and gender-typed hobbies when judging masculinity–femininity in themselves, best friends, and strangers? Sex Roles, 53, 43–55.
Lippa, R. A. (2008). Sex differences and sexual orientation differences in personality: Findings from the BBC internet survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 173–187.
Lippa, R. A. (2010a). Sex differences in personality traits and gender-related occupational preferences across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social-environmental theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 619–636.
Lippa, R. A. (2010b). Gender differences in personality and interests: When, where, and why? Social Psychology and Personality Compass, 4, 1098–1110.
Magana, J. R., & Carrier, J. M. (1991). Mexican and Mexican American male sexual behavior and spread of AIDS in California. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 425–441.
Moskowitz, D. A., Rieger, G., & Roloff, M. E. (2008). Tops, bottoms, and versatiles. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 23, 191–202.
Ou, Y. L., Ding, X. B., Zhou, C., & Lu, R. R. (2008). HIV risk sexual behavior among MSM with different sexual orientation in Chongqing. South China Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34, 16–23.
Prediger, D. J. (1982). Dimensions underlying Holland’s hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 259–287.
Sanderson, T. (1994). A–Z of gay sex. London: Other Way Press.
Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168–182.
Storms, M. D. (1979). Sex role identity and its relationship to sex role attributions and sex role stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1779–1789.
Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 855–884.
Tao, X. Y., Cai, W. D., Cai, Y. M., Wei, A. Y., Huang, G. W., & Song, D. (2004). Survey of related high risk sexual behavior of MSM in Shenzhen city [in Chinese]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 31, 247–248.
Tracey, T. J., & Rounds, J. (1993). Evaluating Holland’s and Gati’s vocational interest models: A structural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 229–246.
Wegesin, D., & Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L. (2000). Top/bottom self-label, anal sex practices, HIV risk and gender role identity in gay men in New York City. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 12, 43–62.
Wei, C., & Raymond, H. F. (2011). Preference for and maintenance of anal sex roles among men who have sex with men: Sociodemographic and behavioral correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 829–834.
Weinrich, J. D., Grant, I., Jacobson, D. L., Robinson, S. R., McCutchan, J. A., & The HNRC Group. (1992). Effects of recalled childhood gender nonconformity on adult genitoerotic role and AIDS exposure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21, 559–585.
Whitehead, T. L. (1997). Urban low-income African American men, HIV/AIDS, and gender identity. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 11, 411–447.
Xu, Y., Shi, W. X., & Hu, S. H. (2005). Investigation of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome correlated with high risk sexual behavior and knowledge of male homosexuality in Hangzhou Province, China [in Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39, 37–39.
Yang, A. (1997). The polls—trends: Attitudes toward homosexuality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 477–507.
Yu, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2007). Study on quality of life of male homosexuals in Shandong [in Chinese]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 34, 3932–3938.
Zheng, L., Goldberg, L. R., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Y., Tang, Y., & Liu, L. (2008). Reliability and concurrent validation of the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in China: Consistencies in factor structure between Internet-obtained heterosexual and homosexual samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 649–654.
Zheng, L., Lippa, R. A., & Zheng, Y. (2011). Sex and sexual orientation differences in personality in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 533–541.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Key Discipline Fund of National 211 Project (NSKD11010), China. This research is also supported by Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Fund (05JAXLX010), Ministry of Education, China. Dr. Hart is supported by a New Investigator Salary Award in HIV Research from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, L., Hart, T.A. & Zheng, Y. The Relationship Between Intercourse Preference Positions and Personality Traits Among Gay Men in China. Arch Sex Behav 41, 683–689 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9819-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9819-0