Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 311–320 | Cite as

Effects of Gender and Psychosocial Factors on “Friends with Benefits” Relationships Among Young Adults

Original Paper

Abstract

Friends with benefits relationships (FWB) are a blend of friendship and physical intimacy outside of a committed romantic relationship. This study examined young adults’ (n = 889) engagement in, and reactions to, a FWB relationship in the past year based on their gender, psychological distress, alcohol use, and relationship attitudes. Men (54.3%) were more likely than women (42.9%) to report at least one FWB relationship and both men and women reported that FWB relationships were associated with more positive emotional reactions than negative ones although this difference was larger for men. Greater alcohol use was related to engaging in a FWB relationship and this relationship was stronger for women. Further, thoughtfulness about relationship decisions moderated the relationship between alcohol use and engaging in FWB relationships, and again this moderation effect was stronger for women than men. Young adults with more psychological distress and who felt constrained in the FWB relationship were more likely to report negative emotional reactions. Implications for psychoeducational programs and future research are offered.

Keywords

Casual sex Friends with benefits Romantic relationships Psychological well-being 

References

  1. Afifi, W. A., & Faulkner, S. L. (2000). On being ‘just friends’: The frequency and impact of sexual activity in cross-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bisson, M. A., & Levine, T. R. (2009). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 66–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braithwaite, S., Delevi, R., & Fincham, F. D. (in press). Romantic relationships and the physical and mental health of college students. Personal Relationships.Google Scholar
  4. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole, J. C., Rabin, A. S., Smith, T. L., & Kaufman, A. S. (2004). Development and validation of a Rasch-derived CES-D Short Form. Psychological Assessment, 16, 360–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corrigan, P. W., & Phelan, S. M. (2004). Social support and recovery in people with serious mental illnesses. Community Mental Health Journal, 40, 513–523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desiderato, L. L., & Crawford, H. J. (1995). Risky sexual behavior in college students: Relationship between number of sex partners, disclosure of previous risky behavior, and alcohol use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn, B. D., Stefanovitch, I., Buchan, K., Lawrence, A. D., & Dalgleish, T. (2009). A reduction in positive self-judgment bias is uniquely related to the anhedonic symptoms of depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 374–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1999). The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2009). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4.
  11. Fincham, F. D., Stanley, S. M., & Rhoades, G. (in press). Relationship education in emerging adulthood: Problems and prospects. In F. D. Fincham & M. Cui (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. New York: Institute for American Values.Google Scholar
  13. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoebel, B. G., Rada, P. V., Mark, G. P., & Pothos, E. N. (1999). Neural systems for reinforcement and inhibition of eating: Relevance to eating, addiction, and depression. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 558–572). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hughes, M., Morrison, K., & Asada, K. J. K. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Irwin, W., Davidson, R. J., Lowe, M. J., Mock, B. J., Sorenson, J. A., & Turski, P. A. (1996). Human amygdala activation detected with echoplanar functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroreport, 7, 1765–1769.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Longmore, M. A., Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Rudolph, J. L. (2004). Self-esteem, depressive symptoms, and adolescents’ sexual onset. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahalik, J. R., Good, G. E., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2003). Masculinity scripts, presenting concerns and help-seeking: Implications for practice and training. Professional Psychology: Theory, Research and Practice, 34, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2006). Hooking up: The relationship contexts of “nonrelationship” sex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 459–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McGinty, K., Knox, D., & Zusman, M. E. (in press). Friends with benefits: Woman want “friends,” men want “benefits”. College Student Journal. Google Scholar
  21. Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. (2008). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1.
  22. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pearson, M., Stanley, S. M., & Kline, G. H. (2005). Within my reach (pp. 61–85). Greenwood, CO: PREP for Individuals, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Puentes, J., Knox, D., & Zusman, M. E. (2008). Participants in “friends with benefits” relationships. College Student Journal, 42, 176–180.Google Scholar
  25. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Regan, P. C., & Dreyer, C. S. (1999). Lust? Love? Status? Young adults’ motives for engaging in casual sex. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 11, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J., Carey, M. P., Vanable, P. A., Senn, T. E., Coury-Doniger, P., & Urban, M. A. (2009). Alcohol consumption, drug use, and condom use among STD clinic patients. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70, 762–770.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stanley, S. M. (2002). What is it with men and commitment, anyway? Keynote address to the 6th annual Smart Marriages conference. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. H., & Willliams, T. (2007). Future Relationship Confidence Scale. Unpublished measure, University of Denver.Google Scholar
  34. Waite, L. J., Browning, D., Doherty, W. J., Gallagher, M., Luo, Y., & Stanley, S. M. (2002). Does divorce make people happy? Findings from a study of unhappy marriages. New York: Institute for American Values.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Education and Counseling Psychology DepartmentCollege of Education, University of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Family InstituteFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations