Sexual selection via mate choice may have influenced the evolution of women’s breast morphology. We conducted an image-based questionnaire quantifying and comparing the preferences of men from Papua New Guinea (PNG), Samoa, and New Zealand (NZ) for images of women’s breast size, breast symmetry, areola size, and areolar pigmentation. Results showed that men from PNG preferred larger breasts to a greater extent than men from Samoa and NZ, providing some support for the hypothesis that men from subsistence living cultures have a greater preference for morphological cues indicative of caloric reserves. Symmetrical breasts were most attractive to men in each culture. However, preferences were highest among NZ men, followed by men from Samoa, and were lowest among men from PNG. These results did not support the hypothesis that people living in higher pathogen environments have a greater preference for traits indicative of pathogen resistance and developmental stability. Large areolae were preferred among men from PNG, and to a lesser extent in Samoa, while in NZ men preferred medium-sized areolae. Thus, men’s preferences for women’s areolar size appear to be highly culturally specific. Darkly pigmented areolae were most attractive to men from Samoa and PNG, whereas men from NZ preferred areolae with medium pigmentation. These findings suggest that areolar pigmentation indicative of sexual maturity is preferred by men rather than lighter pigmentation, which may signal that a woman is in the early years of reproductive maturity. This study highlights the importance of cross-cultural research when testing the role of morphological cues in mate choice.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anderson, A. (1983). The reproductive role of the human breast. Current Anthropology, 24, 25–45.
Anderson, J. L. (1988). Breasts, hips and buttocks revisited. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 319–324.
Anderson, J. L., Crawford, C. B., Nadeau, J., & Lindberg, T. (1992). Was the Duchess of Windsor right? A cross-cultural review of the socioecology of ideals of female body shape. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 197–227.
Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424.
Biro, F. M., Falkner, F., Khoury, P., Morrison, J., & Lucky, A. (1992). Areolar and breast staging in adolescent girls. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 5, 271–272.
Brown, T. P., La, H., Ringrose, C., Hyland, R. E., Cole, A. A., & Brotherston, T. M. (1999). A method for assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 52, 353–359.
Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Cant, J. G. H. (1981). Hypothesis for the evolution of human breasts and buttocks. The American Naturalist, 117, 199–204.
Caro, T. M. (1987). Human breasts: Unsupported hypotheses reviewed. Human Evolution, 2, 271–282.
Caro, T. M., & Sellen, D. W. (1990). The reproductive advantages of fat in women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 51–66.
Carter, L. E. J., & Heath, B. H. (1990). Somatotyping: Development and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clarys, J. P., Martin, A. D., & Drinkwater, D. T. (1984). Gross tissue weights in the human body by cadaver dissection. Human Biology, 56, 459–473.
Dufour, D. L., & Slather, M. L. (2002). Comparative and evolutionary dimensions of the energetics of human pregnancy and lactation. American Journal of Human Biology, 14, 584–602.
Ford, C. S., & Beach, F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper and Row.
Freund, K., Langevin, R., & Zajac, Y. (1974). Heterosexual aversion in homosexual males: A second experiment. British Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 177–180.
Furnham, A., Dias, M., & McClelland, A. (1998). The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles, 34, 311–326.
Furnham, A., Swami, V., & Shah, K. (2006). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 443–454.
Gallup, G. G. (1982). Permanent breast enlargement in human females: A sociobiological analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 11, 597–601.
Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89–96.
Garn, S. M., & French, N. Y. (1963). Post-partum and age changes in areolar pigmentation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 85, 873–875.
Garn, S. M., Selby, S., & Crawford, M. R. (1956). Skin reflectance studies in children and adults. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 14, 101–117.
Garner, P., Smith, T., Baea, M., Lai, D., & Heywood, P. (1994). Maternal nutritional depletion in a rural area of Papua New Guinea. Tropical and Geographical Medicine, 46, 169–171.
Goodhart, C. B. (1964). A biological view of toplessness. New Scientist, 407, 558–560.
Grammer, K., Fink, B., Juette, A., Ronzal, G., & Thornhill, R. (2001). Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. In G. Rhodes & I. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in visual cognition I: Facial attractiveness (pp. 91–125). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Grammer, K., Fink, B., Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78, 385–407.
Guthrie, R. D. (1976). Body hot spots. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Horvath, T. (1981). Physical attractiveness: The influence of selected torso parameters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10, 21–24.
Jasienska, G. (2009). Reproduction and lifespan: Trade-offs, overall energy budgets, intergenerational costs, and costs neglected by research. American Journal of Human Biology, 21, 524–532.
Jasienska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B, 271, 1213–1217.
Jesser, C. J. (1971). Reflections on breast attention. Journal of Sex Research, 7, 13–25.
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.
LeBlanc, S. A., & Barnes, E. (1974). Letter to the editor. The American Naturalist, 108, 577–578.
Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (1996). Comparison of salivary steroid profiles in naturally occurring conception and non-conception cycles. Human Reproduction, 11, 2090–2096.
Low, B. S., Alexander, R. D., & Noonan, K. M. (1987). Human hips, breasts and buttocks: Is fat deceptive? Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 249–257.
Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G. H., & Leinster, S. J. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 223–236.
Marlowe, F. (1998). The nubility hypothesis: The human breast as an honest signal of residual reproductive value. Human Nature, 9, 263–271.
Mascia-Lees, F. E., Relethford, J. H., & Sorger, T. (1986). Evolutionary perspectives on permanent breast enlargement in human females. American Anthropologist, 88, 423–428.
Møller, A. P. (1999). Asymmetry as a predictor of growth, fecundity and survival. Ecology Letters, 2, 149–156.
Møller, A. P., Soler, M., & Thornhill, R. (1995). Breast asymmetry, sexual selection, and human reproductive success. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 207–219.
Møller, A. P., & Swaddle, J. P. (1997). Asymmetry, developmental stability and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: A meta analysis. The American Naturalist, 151, 174–192.
Montagna, W., & Macpherson, E. E. (1974). Some neglected aspects of the anatomy of the breasts. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 63, 10–16.
Muzaffar, F., Hussain, I., & Haroon, T. S. (1998). Physiologic skin changes during pregnancy: A study of 140 cases. International Journal of Dermatology, 37, 429–431.
Niefert, M. R., Seacat, J. M., & Jobe, W. E. (1985). Lactation failure due to insufficient glandular development of the breast. Pediatrics, 76, 823–828.
Pawlowski, B. (1999). Permanent breasts as a side effect of subcutaneous fat tissue increase in human evolution. Homo, 50, 149–162.
Pawlowski, B. (2001). The evolution of gluteal/femoral fat deposits and balance during pregnancy in bipedal Homo. Current Anthropology, 42, 572–574.
Pawlowski, B., & Grabarczyk, M. (2003). Center of body mass and the evolution of female body shape. American Journal of Human Biology, 15, 144–150.
Pawson, I. G., & Petrakis, N. L. (1975). Comparison of breast pigmentation among women of different racial groups. Human Biology, 47, 441–450.
Pond, C. (1997). The biological origins of adipose tissue in humans. In M. E. Morbeck, A. Galloway, & A. L. Zihlman (Eds.), The evolving female: A life history perspective (pp. 147–162). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2007). Symmetry, attractiveness and sexual selection. In R. I. M. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 333–364). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scutt, D., Lancaster, G. A., & Manning, J. T. (2006). Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research, 8. doi:10.1186/bcr1388.
Short, R. V. (1980). The origins of human sexuality. In C. R. Austin & R. V. Short (Eds.), Reproduction in mammals, Vol. 8. Human sexuality (pp. 1–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simblet, S. (2001). Anatomy for the artist. New York: DK Publishing.
Singh, D. (1995). Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: Role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 465–481.
Singh, D. (2002). Female mate choice at a glance: Relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23(suppl. 4), 81–91.
Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507.
Smith, N. W. (1986). Psychology and evolution of breasts [Letter to the editor]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1, 285–286.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tanner, J. M. (1962). Growth at adolescence (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Thornhill, R., & Grammer, K. (1999). The body and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 105–120.
Tracer, D. P. (1991). Fertility-related changes in maternal body composition among the Au of Papua New Guinea. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 85, 393–406.
Vandeweyer, E., & Hertens, D. (2002). Quantification of glands and fat in breast tissue: An experimental determination. Annals of Anatomy, 184, 181–184.
Wells, J. C. K. (2007). Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best Practice and Research Endocrinology and Metabolism, 21, 415–430.
Winkvist, A., Rasmussen, K. M., & Habicht, J. P. (1992). A new definition of maternal depletion syndrome. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 691–694.
We would like to thank the Editor and three anonymous reviewers for helpful and detailed comments that helped improve the article.
About this article
Cite this article
Dixson, B.J., Vasey, P.L., Sagata, K. et al. Men’s Preferences for Women’s Breast Morphology in New Zealand, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea. Arch Sex Behav 40, 1271–1279 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9680-6