Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 483–485 | Cite as

Yet Another Paraphilia Definition Fails

  • Charles Moser
Letter to the Editor

Historically, it has been difficult to define paraphilias in a consistent manner or distinguish paraphilias from non-paraphilic or normophilic sexual interests (see Blanchard, 2009a; Moser & Kleinplatz, 2005). As part of the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) process of revising the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), Blanchard (2010a), the chair of the DSM-5 Paraphilias subworkgroup (PSWG), has proposed a new paraphilia definition: “A paraphilia is any powerful and persistent sexual interest other than sexual interest in copulatory or precopulatory behavior with phenotypically normal, consenting adult human partners” (p. 367).1 Blanchard (2009a) acknowledges that his paraphilia “definition is not watertight” and it already has attracted serious criticism (see Haeberle, 2010; Hinderliter, 2010; Singy, 2010). The current analysis will critique three components of Blanchard’s proposed definition (sexual interest in copulatory or precopulatory behavior,...

Keywords

Sexual Interest Pedophilia Fetishism Paraphilic Disorder Sexual Sadism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Bivona, J., & Critelli, J. (2009). The nature of women’s rape fantasies: An analysis of prevalence, frequency, and contents. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 33–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard, R. (2009a, October). DSM-V options: Paraphilias and paraphilic disorders, pedohebephilic disorder, and transvestic disorder. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Dallas, TX. Retrieved from http://individual.utoronto.ca/ray_blanchard/index_files/ATSA_DSM.html.
  4. Blanchard, R. (2009b, June). Paraphilias and the DSM-V: General diagnostic issues and options exemplified with pedohebephilic disorder. Paper presented at WAS World Congress for Sexual Health, Göteborg, Sweden. Retrieved from http://individual.utoronto.ca/ray_blanchard/index_files/WAS_DSM.html.
  5. Blanchard, R. (2010a). The DSM diagnostic criteria for transvestic fetishism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 363–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchard, R. (2010b). The DSM diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 304–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., & Dickey, R. (2009). Absolute versus relative ascertainment of pedophilia in men. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Critelli, J. W., & Bivona, J. M. (2008). Women’s erotic rape fantasies: An evaluation of theory and research. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 57–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haeberle, E. J. (2010). “Paraphilia”A prescientific concept: Some comments on a current debate. Retrieved from http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/BIB/paraphiliapre.htm.
  10. Hinderliter, A. C. (2010). Defining paraphilia: Excluding exclusion. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 241–272.Google Scholar
  11. Moser, C., & Kleinplatz, P. J. (2005). Does heterosexuality belong in the DSM? Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review, 6, 261–267.Google Scholar
  12. Singy, P. (2010). What’s wrong with sex? [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1231–1233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sexual MedicineInstitute for Advanced Study of Human SexualitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations