What’s Wrong With Sex?
- 335 Downloads
Several psychiatrists and psychologists have recently made important criticisms of specific diagnostic innovations proposed by the DSM-5’s Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders Work Group (DeClue, 2009; Frances, 2010; Green, 2010; O’Donohue, 2010). As a historian and philosopher of science, my goal here is more general: I want to show that what this Work Group is trying to accomplish undermines the definitions of “paraphilia” and “mental disorder” that have been operative since the DSM-III. If the revisions proposed by the Work Group are implemented, the DSM-5 will be closer to the DSM-I and DSM-II than to their successors. In order to understand why this is so, we need first to take a short historical detour and to look at how “mental disorder” and “paraphilias” have traditionally been defined. Only then will we be in a position to grasp the magnitude of what the DSM-5 is trying to accomplish.
As is well known, the DSM-I (American Psychiatric Association, 1952) and DSM-II(American...
KeywordsMental Disorder American Psychiatric Association Sexual Minority Sexual Arousal Sexual Interest
- American Psychiatric Association. (1952). Diagnostic and statistical manua: Mental disorders. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. (1968). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Cartwright, S. (1851). Report on the diseases and physical peculiarities of the Negro race. The New-Orleans Medical and Surgical Journal, 7, 691–715.Google Scholar
- Frances, A. (2010, March 17). DSM5 and sexual disorders—Just say no. Psychiatric Times. Google Scholar
- Wakefield, J. C., & First, M. B. (2003). Clarifying the distinction between disorder and nondisorder. In K. A. Phillips, M. B. First, & H. A. Pincus (Eds.), Advancing DSM: Dilemmas in psychiatric diagnosis (pp. 23–55). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Zucker, K. J. (2010, February 22). DSM5: Pandora replies to Dr Frances. Psychiatric Times. Google Scholar