Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 559–564 | Cite as

Evidence to Suggest that Copulatory Vocalizations in Women Are Not a Reflexive Consequence of Orgasm

  • Gayle BrewerEmail author
  • Colin A. Hendrie
Original Paper


The current studies were conducted in order to investigate the phenomenon of copulatory vocalizations and their relationship to orgasm in women. Data were collected from 71 sexually active heterosexual women (M age = 21.68 years ± .52) recruited from the local community through opportunity sampling. The studies revealed that orgasm was most frequently reported by women following self-manipulation of the clitoris, manipulation by the partner, oral sex delivered to the woman by a man, and least frequently during vaginal penetration. More detailed examination of responses during intercourse revealed that, while female orgasms were most commonly experienced during foreplay, copulatory vocalizations were reported to be made most often before and simultaneously with male ejaculation. These data together clearly demonstrate a dissociation of the timing of women experiencing orgasm and making copulatory vocalizations and indicate that there is at least an element of these responses that are under conscious control, providing women with an opportunity to manipulate male behavior to their advantage.


Orgasm Copulatory vocalization Sexual behavior Evolution 


  1. Cox, C. R., & LeBoeuf, B. J. (1977). Female incitation of male competition: A mechanism in sexual selection. American Naturalist, 111, 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate sexuality: Comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Fisher, S. (1973). The female orgasm: Psychology, physiology, fantasy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Garver-Apgar, C. E., Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R. D., Miller, R. D., & Olp, J. J. (2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17, 830–835.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gouzoules, H., Gust, D. A., Donaghey, B., & St. Andre, E. (1998). Estrus vocalizations in two primate species (Cercocebus torquatus atys and Macaca nemestrina): Evidence for an effect of intrasexual competition. Evolution of Communication, 2, 189–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamilton, W. J., & Arrowood, P. C. (1978). Copulatory vocalizations of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus), gibbons (Hylobates hoolock) and humans. Science, 200, 1405–1409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hauser, M. D. (1996). The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Henzi, S. P. (1996). Copulation calls and paternity in chacma baboons. Animal Behaviour, 51, 233–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hrdy, S. B. (1981). The woman that never evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jaanusson, V. (1991). Morphological changes leading to hominid bipedalism. Lethaia, 24, 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lovejoy, C. O. (1988). Evolution of human walking. Scientific American, 259, 118–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maestripieri, D., & Roney, J. R. (2005). Primate copulation calls and postcopulatory female choice. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Connell, S. M., & Cowlishaw, G. (1994). Infanticide avoidance, sperm competition and mate choice: The function of copulation calls in female baboons. Animal Behaviour, 48, 687–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Palombit, R. A. (2000). Infanticide and the evolution of male-female bonds in animals. In C. P. van Schaik & C. H. Janson (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 239–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pfefferle, D., Brauch, K., Heistermann, M., Hodges, J. K., & Fischer, J. (2008). Female Barbary macaque (Macaca sylvanus) copulation calls do not reveal the fertile phase but influence mating outcome. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 571–578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pradhan, G. R., Engelhardt, A., van Schaik, C. P., & Maestripieri, D. (2006). The evolution of female competition calls in primates: A review and a new model. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59, 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Puts, D. A., & Dawood, K. (2006). The evolution of female orgasm: Adaptation or byproduct? Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 467–472.Google Scholar
  18. Semple, S. (2001). Individuality and male discrimination of female copulation calls in the yellow baboon. Animal Behaviour, 61, 1023–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., & Comer, R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1601–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Todt, D., Hammerschmidt, K., Ansorge, V., & Fischer, J. (1995). The vocal behavior of Barbary macaques: Call features and their performance in infants and adults. In E. Zimmermann, J. D. Newman, & U. Jurgens (Eds.), Current topics in primate vocal communication (pp. 141–160). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  21. Todt, D., & Pohl, R. (1984). Communicative strategies in estrous Barbary ape females (Macaca sylvanus) during copulation behaviour: Advertising, triggering, affiliating. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft, 7, 225.Google Scholar
  22. Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. Kinzey (Ed.), Primate models of hominid behavior (pp. 183–237). New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of Central LancashirePrestonEngland
  2. 2.Institute of Psychological SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsEngland

Personalised recommendations