Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 741–753 | Cite as

Sexual Satisfaction and Relationship Happiness in Midlife and Older Couples in Five Countries

  • Julia R. Heiman
  • J. Scott Long
  • Shawna N. Smith
  • William A. Fisher
  • Michael S. Sand
  • Raymond C. Rosen
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Sexuality research focuses almost exclusively on individuals rather than couples, though ongoing relationships are very important for most people and cultures. The present study was the first to examine sexual and relationship parameters of middle-aged and older couples in committed relationships of 1–51 years duration. Survey research was conducted in Brazil, Germany, Japan, Spain, and the U.S. targeting 200 men aged 40–70 and their female partners in each country, with 1,009 couples in the final sample. Key demographic, health, physical intimacy, sexual behavior, sexual function, and sexual history variables were used to model relationship happiness and sexual satisfaction. The median ages were 55 for men and 52 for women; median relationship duration was 25 years. Relationship satisfaction in men depended on health, physical intimacy, and sexual functioning, while in women only sexual functioning predicted relationship satisfaction. Models predicting sexual satisfaction included significant physical intimacy and sexual functioning for both genders and, for men, more frequent recent sexual activity and fewer lifetime partners. Longer relationship duration predicted greater relationship happiness and sexual satisfaction for men. However, women in relationships of 20 to 40 years were significantly less likely than men to report relationship happiness. Compared to men, women showed lower sexual satisfaction early in the relationship and greater sexual satisfaction later. Within the long-term committed relationship context, there were significant gender differences in correlates of sexual and relationship satisfaction, with sexual functioning a common predictor of both types of satisfaction and physical intimacy a more consistent and salient predictor for men.

Keywords

Couples Midlife Sexual satisfaction Relationship happiness Sexual function Physical intimacy 

References

  1. Andersson, G., & Philipov, D. (2001). Life-table representations of family dynamics in 16 FFS countries (MPIDR Working Paper Series WP 2001-024). Rostock, Germany: Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research.Google Scholar
  2. Benevolo, M., Mottolese, M., Marandino, F., Carosi, M., Diodoro, M. G., Sentinelli, S., … Vocaturo, A. (2008). HPV prevalence among healthy Italian male sexual partners of women with cervical HPV infection. Journal of Medical Virology, 80, 1275–1281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fisher, W. A., Rosen, R. C., Eardley, I., Sand, M., & Goldstein, I. (2005). Sexual experience of female partners of men with erectile dysfunction: The Female Experience of Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (FEMALES) study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2, 675–684.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fisher, W. A., Rosen, R. C., Mollen, M., Brock, G., Karlin, G., Pommerville, P., … Sand, M. (2005). Improving the sexual quality of life of couples affected by erectile dysfunction: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of vardenafil. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2, 699–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hassebrauk, M., & Fehr, B. (2002). Dimensions of relationship quality. Personal Relationships, 9, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heiman, J. R., Talley, D. R., Bailen, J. L., Rosenberg, S. J., Pace, C. R., & Bavendam, T. (2007). Sexual function and satisfaction in heterosexual couples when men are administered sildenafil citrate (Viagra) for erectile dysfunction: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114, 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., Kang, J.-H., Wang, T., Levinson, B., Nicolosi, A., … Gingell, C. (2006). A cross-national study of subjective sexual well-being among older women and men: Findings from the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 145–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu, C. (2003). Does quality of marital sex decline with duration? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 55–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2005). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  12. Peterson, B. D., Pirritano, M., Christensen, U., & Schmidt, L. (2008). The impact of partner coping in couples experiencing infertility. Human Reproduction, 23, 1128–1137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Raymo, J. M., Iwasawa, M., & Bumpass, L. (2004). Marital dissolution in Japan: Recent trends and patterns. Demographic Research, 11, 395–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Remien, R. H., Stirratt, M. J., Dolezal, C., Dognin, J. S., Wagner, G. J., Carballo-Dieguez, A., … Jung, T. M. (2005). Couple-focused support to improve HIV medication adherence: A randomized controlled trial. AIDS, 19, 807–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosen, R., Brown, C., Heiman, J., Leiblum, S., Meston, C., Shabsigh, R., … D’Agostino, R. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosen, R., Fisher, W., Eardley, I., Niederberger, C., Nadel, A., & Sand, M. (2004). The Multinational Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) Study. I. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction and related health concerns in the general population. Current Medical Research Opinion, 20, 607–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosen, R. C., Riley, A., Wagner, G., Osterloh, I. H., Kirkpatrick, J., & Mishra, A. (1997). The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology, 49, 822–830.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith, K. B., Pukall, C. F., Tripp, D. A., & Nickel, J. C. (2007). Sexual and relationship functioning in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome and their partners. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 301–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Spanier, G. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage Family, 38, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sprecher, S. (2002). Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 190–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sprecher, S., & Cate, R. (2004). Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability. In J. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 235–256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Turner, A. N., Morrison, C. S., Padian, N. S., Kaufman, J. S., Behets, F. M., Salta, R. A., … Miller, W. C. (2008). Male circumcision and women’s risk of incident chlamydial, gonococcal, and trichomonal infections. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 35, 689–695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: 2001. Current Population Reports, P70-97. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  24. Yeh, H. C., Lorenz, F. O., Wickrama, K. A., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (2006). Relationships among sexual satisfaction, marital quality, and marital instability in midlife. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 339–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia R. Heiman
    • 1
  • J. Scott Long
    • 1
  • Shawna N. Smith
    • 1
  • William A. Fisher
    • 2
  • Michael S. Sand
    • 3
  • Raymond C. Rosen
    • 3
  1. 1.The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and ReproductionIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  3. 3.New England Research InstitutesWatertownUSA

Personalised recommendations