Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 619–636 | Cite as

Sex Differences in Personality Traits and Gender-Related Occupational Preferences across 53 Nations: Testing Evolutionary and Social-Environmental Theories

Original Paper

Abstract

Using data from over 200,000 participants from 53 nations, I examined the cross-cultural consistency of sex differences for four traits: extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism, and male-versus-female-typical occupational preferences. Across nations, men and women differed significantly on all four traits (mean ds = −.15, −.56, −.41, and 1.40, respectively, with negative values indicating women scoring higher). The strongest evidence for sex differences in SDs was for extraversion (women more variable) and for agreeableness (men more variable). United Nations indices of gender equality and economic development were associated with larger sex differences in agreeableness, but not with sex differences in other traits. Gender equality and economic development were negatively associated with mean national levels of neuroticism, suggesting that economic stress was associated with higher neuroticism. Regression analyses explored the power of sex, gender equality, and their interaction to predict men’s and women’s 106 national trait means for each of the four traits. Only sex predicted means for all four traits, and sex predicted trait means much more strongly than did gender equality or the interaction between sex and gender equality. These results suggest that biological factors may contribute to sex differences in personality and that culture plays a negligible to small role in moderating sex differences in personality.

Keywords

BBC Internet study Big Five traits Culture Gender-related interests Gender roles Personality Sex differences 

References

  1. Archer, J., & Mehdikhani, M. (2003). Variability among males in sexually selected attributes. Review of General Psychology, 7, 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6, 166–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analysis of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Buss, D. M. (2005). Sex differences in the design features of socially contingent mating adaptations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 278–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality across cultures: Robust and surprising results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2005). Universal sex differences across patriarchal cultures ≠ evolved psychological dispositions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 281–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Guimond, S., Branscombe, N. R., Brunot, S., Buunk, A. P., Chatard, A., Desert, M., et al. (2007). Culture, gender, and the self: Variations and impact of social comparison processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1118–1134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hines, M. (2004). Brain gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children’s sex role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 82–173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Langlois, J. H., & Downs, D. (1980). Mothers, fathers and peers as socialization agents of sex-typed play behavior in young children. Child Development, 51, 1217–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual difference and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the “People-Things” dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996–1009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lippa, R. A. (2001). On deconstructing and reconstructing masculinity-femininity. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 168–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, nature, and nurture (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Lippa, R. A. (2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: An examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 198–208.Google Scholar
  25. Lippa, R. A. (2008). Sex differences and sexual orientation differences in personality: Findings from the BBC Internet survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 173–187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lippa, R. A. (in press). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior.Google Scholar
  27. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive theories of early gender development. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 903–933.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. McCauley, C., Ottati, V., & Lee, Y. (1999). National differences in economic growth: The role of personality and culture. In Y. Lee, C. R. McCauley, & J. G. Draguns (Eds.), Personality and person perception across cultures (pp. 85–100). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. McCrae, R. R. (2002). NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures: Further intercultural comparisons. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor models of personality across cultures (pp. 105–128). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 79 members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005a). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547–561.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 79 members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005b). Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 407–425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Moffit, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peabody, D. (1999). National characteristics: Dimensions for comparison. In Y. Lee, C. R. McCauley, & J. G. Draguns (Eds.), Personality and person perception across cultures (pp. 65–84). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Prediger, D. J. (1982). Dimensions underlying Holland’s hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 259–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reimers, S. (2007). The BBC sex differences study: General methodology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 147–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ruble, D. N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). Gender development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. 3): Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 993–1016). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168–182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Snyder, M. (1981). On the self-perpetuating nature of social stereotypes. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 183–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  42. Swann, W. B. (1999). Resilient identities: Self-relationships and the construction of social reality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  43. Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  44. Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. (1993). Evaluating Holland’s and Gati’s vocational interest models: A structural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multi-nation study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of men and women: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCalifornia State University, FullertonFullertonUSA

Personalised recommendations