Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 319–320 | Cite as

The Public Policy Implications of “Hebephilia”: A Response to Blanchard et al. (2008)

Letter to the Editor

References

  1. Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., et al. (2008). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9.
  2. Doren, D. M. (2002). Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitments and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. First, M. B., & Halon, R. L. (in press). Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. Google Scholar
  4. Freund, K., & Costell, R. (1970). The structure of erotic preference in the nondeviant male. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 15–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jenkins, P. (2004). Moral panic: Changing concepts of the child molester in modern America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U. S. 346 (1997). Google Scholar
  7. Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.Google Scholar
  8. Kleinplatz, P. J., & Moser, C. (2005). Politics versus science: An addendum and response to Drs. Spitzer and Fink. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 17, 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lane, C. (2007). Shyness: How normal behavior became a sickness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Marshall, W. L. (1997). Pedophilia: Psychopathology and theory. In D. R. Laws & W. O’Donohue (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 152–174). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Quinsey, V. L., Steinman, C. M., Bergerson, S. G., & Holmes, T. F. (1975). Penile circumference, skin conductance, and ranking responses of child molesters and “normals” to sexual and nonsexual visual stimuli. Behavior Therapy, 6, 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Seto, M. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zander, T. K. (2005). Civil commitment without psychosis: The law’s reliance on the weakest links in psychodiagnosis. Journal of Sex Offender Civil Commitment: Science and the Law, 1, 17–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.El CerritoUSA
  2. 2.California School of Professional PsychologySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations