Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 725–740 | Cite as

Sexual Well-Being: A Comparison of U.S. Black and White Women in Heterosexual Relationships

Original Paper


In the United States, considerable attention has been directed to sexual behaviors of black and white adolescents, particularly age at first sexual experience and the prevalence of teenage pregnancies. More limited attention has been paid to comparing established sexual relationships in these two racial groups. In this study, we used a national probability sample to compare black (n = 251) and white (n = 544) American women, aged 20–65 years, who were in an established heterosexual relationship of at least 6 months duration. We focused on two aspects of their sexual well-being; how a woman evaluated (1) her sexual relationship and (2) her own sexuality. A range of possible determinants of sexual well-being, including demographic factors, physical and mental health, and aspects of the women’s recent sexual experiences, were also assessed using Telephone-Audio-Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing (T-ACASI). We found no significant difference between black and white women in their evaluation of their sexual relationships nor in the independent variables that were correlated with this evaluation. Black women, however, evaluated their own sexuality more positively than white women. In examining the correlates of this evaluation, a woman’s rating of her own sexual attractiveness proved to be the strongest predictor, with black women rating themselves significantly more sexually attractive than did the white women. Overall, these findings were consistent with previous findings that, compared to white women, black women in the United States have higher self-esteem and tend towards more independence and individualism.


Sexual well-being Women Heterosexual relationships Ethnicity Sexual attractiveness 


  1. Baker, C. N. (2005). Images of women’s sexuality in advertisements: A content analysis of black- and white-oriented women’s and men’s magazines. Sex Roles, 52, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bancroft, J. (2009). Human sexuality and its problems (3rd ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Bancroft, J., Loftus, J., & Long, J. S. (2003a). Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 193–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bancroft, J., Loftus, J., & Long, J. S. (2003b). Reply to Rosen and Laumann. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkowitz, A., & Padavic, I. (1999). Getting a man or getting ahead: A comparison of White and Black sororities. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 27, 530–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brant, R. (1990). Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 46, 1171–1178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Browning, C. R., & Burrington, L. A. (2006). Racial differences in sexual and fertility attitudes in an urban setting. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 236–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cawood, E. H. H., & Bancroft, J. (1996). Steroid hormones, the menopause, sexuality and well-being of women. Psychological Medicine, 26, 925–936.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dugger, K. (1988). Social location and gender-role attitudes: A comparison of Black and White women. Gender & Society, 2, 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gebhard, P. H., & Johnson, A. B. (1979). The Kinsey data: Marginal tabulations of the 1938–63 interviews. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  11. Graham, C. A., Ramos, R., Bancroft, J., Maglaya, C., & Farley, T. M. M. (1995). The effects of steroidal contraceptives on the well-being and sexuality of women: A double blind, placebo-controlled, two centre study of combined and progestogen-only methods. Contraception, 52, 363–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haavio-Mannila, E., & Kontula, O. (1997). Correlates of increased sexual satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 399–419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houston, L. N. (1981). Romanticism and eroticism among Black and White college students. Adolescence, 16, 263–272.Google Scholar
  15. Hughes, M., & Demo, D. H. (1989). Self-perceptions of Black Americans: Self-esteem and personal efficacy. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 132–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  17. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  18. Korn, E. L., & Graubard, B. I. (1999). Analysis of health surveys. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., Glasser, D. B., Kang, J.-H., Wang, T., Levinson, B., et al. (2006). A cross-national study of subjective sexual well-being among older women and men: Findings from the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 145–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Mahay, J., Laumann, E. O., & Michaels, S. (2001). Race, gender and class in sexual scripts. In E. O. Laumann & R. T. Michael (Eds.), Sex, love and health in America (pp. 197–238). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. McCabe, J., Tanner, A. E., & Heiman, J. (2010). The impact of gender expectations on meanings of sex and sexuality: Results from a cognitive interview study. Sex Roles, 62, 252–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCullagh, P. (1980). Regression models for ordinal data (with Discussion). Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 42, 109–142.Google Scholar
  25. Nathanson, C. A. (2000). The impregnable myth of teenage pregnancy. In J. Bancroft (Ed.), The role of theory in sex research (pp. 241–257). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Njikam Savage, O. M., & Tchombe, T. M. (1994). Anthropological perspectives on sexual behaviour in Africa. Annual Review of Sex Research, 5, 50–72.Google Scholar
  27. Oggins, J., Leber, D., & Veroff, J. (1993a). Race and gender differences in Black and White newly-weds’ perceptions of sexual and marital relations. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oggins, J., Veroff, J., & Leber, D. (1993b). Perceptions of marital interactions among Black and White newly-weds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 494–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J., Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will divorce: A 14 year longitudinal study of black and white couples. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 19, 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parker, R. G., Herdt, G., & Carballo, M. (1991). Sexual culture, HIV transmission and AIDS research. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patterson, O. (1999). Rituals of blood: Consequences of slavery in two American centuries. New York: Basic Civitas Books.Google Scholar
  32. Raley, R. K. (1996). A shortage of marriageable men? A note on the role of cohabitation in race differences in marriage. American Sociological Review, 61, 973–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reiss, I. L. (1964). Premarital sexual permissiveness among Negroes and Whites. American Sociological Review, 29, 688–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reiss, I. L. (1967). The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness. New York: Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  35. Richters, J., Grulich, A. E., de Visser, R. O., Smith, A. M. A., & Rissel, C. E. (2003). Sexual and emotional satisfaction in regular relationships and preferred frequency of sex among a representative sample of adults. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27, 171–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roberts, A., Cash, T. F., Feingold, A., & Johnson, B. T. (2006). Are Black-White differences in females’ body dissatisfaction decreasing? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 1121–1131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosen, R. C., & Laumann, E. O. (2003). The prevalence of sexual problems in women: How valid are comparisons across studies? Commentary on Bancroft, Loftus and Long’s (2003) Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 209–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanders, S. A., Graham, C. M., Bass, J., & Bancroft, J. (2001). A prospective study of the effects of oral contraceptives on sexuality and well-being and their relationship to discontinuation. Contraception, 64, 51–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Santelli, J. S., Lindberg, L. D., Abma, J., McNeely, C. S., & Resnick, M. (2000). The association of sexual behaviors with socio-economic status, family structure, and race/ethnicity among US adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1582–1588.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spira, A., Bajos, N., & The ACSF Group. (1994). Sexual behaviour and AIDS. Hampshire, UK: Avebury.Google Scholar
  41. Staples, R. (1981). The Black family: Essays and studies. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  42. Sterk-Elifson, C. (1994). Sexuality among African-American women. In A. S. Rossi (Ed.), Sexuality across the life course (pp. 99–126). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Twenge, J. M., & Crocker, J. (2002). Race and self-esteem: Meta-analyses comparing Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians and comment on Gray-Little and Hafdahl (2000). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 371–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Visotsky, H. M. (1969). A community project for unwed pregnant adolescents. In O. Pollak & A. S. Friedman (Eds.), Family dynamics and female sexual delinquency (pp. 78–86). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.Google Scholar
  45. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. (1998). SF-12. How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric.Google Scholar
  46. Weinberg, M. S., & Williams, C. (1988). Black sexuality: A test of two theories. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wellings, K., Collumbien, M., Slaymaker, E., Singh, S., Hodges, Z., Patel, D., et al. (2006). Sexual behaviour in context: A global perspective. Lancet, 368, 1706–1728.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears. The world of the new urban poor. New York: Vintage Paperback.Google Scholar
  49. Winship, C., & Mare, R. D. (1984). Regression models with ordinal variables. American Sociological Review, 49, 512–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wyatt, G. E., Peters, S. D., & Guthrie, D. (1988). Kinsey revisited, Part II: Comparisons of the sexual socialization and sexual behavior of Black women over 33 years. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 17, 289–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Bancroft
    • 1
    • 5
  • J. Scott Long
    • 2
    • 3
  • Janice McCabe
    • 4
  1. 1.The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and ReproductionIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.Department of StatisticsIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of SociologyFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  5. 5.HorspathUK

Personalised recommendations