Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human Physique and Sexual Attractiveness in Men and Women: A New Zealand–U.S. Comparative Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Men and women living in New Zealand and California completed five studies regarding human physique and sexual attractiveness. In Studies 1–3, women rated images of male stimuli and, in Studies 4–5, men rated female stimuli. In Study 1, women in both countries rated mesomorphic (muscular) and average male somatotypes as most attractive, followed by ectomorphic (slim) and endomorphic (heavily built) figures. In Study 2, amount and distribution of masculine trunk hair (chest and abdominal) was altered progressively in a series of front-posed male figures. In both countries, the image lacking any trunk hair was rated as the most attractive, with a steady decline in attractiveness as hirsutism became more pronounced. Study 3 assessed attractiveness of front-posed male figures that varied only in the length of the non-erect penis. Five lengths were presented: The smallest penile size was rated as less attractive than three intermediate sizes. The largest penile size was not the most attractive, but received higher scores than the unaltered and smallest penile size. In Study 4, men rated the attractiveness of back-posed female images varying in waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) (from 0.5 to 1.0). The 0.7 WHR figure was rated more attractive in New Zealand and the 0.6 WHR in California. Study 5 measured the attractiveness of female skin color; men expressed preferences for lighter skinned female figures in New Zealand and California. Results indicate very similar preferences for sexually dimorphic physical traits among men and women of European extraction, living in two culturally and geographically different environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, K. (2002). Sexual selection as a cause of human skin colour variation: Darwin’s hypothesis revisited. Annals of Human Biology, 6, 589–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, W. A., & Williams, D. A. (1972). California: A history of the Golden State. New York: Doubleday & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramble, D. M., & Lieberman, D. E. (2004). Endurance running and the evolution of Homo. Nature, 432, 345–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boroughs, M., Cafri, G., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). Male body depilation: Prevalence and associated features of body hair removal. Sex Roles, 52, 637–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. E. J., & Heath, B. H. (1990). Somatotyping: Development and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate sexuality: Comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes and human beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A. F., Dixson, B. J., & Anderson, M. J. (2005). Sexual selection and the evolution of visually conspicuous sexually dimorphic traits in male monkeys, apes and human beings. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16, 1–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Li, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007a). Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 88–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Morgan, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007b). Human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 369–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A. F., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M. J. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 29–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Matts, P. J. (2006). Visible skin color distribution plays a role in the perception of age, attractiveness, and health in female faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, P. (1988). Human skin colour: A possible relationship between its sexual dimorphism and its social perception. Perspectives in Biological Medicine, 32, 38–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, P. (1994). Geographic distribution of human skin colour: A selective compromise between natural and sexual selection? Human Evolution, 9, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Tan, T., & McManus, C. (1997). Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 540–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, W. E. (1994). Height as a basis for interpersonal attraction. Adolescence, 29, 469–474.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 501–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. M., & Gallup, G. G. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, N. G. (2006). Skin: A natural history. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, N. G., & Chaplin, G. (2000). The evolution of skin coloration. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 57–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jasienska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B, 271, 1213–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzmarzyk, P. T., Malina, R. M., Song, T. M. K., & Bouchard, C. (1998). Somatotype and indicators of metabolic fitness in youth. American Journal of Human Biology, 10, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, P. V. (2000). On the road of the winds: An archaeological history of the Pacific Islands before European contact. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2007). Menarche is related to fat distribution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 133, 1147–1151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2008). Waist-hip ratio and cognitive ability: Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources? Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law-Smith, M. J. L., Perret, D. I., Jones, B. C., Cornwall, R. E., Moore, F. R., Feinberg, D. R., et al. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 273, 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, S. M., & Zellner, D. A. (1999). Figure preference in two generations of men: The use of figure drawings illustrating differences in muscle mass. Sex Roles, 40, 833–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. (2004). Mate preferences among hunter-gatherers. Human Nature, 15, 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F., Apicella, C. L., & Reed, D. (2005). Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist- to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, U., & Mazur, A. (2001). Evidence of unconstrained directional selection for male tallness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2001). Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Human Nature, 13, 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, M., & Bodmer, W. (2003). A naked ape would have fewer parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B, 270(Suppl.), S117–S119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Lipowicz, A. (2000). Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature, 403, 156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, M., & Short, R. V. (1999). Ever since Adam and Eve: The evolution of human sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. C., Havlicek, J., Flegr, J., Hruskova, M., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., et al. (2004). Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B, 271, S270–S272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, A. H. (1991). Biological perspectives on human pigmentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, W. H., Dupertuis, C. W., & McDermott, E. (1954). Atlas of men. New York: Harpers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, W. H., Stevens, S. S., & Tucker, W. B. (1970). The varieties of human physique: An introduction to constitutional psychology (2nd ed.). Darien, CT: Hafner Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, R. V. (1980). The origins of human sexuality. In C. R. Austin & R. V. Short (Eds.), Reproduction in mammals and human sexuality (pp. 1–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simblet, S. (2001). Anatomy for the artist. New York: DK Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993a). Adaptive significance of female attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993b). Body shape and women’s attractiveness. Human Nature, 4, 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (2002). Female mate value at a glance: Relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neuroendocrine Letters, 23(Suppl. 4), 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (2006). The universal allure of the hourglass figure: An evolutionary theory of female sexual attractiveness. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 33, 359–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulhofer, A. (2006). How (un)important is penis size for women with heterosexual experience? [Letter to the editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 5–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2005a). Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image, 2, 115–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2005b). Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image, 2, 383–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, J. M. (1978). Foetus into man: Physical growth from conception to maturity. London: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, W. (1996). The evolution of human sexuality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tovée, M. J., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2001). Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tovée, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Emery, J. L., & Cornellisen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female sexual attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B, 266, 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berghe, P., & Frost, P. (1986). Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: A case of gene culture co-evolution. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 9, 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetsman, A., & Marlowe, F. (1999). How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza from Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, 321–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the students who responded to the questionnaires at Victoria University of Wellington and Otago University of Dunedin in New Zealand and the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. We also thank three anonymous reviewers and the Editor for most constructive criticisms of the original manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Barnaby J. Dixson & Alan F. Dixson

  2. Department of Zoology, Otago University, Otago, New Zealand

    Phil J. Bishop

  3. Gender Studies Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Amy Parish

Authors
  1. Barnaby J. Dixson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan F. Dixson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Phil J. Bishop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amy Parish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barnaby J. Dixson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixson, B.J., Dixson, A.F., Bishop, P.J. et al. Human Physique and Sexual Attractiveness in Men and Women: A New Zealand–U.S. Comparative Study. Arch Sex Behav 39, 798–806 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9441-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9441-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation