Men and women living in New Zealand and California completed five studies regarding human physique and sexual attractiveness. In Studies 1–3, women rated images of male stimuli and, in Studies 4–5, men rated female stimuli. In Study 1, women in both countries rated mesomorphic (muscular) and average male somatotypes as most attractive, followed by ectomorphic (slim) and endomorphic (heavily built) figures. In Study 2, amount and distribution of masculine trunk hair (chest and abdominal) was altered progressively in a series of front-posed male figures. In both countries, the image lacking any trunk hair was rated as the most attractive, with a steady decline in attractiveness as hirsutism became more pronounced. Study 3 assessed attractiveness of front-posed male figures that varied only in the length of the non-erect penis. Five lengths were presented: The smallest penile size was rated as less attractive than three intermediate sizes. The largest penile size was not the most attractive, but received higher scores than the unaltered and smallest penile size. In Study 4, men rated the attractiveness of back-posed female images varying in waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) (from 0.5 to 1.0). The 0.7 WHR figure was rated more attractive in New Zealand and the 0.6 WHR in California. Study 5 measured the attractiveness of female skin color; men expressed preferences for lighter skinned female figures in New Zealand and California. Results indicate very similar preferences for sexually dimorphic physical traits among men and women of European extraction, living in two culturally and geographically different environments.
This is a preview of subscription content,to check access.
Access this article
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Aoki, K. (2002). Sexual selection as a cause of human skin colour variation: Darwin’s hypothesis revisited. Annals of Human Biology, 6, 589–608.
Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424.
Beck, W. A., & Williams, D. A. (1972). California: A history of the Golden State. New York: Doubleday & Company.
Bramble, D. M., & Lieberman, D. E. (2004). Endurance running and the evolution of Homo. Nature, 432, 345–352.
Boroughs, M., Cafri, G., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). Male body depilation: Prevalence and associated features of body hair removal. Sex Roles, 52, 637–644.
Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
Carter, L. E. J., & Heath, B. H. (1990). Somatotyping: Development and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate sexuality: Comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes and human beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dixson, A. F., Dixson, B. J., & Anderson, M. J. (2005). Sexual selection and the evolution of visually conspicuous sexually dimorphic traits in male monkeys, apes and human beings. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16, 1–19.
Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Li, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007a). Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 88–95.
Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Morgan, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007b). Human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 369–375.
Dixson, A. F., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M. J. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 29–39.
Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Matts, P. J. (2006). Visible skin color distribution plays a role in the perception of age, attractiveness, and health in female faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 433–442.
Frost, P. (1988). Human skin colour: A possible relationship between its sexual dimorphism and its social perception. Perspectives in Biological Medicine, 32, 38–58.
Frost, P. (1994). Geographic distribution of human skin colour: A selective compromise between natural and sexual selection? Human Evolution, 9, 141–153.
Furnham, A., Tan, T., & McManus, C. (1997). Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 540–549.
Hensley, W. E. (1994). Height as a basis for interpersonal attraction. Adolescence, 29, 469–474.
Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 501–513.
Hughes, S. M., & Gallup, G. G. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 171–178.
Jablonski, N. G. (2006). Skin: A natural history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2000). The evolution of skin coloration. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 57–106.
Jasienska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B, 271, 1213–1217.
Katzmarzyk, P. T., Malina, R. M., Song, T. M. K., & Bouchard, C. (1998). Somatotype and indicators of metabolic fitness in youth. American Journal of Human Biology, 10, 341–350.
Kirch, P. V. (2000). On the road of the winds: An archaeological history of the Pacific Islands before European contact. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2007). Menarche is related to fat distribution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 133, 1147–1151.
Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2008). Waist-hip ratio and cognitive ability: Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources? Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 26–34.
Law-Smith, M. J. L., Perret, D. I., Jones, B. C., Cornwall, R. E., Moore, F. R., Feinberg, D. R., et al. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 273, 135–140.
Lynch, S. M., & Zellner, D. A. (1999). Figure preference in two generations of men: The use of figure drawings illustrating differences in muscle mass. Sex Roles, 40, 833–843.
Marlowe, F. (2004). Mate preferences among hunter-gatherers. Human Nature, 15, 365–376.
Marlowe, F., Apicella, C. L., & Reed, D. (2005). Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist- to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 371–378.
Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Doubleday.
Mueller, U., & Mazur, A. (2001). Evidence of unconstrained directional selection for male tallness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 302–311.
Nettle, D. (2001). Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Human Nature, 13, 473–491.
Pagel, M., & Bodmer, W. (2003). A naked ape would have fewer parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B, 270(Suppl.), S117–S119.
Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Lipowicz, A. (2000). Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature, 403, 156.
Potts, M., & Short, R. V. (1999). Ever since Adam and Eve: The evolution of human sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, S. C., Havlicek, J., Flegr, J., Hruskova, M., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., et al. (2004). Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B, 271, S270–S272.
Robins, A. H. (1991). Biological perspectives on human pigmentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sheldon, W. H., Dupertuis, C. W., & McDermott, E. (1954). Atlas of men. New York: Harpers.
Sheldon, W. H., Stevens, S. S., & Tucker, W. B. (1970). The varieties of human physique: An introduction to constitutional psychology (2nd ed.). Darien, CT: Hafner Publishing Company.
Short, R. V. (1980). The origins of human sexuality. In C. R. Austin & R. V. Short (Eds.), Reproduction in mammals and human sexuality (pp. 1–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simblet, S. (2001). Anatomy for the artist. New York: DK Publishing.
Singh, D. (1993a). Adaptive significance of female attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.
Singh, D. (1993b). Body shape and women’s attractiveness. Human Nature, 4, 297–321.
Singh, D. (2002). Female mate value at a glance: Relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neuroendocrine Letters, 23(Suppl. 4), 81–91.
Singh, D. (2006). The universal allure of the hourglass figure: An evolutionary theory of female sexual attractiveness. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 33, 359–370.
Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507.
Stulhofer, A. (2006). How (un)important is penis size for women with heterosexual experience? [Letter to the editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 5–6.
Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2005a). Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image, 2, 115–128.
Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2005b). Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image, 2, 383–393.
Tanner, J. M. (1978). Foetus into man: Physical growth from conception to maturity. London: Open Books.
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, W. (1996). The evolution of human sexuality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 98–102.
Tovée, M. J., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2001). Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 391–402.
Tovée, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Emery, J. L., & Cornellisen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female sexual attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B, 266, 211–218.
van den Berghe, P., & Frost, P. (1986). Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: A case of gene culture co-evolution. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 9, 87–113.
Wetsman, A., & Marlowe, F. (1999). How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza from Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 219–228.
Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, 321–322.
We would like to thank all the students who responded to the questionnaires at Victoria University of Wellington and Otago University of Dunedin in New Zealand and the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. We also thank three anonymous reviewers and the Editor for most constructive criticisms of the original manuscript.
About this article
Cite this article
Dixson, B.J., Dixson, A.F., Bishop, P.J. et al. Human Physique and Sexual Attractiveness in Men and Women: A New Zealand–U.S. Comparative Study. Arch Sex Behav 39, 798–806 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9441-y