Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 626–630 | Cite as

Boyhood Sexual Experiences with Older Males: Using the Internet for Behavioral Research

  • David L. Riegel
Letter to the Editor

Empirical research into the sexuality of children goes back many decades and, in the past, it has been possible to interview children directly in both clinical and non-clinical settings (Bender & Blau, 1937; Sandfort, 1987). Retrospective surveys of childhood sexual experiences have also been conducted in college introductory courses in the social sciences (see, e.g., Rind, Bauserman, & Tromovitch, 1998).

The advent of the Internet has opened up new possibilities for anonymous behavioral research with otherwise inaccessible participants (e.g., Duffy, 2002; Rhodes, Bowie, & Hergenrather, 2003) and some researchers conclude that the Internet can provide data equal in validity and quality to in-person “paper and pencil” studies (Cronk & West, 2002; Pettit, 2002). The present research was conducted via the Internet by posting links to an online questionnaire on various Internet newsgroups, which were selected based on non-relatedness to the topic in question, excluding, for example,...

Keywords

Child Sexual Abuse General Mental Health Current Mental Health Personal Counseling Sexual Aspect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bender, L., & Blau, A. (1937). The reaction of children to sexual relations with adults. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 7, 500–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cronk, B., & West, J. (2002). Personality research on the Internet: A comparison of Web-based and traditional instruments in take-home and in-class settings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 177–180.Google Scholar
  3. Duffy, M. (2002). Methodological issues in Web-based research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34, 83–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Jenkins, P. (1998). Moral panic. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Money, J., & Weinrich, J. (1983). Juvenile, pedophile, heterophile: Hermeneutics of science, medicine and law. International Journal of Medicine and Law, 2, 39–54.Google Scholar
  7. Pettit, F. (2002). A comparison of World-Wide Web and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 50–54.Google Scholar
  8. Rhodes, S., Bowie, K., & Hergenrather, K. (2003). Collecting behavioral data using the world wide web: Considerations for researchers. Journal of Epidemiological Community Health, 57, 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rind, B., Bauserman, R., & Tromovich, P. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sandfort, T. (1987). Boys on their contacts with men. Elmhurst, NY: Global Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Tindall, R. H. (1978). The male adolescent involved with a pederast becomes an adult. Journal of Homosexuality, 3(4), 373–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Riegel
    • 1
  1. 1.PhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations