Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 190–202 | Cite as

Ethnic Differences in Sexual Attitudes of U.S. College Students: Gender, Acculturation, and Religiosity Factors

Original Paper

Abstract

Although it has been hypothesized that culture and religion play an important role in sexuality, the relative roles of acculturation and religiosity on ethnic differences in sexual attitudes have not been often empirically explored. The present study assessed differences in sexual attitudes in Euro-American, Asian, and Hispanic American populations using measures of acculturation to analyze the relative effects of heritage and mainstream cultures, as well as religiosity, within each ethnic group. A total of 1,415 college students (67% Euro-American, 16% Hispanic, 17% Asian; 32% men, 68% women) completed questionnaires which assessed attitudes towards homosexuality, gender role traditionality, casual sex, and extramarital sex. In concordance with previous studies, Asians reported more conservative sexual attitudes than did their Hispanic and Euro-American peers. Hispanics reported sexual attitudes similar to that of Euro-Americans. For both Hispanic and Asians, higher acculturation predicted sexual attitudes similar to that of Euro-Americans. For Asian, Hispanic, and Euro-American women, there was a significant interaction between intrinsic religiosity and spirituality such that the relationship between conservativism of sexual attitudes and intrinsic religiosity was stronger at higher levels of spirituality. In Euro-Americans and Asians, intrinsic religiosity and religious fundamentalism strongly predicted conservative sexual attitudes; while still significant, these relationships were not as pronounced in the Hispanic sample, implying an ethnic-by-religious effect. Novel to this study, acculturation did not mediate the relationship between religiosity and sexual attitudes, indicating that ethnic differences in religiosity effects were distinct from acculturation.

Keywords

Ethnic differences Gender differences Acculturation Religiosity Sexuality Asian Hispanic Euro-American 

References

  1. Ahrold, T. K., Woo, J. S., Brotto, L. M., & Meston, C. M. (2007, August). Acculturation effects on sexual function: Does minority group visibility matter? Poster presented at the meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1950). The individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation. New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar
  3. Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amaro, H., Navarro, A., Conron, K., Raj, A., & On, C. (2002). Cultural influences on women’s sexual health. In R. J. DiClemente & G. M. Wingood (Eds.), Women’s sexual and reproductive health (pp. 71–92). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bassett, R. L. (1999). Intrinsic religious motivation scale. In P. C. Hill & R. W. Hood (Eds.), Measures of religiosity (pp. 135–137). Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bassett, R. L., Smith, H. L., Newell, R. L., & Richards, A. H. (1999). Thou shalt not like sex: Taking another look at religiousness and sexual attitudes. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 18, 205–216.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, K., & Bergman, C. (1993). Investigating Hispanic adolescent involvement with alcohol: A focus group interview approach. Health Education Research, 8, 151–158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Beckwith, H. D., & Morrow, J. A. (2005). Sexual attitudes of college students: The impact of religiosity and spirituality. College Student Journal, 39, 357–367.Google Scholar
  10. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46, 5–34.Google Scholar
  11. Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 55, 303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonilla, L., & Porter, J. (1990). A comparison of Latino, Black, and non-Hispanic white attitudes toward homosexuality. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 12, 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brotto, L. A., Chik, H. M., Ryder, A. G., Gorzalka, B. B., & Seal, B. N. (2005). Acculturation and sexual function in Asian women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 613–626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brotto, L. A., Woo, J. S., & Ryder, A. G. (2007). Acculturation and sexual function in Canadian East Asian men. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 4, 72–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bulbeck, C. (2005). “The mighty pillar of the family”: Young people’s vocabularies on household gender arrangements in the Asia-Pacific region. Gender, Work, and Organization, 12, 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choi, K., Catania, J., & Dolcini, M. (1994). Extramarital sex and HIV risk behavior among US adults: Results from the national AIDS behavioral survey. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 2003–2007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cochran, J. K., & Beeghley, L. (1991). The influence of religion on attitudes toward nonmarital sexuality: A preliminary assessment of reference group theory. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coreno, T. (2002). Fundamentalism as a class culture. Sociology of Religion, 63, 335–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Costigan, C. L., & Su, T. F. (2004). Orthogonal versus linear models of acculturation among immigrant Chinese Canadians: A comparison of mothers, fathers, and children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 518–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Demerath, N. J. (2003). Crossing the Gods: World religions and worldly politics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Derogatis, L. R. (1978). Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometrics Research.Google Scholar
  22. Eisenman, R., & Dantzker, M. L. (2006). Gender and ethnic differences in sexual attitudes at a Hispanic-serving university. Journal of General Psychology, 133, 153–162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Farmer, M., Trapnell, P. D., & Meston, C. M. (2008). The relation between sexual behavior and religiosity subtypes: A test of the secularization hypothesis. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9407-0.
  24. Francis, L. J., & Wilcox, C. (1998). Religiosity and femininity: Do women really hold a more positive attitude toward Christianity? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 462–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gorsuch, R. L., & Venable, G. D. (1983). Development of an “age universal” IE scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jemmott, L. S., Jemmott, J. B., & Villarruel, A. M. (2002). Predicting intentions and condom use among Latino college students. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 13, 59–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. LaFromboise, T., Coleman, H. L., & Gerton, J. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 395–412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999). Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 537–544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Leiblum, S., Wiegel, M., & Brickle, F. (2003). Sexual attitudes of US and Canadian medical students: The role of ethnicity, gender, religion and acculturation. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18, 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levinson, R. A., Jaccard, J., & Beamer, L. (1995). Older adolescents’ engagement in casual sex: Impact of risk perception and psychosocial motivation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marin, B. V. O., Gomez, C. A., & Hearst, N. (1993). Multiple heterosexual partners and condom use among Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites. Family Planning Perspectives, 25, 170–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marin, B., & Marin, G. (1992). Predictors of condom accessibility among Hispanics in San Francisco. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 592–595.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Marín, B., Tschann, J., Gómez, C., & Kegeles, S. (1993). Acculturation and gender differences in sexual attitudes and behaviors: Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic White unmarried adults. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 1759–1761.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Marler, P. L., & Hadaway, C. K. (1993). Toward a typology of protestant “marginal members”. Review of Religious Research, 35, 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Massey, D. S. (1993). Latinos, poverty, and the underclass: A new agenda for research. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 15, 449–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCree, D. H., Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R., Davies, S., & Harrington, K. F. (2003). Religiosity and risky sexual behavior in African-American adolescent females. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 2–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McKelvey, R., Webb, J., Baldassar, L., Robinson, S., & Riley, G. (1999). Sex knowledge and sexual attitudes among medical and nursing students. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 33, 260–266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Meston, C. M., Heiman, J. R., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1998a). Socially desirable responding and sexuality self-reports. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meston, C. M., Trapnell, P. D., & Gorzalka, B. B. (1996). Ethnic and gender differences in sexuality: Variations in sexual behavior between Asian and non-Asian university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 33–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Meston, C. M., Trapnell, P. D., & Gorzalka, B. B. (1998b). Ethnic, gender, and length-of-residency influences on sexual knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 176–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, A. S., & Hoffmann, J. P. (1995). Risk and religion: An explanation of gender differences in religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, W. R., & Thoresen, C. E. (2003). Spirituality, religion, and health. American Psychologist, 58, 24–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitchell, C. (2006). The religious content of ethnic identities. Sociology, 40, 1135–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Musgrave, C. F., Allen, C. E., & Allen, G. J. (2002). Spirituality and health for women of color. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 557–560.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Oropesa, R. S. (1996). Normative beliefs about marriage and cohabitation: A comparison of non-Latino Whites, Mexican Americans, and Puerto Ricans. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Penn, C. D., Hernandez, S. L., & Bermúdez, J. M. (1997). Using a cross-cultural perspective to understand infidelity in couples therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raffaelli, M., & Green, S. (2003). Parent-adolescent communication about sex: Retrospective reports by Latino college students. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 474–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ramirez, M. I. (1984). Assessing and understanding biculturalism-multiculturalism in Mexican-American adults. In J. L. Martinez (Ed.), Chicano psychology (2nd ed., pp. 77–94). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Roosens, E. (1989). Creating ethnicity: The process of ethnogenesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Rostosky, S. S., Wilcox, B. L., Wright, M. L. C., & Randall, B. A. (2004). The impact of religiosity on adolescent sexual behavior: A review of the evidence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 677–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ryder, A. G., Alden, L. E., & Paulhus, D. L. (2000). Is acculturation unidimensional or bidimensional? A head-to-head comparison in the prediction of personality, self-identity, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 49–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Salant, T., & Lauderdale, D. S. (2003). Measuring culture: A critical review of acculturation and health in Asian immigrant populations. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 71–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sanchez, D. T., Crocker, J., & Boike, K. R. (2005). Doing gender in the bedroom: Inverting in gender norms and the sexual experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1445–1455.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tang, C. S., Lai, F. D., & Chung, T. K. H. (1997). Assessment of sexual functioning for Chinese college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 79–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Thornton, A., & Camburn, D. (1989). Religious participation and adolescent sexual behavior and attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 641–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. United States Census Bureau Population Division. (2007). Retrieved January 15, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/006808.html.
  57. Welwood, J. (2000). Toward a psychology of awakening: Buddhism, psychotherapy, and the path of personal and spiritual transformation. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  58. Whitley, B. E. (1988). The relation of gender-role orientation to sexual experience among college students. Sex Roles, 19, 619–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Whitley, B. E. (2001). Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles, 45, 691–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wong-Rieger, D., & Quintana, D. (1987). Comparative acculturation of Southeast Asian and Hispanic immigrants and sojourners. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang, F. (1999). Chinese Christians in America: Conversion, assimilation, and adhesive identities. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
  62. Yang, F., & Ebaugh, H. R. (2001). Religion and ethnicity among new immigrants: The impact of majority/minority status in home and host countries. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations