Abstract
Waitresses completed an on-line survey about their physical characteristics, self-perceived attractiveness and sexiness, and average tips. The waitresses’ self-rated physical attractiveness increased with their breast sizes and decreased with their ages, waist-to-hip ratios, and body sizes. Similar effects were observed on self-rated sexiness, with the exception of age, which varied with self-rated sexiness in a negative, quadratic relationship rather than a linear one. Moreover, the waitresses’ tips varied with age in a negative, quadratic relationship, increased with breast size, increased with having blond hair, and decreased with body size. These findings, which are discussed from an evolutionary perspective, make several contributions to the literature on female physical attractiveness. First, they replicate some previous findings regarding the determinants of female physical attractiveness using a larger, more diverse, and more ecologically valid set of stimuli than has been studied before. Second, they provide needed evidence that some of those determinants of female beauty affect interpersonal behaviors as well as attractiveness ratings. Finally, they indicate that some determinants of female physical attractiveness do not have the same effects on overt interpersonal behavior (such as tipping) that they have on attractiveness ratings. This latter contribution highlights the need for more ecologically valid tests of evolutionary theories about the determinants and consequences of female beauty.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
Campos, L., Otta, E., & Siqueira, J. O. (2002). Sex differences in mate selection strategies: Content analyses and responses to personal advertisements in Brazil. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 395–406.
Conlin, M., Lynn, M., & O’Donahue, T. (2003). The norm of restaurant tipping. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 52, 97–321.
Cunningham, M. R., Druen, P. B., & Barbee, A. P. (1997). Angels, mentors, and friends: Trade-offs among evolutionary, social, and individual variables in physical appearance. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 109–140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Feinman, S., & Gill, G. W. (1978). Sex differences in physical attractiveness preferences. Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 43–52.
Frost, P. (2006). European hair and eye color: A case of frequency-dependent sexual selection? Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 85–103.
Gallup, G. G. (1982). Permanent breast enlargement in human females: A sociobiological analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 11, 597–601.
Geary, D. C., Vigil, J., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2004). Evolution of human mate choice. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 27–42.
Gueguen, N. (2007). Women’s bust size and men’s courtship solicitation. Body Image, 4, 386–390.
Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 501–513.
Jackson, L. A. (1992). Physical appearance and gender: Sociobiological and sociocultural perspectives. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Jones, D. (1996). Physical attractiveness and the theory of sexual selection. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.
Juni, S., & Roth, M. M. (1985). The influence of hair color on eliciting help: Do blondes have more fun? Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 11–14.
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–91.
Kurzban, R., & Weeden, J. (2005). HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 227–244.
Lynn, M. (2007). [Online restaurant server survey]. Unpublished raw data.
Lynn, M., & McCall, M. (2000). Beyond gratitude and gratuity: A meta-analytic review of the predictors of restaurant tipping. Working paper, School of Hotel Administration, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Lynn, M., & Shurgot, B. A. (1984). Responses to lonely hearts advertisements: Effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique and coloration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 349–357.
Lynn, M., & Simons, T. (2000). Predictors of male and female servers’ average tip earnings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 241–252.
Marlowe, F., Apicella, C., & Reed, D. (2005). Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 458–468.
McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.
Miller, C. (2006). Perceived differences between blonde and brunette females: Intelligence, promiscuity and attractiveness. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Northern Colorado, Greely, CO.
Pawlowski, B., & Koziel, S. (2002). The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 139–149.
Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntley, J., Tooke, W., Buss, D. M., Fisher, M. L., et al. (2002). Is there an early-30’s peak in female sexual desire? Cross-sectional evidence from the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11, 1–18.
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.
Singh, D. (2004). Mating strategies of young women: Role of physical attractiveness. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 43–54.
Smith, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., & Tovee, M. J. (2007). Color 3D bodies and judgments of human female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 48–54.
Swami, V., Capario, C., Tovee, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Japan: A cross-cultural study. European Journal of Personality, 20, 69–81.
Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tantleff-Dunn, S. (2001). Breast and chest size: Ideals and stereotypes through the 1990s. Sex Roles, 45, 231–242.
Tantleff-Dunn, S. (2002). Biggest isn’t always best: The effect of breast size on perceptions of women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2253–2265.
Tovee, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Emery, J. L., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 211–218.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). All across the U.S.A.: Population distribution and composition, 2000. Population profile of the United States: 2000. Retrieved July 30, 2007, from http://www.census.gov
Voracek, M., & Fisher, M. L. (2006). Success is all in the measures: Androgenousness, curvaceousness, and starring frequencies in adult media actresses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 297–304.
Weeden, J., & Sabini, J. (2005). Physical attractiveness and health in western societies: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 635–653.
Wilson, J. M. B., Tripp, D. A., & Boland, F. J. (2005). The relative contributions of waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index to judgments of attractiveness. Sexualities, Evolution and Gender, 7, 245–267.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Vivienne Wildes and the waiter at waiterrant.net for help in recruiting subjects.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lynn, M. Determinants and Consequences of Female Attractiveness and Sexiness: Realistic Tests with Restaurant Waitresses. Arch Sex Behav 38, 737–745 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9379-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9379-0