Studies of human physical traits and mate preferences often use questionnaires asking participants to rate the attractiveness of images. Female waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), breast size, and facial appearance have all been implicated in assessments by men of female attractiveness. However, very little is known about how men make fine-grained visual assessments of such images. We used eye-tracking techniques to measure the numbers of visual fixations, dwell times, and initial fixations made by men who viewed front-posed photographs of the same woman, computer-morphed so as to differ in her WHR (0.7 or 0.9) and breast size (small, medium, or large). Men also rated these images for attractiveness. Results showed that the initial visual fixation (occurring within 200 ms from the start of each 5 s test) involved either the breasts or the waist. Both these body areas received more first fixations than the face or the lower body (pubic area and legs). Men looked more often and for longer at the breasts, irrespective of the WHR of the images. However, men rated images with an hourglass shape and a slim waist (0.7 WHR) as most attractive, irrespective of breast size. These results provide quantitative data on eye movements that occur during male judgments of the attractiveness of female images, and indicate that assessments of the female hourglass figure probably occur very rapidly.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anderson, P. (1983). The reproductive role of the human breast. Current Anthropology, 24, 25–45.
Anderson, J. L. (1988). Breasts, hips and buttocks revisited. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 319–324.
Brown, T. P., La, H., Ringrose, C., Hyland, R. E., Cole, A. A., & Brotherston, T. M. (1999). A method for assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 52, 353–359.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Clarys, J. P., Martin, A. D., & Drinkwater, D. T. (1984). Gross tissue weights in the human body by cadaver dissection. Human Biology, 56, 459–473.
Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Bishop, P., & Parish, A. (2008). Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: A New Zealand–U.S. comparative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9441-y.
Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Li, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007). Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 88–95.
Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Morgan, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007). Human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 369–375.
Fink, B., Matts, P. J., Klingenberg, H., Kuntze, S., Bettina, W., & Grammer, K. (2008). Visual attention to variation in facial skin color distribution. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 7, 155–161.
Furnham, A., Swami, V., & Shah, K. (2006). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 443–454.
Furnham, A., Tan, T., & McManus, C. (1997). Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 540–549.
Gallup, G. G. (1982). Permanent breast enlargement in human female: A sociobiological analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 11, 597–601.
Grammer, K., Fink, B., Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78, 385–407.
Hassebrauck, M. (1998). The visual process method: A new method to study physical attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 111–123.
Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness: Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 501–513.
Horvath, T. (1981). Physical attractiveness: The influence of selected torso parameters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10, 21–24.
Jasienska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B, 271, 1213–1217.
Johnson, K. L., & Tassinary, L. G. (2005). Perceiving sex directly and indirectly: Meaning in motion and morphology. Psychological Science, 16, 890–897.
Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2007). Menarche is related to fat distribution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 133, 1147–1151.
Law-Smith, M. J. L., Perrett, D. I., Jones, B. C., Cornwall, R. E., Moore, F. R., Feinberg, D. R., et al. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 273, 135–140.
LeBlanc, S. A., & Barnes, E. (1974). Letter to the editor. American Naturalist, 108, 577–578.
Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (1996). Comparison of salivary steroid profiles in naturally occurring conception and non-conception cycles. Human Reproduction, 11, 2090–2096.
Low, B. S., Alexander, R. D., & Noonan, K. M. (1987). Human hips, breasts and buttocks: Is fat deceptive? Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 249–257.
Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Kambe, G. (2006). Detection of differential viewing patterns to erotic and non-erotic stimuli using eye-tracking methodology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 569–575.
Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Strauss, G. P. (2008). Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic visual stimuli. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 219–228.
Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., & Gailliot, M. T. (2008). Selective attention to signs of success: Social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 488–501.
Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., & DeWall, C. N. (2007). Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating-related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 28–36.
Marlowe, F. (1998). The nubility hypothesis: The human breast as an honest signal of residual reproductive value. Human Nature, 9, 263–271.
Marlowe, F., Apicella, C. L., & Reed, D. (2005). Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist- to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 371–378.
Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Doubleday.
Pawlowski, B. (1999). Permanent breasts as a side effect of subcutaneous fat tissue increase in human evolution. Homo, 50, 149–162.
Pond, C. M. (1998). The fats of life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rupp, H. A., & Wallen, K. (2007). Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: An eye tracking study of men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 524–533.
Simblet, S. (2001). Anatomy for the artist. New York: DK Publishing.
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.
Singh, D. (2002). Female mate value at a glance: Relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neauroendocrine Letters, 23(Suppl. 4), 81–91.
Singh, D. (2006). The universal allure of the hourglass figure: An evolutionary theory of female sexual attractiveness. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 33, 359–370.
Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507.
Smith, N. W. (1986). Psychology and evolution of breasts [Letter to the editor]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1, 285–286.
Suschinsky, K. D., Elias, L. J., & Krupp, D. B. (2007). Looking for Ms Right: Allocating attention to facilitate mate choice decisions. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 428–441.
Sütterlin, B., Brunner, T. A., & Opwis, K. (2008). Eye-tracking the cancellation and focus model for preference judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 904–911.
Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wiggins, J. S., Wiggins, N., & Conger, J. C. (1968). Correlates of heterosexual somatic preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 82–90.
About this article
Cite this article
Dixson, B.J., Grimshaw, G.M., Linklater, W.L. et al. Eye-Tracking of Men’s Preferences for Waist-to-Hip Ratio and Breast Size of Women. Arch Sex Behav 40, 43–50 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9523-5
- Sexual attractiveness
- Female waist-to-hip ratio
- Female breast size